Bullneck

"If an LSU couple gets divorced are they still cousins?"

Pretty good explainer for MAGA . . . from 2022. Spoilered for length (and uneditedness)

Forced Trump Birth!

Loomer is a slumpbuster. Period. Damn on those Portuguese Bend photos. Back in the day that stretch of road was always new asphalt but it looks like development pressure (money, in other words) got some condos built, and subsequently swallowed up by landslides. Wow, just wow.

My guess is any single family home in RPV is at least $2 million. @SBbruin how accurate is that? No, those of you in Little Rock, nothing to worry about.

Seriously. I'm sure when Ma & Pa from Tyler finally get their big trip to NYC the first thing they say once they get into their Times Square hotel room is "Where da white people at?"

theatlantic Tuesday’s presidential debate was, among other things, an excellent real-world test of the candidates’ cognitive fitness—and any fair-minded mental-health expert would be very worried about Donald Trump’s performance, Richard A. Friedman writes.⁠ ⁠ Friedman, a psychiatrist, has not examined either of the candidates, but he did watch the debate “with particular attention to the candidates’ vocabulary, verbal and logical coherence, and ability to adapt to new topics—all signs of a healthy brain.” Although Kamala Harris “certainly exhibited some rigidity and repetition, her speech remained within the normal realm for politicians, who have a reputation for harping on their favorite talking points,” he writes. “By contrast, Donald Trump’s expressions of those tendencies were alarming. He displayed some striking, if familiar, patterns that are commonly seen among people in cognitive decline.”⁠ ⁠ For much of the debate, Friedman notes, Trump’s train of thought was difficult, if not impossible, to follow. His answers went beyond evasiveness, into circumstantial and tangential speech. His repetitions “seemed compulsive, not strategic,” and he was repetitive in not just his form but also his content. After praising the Hungarian strongman Viktor Orbán, for instance, “Trump spoke unprompted, at length, and without clarity about gas pipelines in the United States and Europe, an issue unlikely to connect with many voters. A few minutes later, he brought up the pipelines again.” ⁠ ⁠ “If a patient presented to me with the verbal incoherence, tangential thinking, and repetitive speech that Trump now regularly demonstrates, I would almost certainly refer them for a rigorous neuropsychiatric evaluation to rule out a cognitive illness,” Friedman continues at the link in our bio. “Only careful medical examination can establish whether someone indeed has a diagnosable illness—simply observing Trump, or anyone else, from afar is not enough. For those who do have such diseases or conditions, several treatments and services exist to help them and their loved ones cope with their decline. But that does not mean any of them would be qualified to serve as commander in chief.”⁠

I was talking to my 85ish going blind former teacher step mom yesterday and she asked if I watched the debate. I said “yes” then she hit me with the “she got where she is by spreading her legs” and “I wish we could find two new candidates.” The bitched about the immigrants.

Did I say Port au Prince? I meant Springfield.

We ate cats.

Game over

Let’s talk about our plan. smart change of direction

She’s killing him on the race issue

She’s black and she puts out.