Jump to content

Herpa Derpa

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    3,820
  • Joined

Everything posted by Herpa Derpa

  1. Obvious bias is obvious, but I find I pull out TTF regularly during the season which I can't say for any other pre-season rag.
  2. Because the sun will always rise and aggy will always need a new culture. Bet your bottom dollar.
  3. False. You've been told repeatedly there is a 0.000000% chance Texas would host a regional. Don't try and now claim a backdoor SR scenario you never suggested in a foolish attempt to project superiority. Just take the loss, pussy.
  4. At least this makes me think he can't land a HC job at any level. His only brush with success is the 1985 Super Bowl ring he got while spending the entire year on the Bears IR. Not the last time he would bask in the achievements of others.
  5. New Jersey and you do it by driving over the river. Philly is on the border. But still stupid. Nice luck to have the final leg in your hometown. Fair season given the pandemic restrictions at the time of filming.
  6. NIL funded only by microtransactions. Will separate the poors from the nurses.
  7. Sometimes a new start is best for everyone.
  8. Maybe a dumb question, but why is it 25 and not 24? Not one of the three cover players will be in the NCAA in 2025.
  9. ...and here's where you lose me.
  10. Go Bison! Please, please, please, let me get what I want.
  11. Sherlock Holmes, Godzilla, James Bond, Planet of the Apes, Star Wars, Star Trek, Rocky/Creed, Batman, Halloween, Friday the 13th, Indiana Jones, Mission Impossible, and even Fast & Furious are all amused by just 20 years of output.
  12. Coppola hasn't made a good film since 1988 and is now in his 80s making a story he's been kicking around since 1977. Not holding out any hope for greatness here.
  13. I do enjoy watching these umps work the replay to confirm they are stone cold morons.
  14. RT audience score can be useful for certain movies that have a high self-selection audience. An example is the latest Guy Ritchie flick. People who go to see a Guy Ritchie film are generally fans who want to see a Guy Ritchie movie and all that entails. A high audience score tells you it hit the mark regardless of how the critics view the film. I've always been a disciple of the Ebert school of review. it . I will watch anything from The Room to The Godfather and can enjoy it all with the right frame of mind. The critic and audience score combo will generally tell you what to expect as laid out by @Chuckie Finster, but I'd have different definitions. High critic + High audience = well made, enjoyable on multiple levels. You might not like film if you don't like this. High critic + Low audience = niche subject or plot, outside the realm of the vox populi. Possibly outstanding. Possibly horrendous. Low critic + High audience = self-selecting audience who got what they were looking for and maker who couldn't care less about prestige. If you're one of the self-selecting, you'll love it. If not, you just don't get it, man. Low critic + Low audience = Razzie nominee, possibly worth watching on an edible night.
  15. At the end of the day, it's night.
  16. To be fair, 15 years younger is probably the only difference he sought.
  17. Yep. Should be a good finale. Only pair left that is really weak is the Toxic Twins. Which means one of the other three teams will get eliminated next week because that's just how it goes. My money is on Rod and Tish to slip up.
×
×
  • Create New...