babysdaddy

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1408181206722691077?s=20

Has anyone suggested to Gov Abbott that he could pay for the wall by legalizing weed? Hampers his competitors from the south, pays for the wall, and has happy citizens all at once? No?

well this is fucking stupid

this thing blew my mind. I watched it and then immediately started it again. I'll probably watch one more time tonight.

I'm actually pretty shocked the greek system is still around and operating at UT. I read somewhere that bulk of the athletic donations to UT come from ex greeks so maybe not a total shock. But as it relates to the question, the bigger houses at UT have feeder highschools. Some guys can get in that come from non established pipeline high schools but almost always the pledge classes will be dominated by those same schools. Those schools that feed are not the most diverse places (or at least don't have many black students attending UT) and the membership reflects that. It's really as simple as that. And the one I was in had every group imaginable....except black dudes.

yes, I've got family in Hockley county and they get their news from facebook and they literally said out loud that "fauci and gates released the virus to make money off the vaccine". Just breathtakingly stupid. And these are good people. Had one uncle tell me that given his age and health his doc told him he was not at risk. Disregard the fact that he's 5'10" and 230, I explained that it wasn't him I was worried about but our other, older, fatter relatives.

I tried to find that poll and could not. Can you share a link?

Can I make that same 'mistake' and make $50 mil? Because sign me up

Those were already leaked and published by the NY Times last year at some point.

what kind of an asshole is still catching covid at this point?

What a hack article. This whole stunt of leaking these and publishing them was with political purpose in mind so no idea why it's in DT.

Was a mock. Then you dropped a masters line so I’m the asshole, apparently. Guests allowed starting next month for us

There was a lot of things that went on in the public sphere about this but what eventually convinced me there was nothing really there was testimony by Clapper/Lynch/Yates saying that no, they never saw any evidence of collusion. I'm sure someone will attack Taibbi but that does not take away that people that would know what went on said the below things under oath. https://taibbi.substack.com/p/aaugh-a-brief-list-of-official-russia “More than Circumstantial Evidence” for collision, Meet The Press, March 22, 2017. The ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, was asked by Chuck Todd on Meet the Press if he only had a circumstantial case for collusion against Donald Trump. “Actually no, Chuck,” he said. “I can tell you that the case is more than that and I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.” Schiff never had such evidence, and never explained what he meant. Moreover, in secret testimony, he would repeatedly seek confirmation of his public statements, and would repeatedly be shot down. In July of 2017, he asked former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper if such evidence existed. Clapper said he “never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.” Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch later said, “I don't recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates said of her knowledge of the state of the case at the time she left office in early 2017, “We were at the fact-gathering stage, not the concluding stage.” The continued use of Adam Schiff as a reliable source, when he repeatedly proved unreliable, was one of the major problems with Russia coverage during this period.

I may be misremembering but I think the Senate intelligence report did include the fact that Manafort shared polling data with some Russian. The facts and circumstances that get left out are when he did it (sometime in May or June 2016) and some inferred reasons for why (either he was in debt or trying to get paid). Regardless, it was traitorous and he should be hung (hanged?) but polling data 6 months prior to the election probably didn't turn the tide.

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't you get someone banned, at least temporarily, for calling you 'captainantifa'?

Here is a hypothetical for you, say Trump did back up Fauci the entire time (I think I remember them working well together at first) and encouraged mask wearing and was deferential to the scientific team the entire time and ended up reelected. Would you have preferred that alternate timeline to the one we have?

It's wagyu shit, actually. But not on that

I lost count 😆

Sometimes I read things on this board that are so delusional I wonder if it is made in jest. Liberals don't politicize everything? Jesus wildcat. Go back to last February and imagine Trump, coming off his 2nd impeachment in which every liberal in this country wanted him executed, dictating a hard lockdown, mask wearing, and social isolation. The behavior and amount of guttural screaming from liberals about him being a racist dictator and a nazi would've made the antimask maga faction look like the care bears.

The political environment in the country restricted individual's ability to look objectively at the situation. And people that loathe Trump choose to believe the story the Chinese government was spinning over the US government because of that hatred. Only now that President Biden is in office the most plausible story of the source of the outbreak is being able to be discussed rationally. The immediate reaction from our most respected newspapers and media organizations was to dismiss the lap leak theory out of hand because Republicans dared to point to the possibility.

I had not heard of this story until today. This is absolutely horrifying. I have those cameras for my kid's rooms and just can't imagine watching my 4 year old get taken out of her bed. What the fuck