Jump to content

Texas Wahoo

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1667
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Texas Wahoo

  1. I sincerely hope this isn't true. If so the PK needs to go bye bye and Sark offer Gare the job He wasn't even working for UT last year, right? Did he call up PK in between music sets to suggest changing up the defense for the playoff?
  2. Does every thread on this god-forsaken website end up devolving into rehashing previous failures? That being said, it was 2004 for me.
  3. ESPN+, so you'll have to pay an extra $11 per month.
  4. The weird comma isn't why it "required clarification." With or without the comma, there is no way to read the rule as saying that if one team in a multiple team tie has defeated the other teams - they win the tie-breaker. In that scenario, not every team has played each other, so the rule says go to step 2. The new rule may not have been unfair, but it certainly changed the way the tiebreaker works.
  5. Scheer doesn’t know what it means either. Lol
  6. I don’t know if he’s any good, but there’s another TE on the market.
  7. Is it supposed to look like he's wearing a sandwich board?
  8. It probably has something to do with hiring someone from Washington that probably did not recruit any of these guys and thus they do not know him at all. Add in the fact that it seems like his coordinators/position coaches are either from Washington or coaches from smaller schools that would not have been recruiting the same level of athlete and thus the current players would not know them either. My guess is it would have been a little better if they had hired Sark/Lanning/Norvell.
  9. I think the bloom is off the rose.
  10. I do not see the NCAA agreeing to make two 1-2 win teams eligible for post-season play when they have been such sticklers for the rules about 5-7 teams.
×
×
  • Create New...