Leaderboard

Isla Rose was born at 2:20am!

Also love these-

If Mueller completes this investigation leaving no doubt of criminal activity from this administration while at the same time paying for %80 of it with seized cash from Russian money laundering schemes, he should be anointed as King to a newly formed department called the Pimpingest Pimps Who Have Ever Pimped So Fucking Hard.

It was locker room collusion.

I've done it boys, for the first time ever, given money to a politician #teambeto

My dad is a 74-year-old Texas Ex and he texted me this today: "Texas are four-point favorites WTF." That is his first use of WTF, ever.

I thought the hyperlink to nikki-haley-curtains.html was going to be much more interesting.

Or, it’s completely irrelevant because he’s the victim.

I am really starting to believe the op/ed was a plant. The author didn't say anything negative about Trump that wasn't already out there. What was new/shocking was the revelation of a collective within the government working to actively subvert the President. A deep-state by any other name. This revelation was laced with trigger words and phrases for the Trump base like 'resistance' and 'deep state' and fits the narrative of Trump being victimized by those that don't want to see him MAGA. And Trump has only very tepidly attempted to discredit the op/ed's validity or control perception in its wake. Contrast that to how he has rallied people to attack the assertions of Woodward's book. His MO is to attack, deny and discredit vehemently until he has no other option. But not so much here. The more I consider the op/ed, the more a question keeps popping up in my head: If the President is such a danger to America that you as a senior staff member would work behind the scenes to thwart his intentions, why on earth would you publicize that? Putting the governmental 'resistance' into the spotlight only alerts and embarrasses the President to act. It makes you or others working similarly more likely to be discovered and replaced by someone supportive of the President. It makes your efforts to protect America much less likely to succeed. So why do it? I can't think of any good, logical answer for that. I believe it more likely that the op/ed was carefully crafted for some other purpose and planted with the NYT by someone who could plausibly have authored it. The question then becomes what could the op/ed's other purpose of be? Lets return to the big reveal of the piece. Who could benefit from the belief that there is a real, no-shit shadow-state in the government that is working against the President, sabotaging his efforts to lead and effectively undermining his election? Donald J Trump If that shadow-state is real, or enough people believe it to be so, then he would be justified in dismantling it. Expect to see that notion reinforced and acted upon at some point. Expect it be used as the basis for Trump to carry out a political purge. Expect it to be used to target people like Sessions, Rosenstein and anyone else who doesn't completely kowtow to Trump's authority. Expect it to be used in an attempt to end Mueller's investigation. That scenario is at least logical. Diabolical, but logical.

Only if you want to win and lose every game.

For sure ... we talk about that exact phenomenon at aggypedia: "aggy, Party of One, Your Table is Ready"

New Guard Day for the 84.... by

In Soviet Russia, semen jacks you.

Javanka took his phone so he wouldn’t draw his fans’ attention to the Manafort flip. He desperately wants to rip into Manafort. Or they are worried he’ll make another Puerto Rican comment.

Lulz

How about you get the fuck over yourself you sniveling attention whore.

^^ Yeah, but an hour after it passes you'll be ready for another.

Because we care so much about Latinos that we have fix their language for them as its adjectives are generally either masculine or feminine without a gender neutral option.

If you don't love this man and if you say a negative word about him, you should be caged and deported.

Recruiting is a grind. You don’t give up until signing day. Leal has visited us since committing, he definitely is open to some degree and that will amplify when the aggy coaster drops. And give up on Demas? WTF? Demond even admitted the week after that he wasn’t fully committed. Heck this weekend alone he is visiting TCU. Kid had 5 TDs on 5 receptions last night. Go watch the highlights. This is a kid you fight for. Evans? He is uncommitted AND visiting us this weekend. Why the fuck would we give up on Zach, a once in a decade player? Hornsby? Visited us recently and hasn’t gone public with his supposed commitment to aggy. we beat USC, aggy gets raped by Bama and shit will start to normalize in recruiting. I can’t predict whether the vaginas will stop bleeding around here though.

