Drew

That’s a long fucking time off. Even if the health improves you chance being rusty as shit against a good team that just won a playoff game.

They will definitely adjust this to prevent rematches early. Yeah that’s gonna change. They won’t want rematches or same conferences playing till the semis at least. Not unless it’s in the title game. Agreed. Feel only Oregon or Texas losing gets 5 over ND. Anyone else losing will be 6 or lower.

Some?

He should be the one to want to leave...so many great seasons but can't beat the bully, even when they're down...sucks to be him, but OSU does expect Titles and to beat Michigan. I get it. They shouldn't be in a rush to get rid of him though.

Kellso In reply to Aggie • 8:45a, 12/2/24 Aggie said: We literally play the schedule card every opportunity lol Who knows if they do .. but I don't think we make the playoff with their schedule either You have to really wonder if playing a harder schedule is worth it if in the last 30 years there are no trips to Atlanta, and only one trip to the BIGXII title game. Florida St and Miami became powerhouse programs in the 1990's when they were the only big dog football programs in the ACC and BIG East. Would you rather be the big fish in a small pond, or a big fish in a huge pond with other big fishes? Texas fled the BIGXII because they were tired of TCU and Baylor kicking their ass....so it works both ways. Texas..."FLED" the Big 12 to escape TCU and Baylor? Did we not win the conference last year?

OMG the deliciousness of Conner going to LSU to beat them in their own Tahj Mahal next year would be amazing. Stupi Sip...they kept the better Coach and none of the players left with Schloss...that's just proof he's not really THE guy.

This is where I'm at. Like of Oregon loses, they're going in the 5th...but if Penn St or Texas lose, they probably going to 6/7 instead of 5 based on the tea leaves...and they still might decide Ohio St is higher than one or both of them.

This is exactly what I was thinking. They only had one scoring drive of more than 35 yards. the 89 yard drive was the back breaker. They get a stop there and Texas has the ball close to midfield with momentum down 8. Models don’t account for shell shocked QBs turning the ball over 3+ times on our own side of the field.

This game is on drugs.

Georgia's offense wasn't even that good that game iirc. They had one, back breaking stupid long drive, after Texas got it to 23-15 and that was the end of it. Other than that it was a bunch of FG's and short fields. Quinn or a RB will probably turn the ball over once, just survive it and move on.

And they STILL should have used rankings to eliminate the lowest ranked team. It was silly.

I guess this whole thing confuses me cause HOW the fuck? Because Florida beat Ole Miss, who beat Texas? Was that it?

Like Texas has no wins either...just Miss ST too. And Michigan. And Colorado ST. And UTSA, and La Monroe in non Conference(all but one is Bowl Bound) plus a bunch of team in the greatest confernce ever that beat teams in the top 10(Kentucky, OU, Vandy, and Arkansas)

Watch Conner go to some team, like Florida ST or wherever, and have them rebound for 8+ wins and Aggy still be looking for a QB... I'm sure they'll handle it well.

Washington St aint the daggum SEC conference!

Does no one see ND getting 5? They're already ranked there..and i can see them moving Pedo behind them, and even Texas for reasons. I think the ONLY lock for 5 over ND is Oregon with a loss...i would suspect Texas would be too since we've basically been Top 5 all year.

Stupid T sips...They'll have 4 losses. Of course they're not a good team.

Oh c'mon some of that aint true and you know...Florida winning the Big 12? With as awful as they were to start the year? Yes they finished strong, but they wouldn't have. SC might have, just depending on matchups, and are literally one of the hottest teams in football right now. BTW I clearly said i wouldn't pick any Big 12 team to compete with the top of SEC/Big 10 just that as conferences, they're competitive is all.

The still would be. Give the top 5 conference auto bids still. Just not lock them in to the Top 4 spots. There is NO reason the 8th ranked SMU(or lower Clemson) should get the 3 seed or 10th-12th ranked Boise/Big 12 champ gets the 4 seed over the other teams. Give the Conference champs playoff births, but then seed based on the rankings. You could even get away from the committee and use the god damn AP to slot them. they wouldn't I suspect that IF Bama were to get in, they'd be ranked 11 or 12 this week AHEAD of any Big 12 team, meaning they'll slide up when Miami slides out most likely. If Bama makes the playoffs they'll be at worst the 11 seed. Why would you think that? I think the Big 12 winner is 12, unless UNLV beats Boise, then they're 12 and the Big 12 champ is 4(LOL) Ah, you're confusing the top of the conference with the strength of the conference. The same shit we used to say about the SEC. Bama ran it for a Decade plus, and every once in a while LSU or Georgia would prop it up too...but under those top 4/5 teams they weren't any better than the Big 12. The Big 12 is a deep and competitive conference. NO their Top 4 teams wouldn't win all their games against the 4 best SEC/Big 10 teams. But 5-12 would hang easily with the 5-12 for the other conferences. And they don't have Miss St or Purdue in the Big 12.

At least they included Texas this week.

From Gurney Halleck himself

Why is he crying about the 12th man penalty. yes you are given a chance to sub. But Texas had subbed and was lined up ready to snap. They can’t hold it forever.