Jump to content

Horndog

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    999
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Horndog

  1. 11 minutes ago, Lobo said:

    So somebody just break it down for me.  What do we need against Costa and Panama?  And don't say 2 wins with a 9-goal differential.  What's realistic and what else needs to happen with the rest of that upper-half of the table?  

    Also, I do not care for the nation of Qatar. 

    Two ties should do it because of goal differential. 

  2. 1 hour ago, Hookem2147 said:

    I also look at Messinger a similar way that I look at Todd. Feasts on bad pitching, but Skyler is hitting below .225 for his career in Big 12 play. 

    But this year he trades three games hitting against Texas pitching for three games hitting against Kansas pitching.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 2
  3. 18 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

    Can someone walk me through how posting on Twitter a screenshot of a zoom call can be used to trace the location of the person on the other end of said zoom call

    Hell, the 9.95 crowd once traced Urban Meyer to a particular hotel at Horseshoe Bay based on nothing but the pattern of the window curtains. 

    • Haha 1
  4. 21 minutes ago, 'stache said:

    Dear Mr. Putin,

    Attached is a letter we received on March 2, 2022. We feel that you should be aware that some asshole is signing your name to stupid letters.

    Sincerely,

    Finland and Sweden

    Or the old classic:

    "FUCK YOU!  Strong letter to follow."

    • Haha 1
  5. 16 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

    Lousy tweet.

    Only the "custodian" of the document(s) who willfully destroys same is barred from office.

    Someone other than Trump would have been the custodian, I'm quite sure.

    "Defendant's argument regarding “custody” suffers from similar artificiality. There is no warrant for supposing, and no legislative history suggesting, that Congress meant to subject to punishment under section 2071 only those who are the custodians of records in the technical sense, such as clerks or librarians, but to permit others working in a government agency who have access to sensitive documents to destroy or alter them with impunity. The obvious purpose of the statute is to prohibit the impairment of sensitive government documents by those officials who have access to and control over them, and no court has ever held to the contrary."
     

    United States v. Poindexter, 725 F. Supp. 13, 20 (D.D.C. 1989)
    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...