That is essentially what it boils down to. Social media policies keep from commenting on ongoing investigations and what not. I’ll answer general questions and stuff, but this world that we live in where information is demanded and spread so quickly and with no regard to accuracy is a thorn in my side. I hate social media.

Anybody who shits on FC gets a like from me. Fuck that disingenuous, whataboutist, intellectual slug.

Yeah, you never like to see something like this undermine the integrity of a storied football program like tOSU.

Whether that crowd says it or not, fact remains they aren't very good. Beating a not very good team is better than the alternative, but the following weeks will tell us how far we have to go, not usc.

I guess Gillum came to....monkey this race up. *rputs on sunglasses while theme from csi Miami plays in the background*

The Lulz forum is no longer blocked at work for some reason, so here's a Jimmy update. This idea I had is finally starting to have fruit. Jimmy - Hey Bryan is your fishing license expired? Bryan - no, why? Jimmy - Ya know, Jimmy is also a girls name you just gotta put an I E at the end Tina got an upratory infection. "I took a gander through my bi-nock-lurrs" Sure is quite in here "I got a chuckle yesterday, I guess I was watching some football......" Richard Sherman = Sherman Williams I like the quarterback for Green Bay cause he has a good smile Jimmy (to Raul) - what's your name? Raul - what?! Jimmy - is it Tim? (Raul has sat two cubes over for 1 1/2 years) "Tina bought the biggest ass brisket" "I told Tina, if we don't have relations soon you can call me jimmy-aint-come-lately"

Trump isn't working clandestinely. He's out in the open.

Gentlemen: An important point .....the shooting was Sept. 6 at 10pm. THE SEARCH WARRANT was signed on Sept. 7 and the search was conducted. Prolly as fast as they could find a judge to sign it at that hour, which in a metro area would be pretty quick. The RETURN was recently filed, and the items found became a public record. The search of his residence took place shortly after the shooting, not in the last few days. I agree that her place should have been searched at a minimum to show the layout of the place to confirm or negate the reasonableness of her beliefs then existing. NOTE: if she did give consent, there would be no need for a warrant and hence no public record of it, so to assume, from the lack of a public record, that a search did not take place is an assumption that this lawyer, who is deathly allergic to speculation and assumptions, will not make at the present time.

He's getting his ostrich jacket back as part of the deal.

Fuck OU.

Fuck you and fuck Huck and your act bullshit. I have explained that just because you commit a crime outside your home, you don't automatically become subject to an invasive search in your home. Authorities have to articulate something in the form of evidence that is in your home that they would expect to find. They don't just get to go fishing because you shot someone somewhere else. Is it possible, based on facts that we don't know, that the investigators have sought and obtained a warrant to search her home? Sure. But being a crime perpetrator doesn't automatically waive your fourth amendment rights. My problem with a lot of the posters on this thread is that you are knee-jerking and not giving anything any thought other than how things ought to align with your predetermined outcome. This is Exhibit A. It's not even devils advocacy, it's presenting things that people may not have thought of in their headlong rush to judgment.

EMAW is definitely getting paid by the word this morning.

Watershed, you dumb son of a bitch.

I've enjoyed reading those trying to twist to find some moral equivalency between the GOP and Dems. The GOP who hides behind a shield of Christianity while trying to regulate their ethical and moral standards yet are the worst abusers of it all. Yelling that "Dems lie too!" yet too blind or obtuse to see the systematic nature of the GOP. Sure Dems lie too, but at an individual level. Where is the concerted effort to regulate hypocrisy like the GOP? Where are the leaders who hold the President to a standard that they previously enforced?

That's pretty dumb.

intercoastal flood surge was one of my favorite stone temple pilot songs

Oh hai

That very well could be an adult question. That’s the current perception of your profession by many. Congrats.

Well that's sort of what we've been doing