Jump to content

Horndog

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Horndog

  1. The question was about her public statements. Those would not be privileged because by definition they are not communications between lawyer and client.
  2. "... more described in more detail ..." Could it be more redundant?
  3. Yep. And the "2A" card is a handwritten statement of the dotard's devotion to gun rights rather than an FBI evidence marker.
  4. Just glanced through the DOJ Brief, and there were a couple of interesting things I did not know: When the 15 boxes were returned earlier in the year, NARA found classified documents that had been "unfoldered" (i.e. taken out of their folders containing the classified markings) and were intermingled with other records. It is an accepted rule of nature that documents are inanimate and do not remove themselves from folders and envelopes. Some of the papers had been "torn up." The DOJ had "multiple sources" of information that classified records remained at MAL after the attorney's certification to the contrary. Per Chuck Rosenberg (former federal prosecutor) on MSNBC last night, not only are classified documents maintained in the brightly-colored large-font-labeled folders, but the documents themselves have individual classification markings for each paragraph. Once they are removed from the marked folders, anyone looking at the documents has immediate knowledge of their classification status.
  5. Quite likely. But my point is that the DOJ could have pushed back and required a stronger certification based on actual knowledge and without the qualifiers. Especially since this involved highly sensitive document.
  6. I'm surprised that DOJ accepted this Certification as an indication of compliance with the Subpoena. It has all sorts of indicators of unreliability. "I have been designated to serve as Custodian of Records" rather then "I am Custodian of Records". (Who made the designation? When?) "Based upon information that has been provided to me . . . " (What information? Who provided it? When?) The information is true "to the best of my knowledge." (What is the knowledge and how was it acquired?) This is hardly a document that can be used as a basis for perjury. It would not be considered as competent evidence in a civil case.
  7. I'm assuming your use of "blackmale" was not intentional with respect to Ladybugs.
  8. I think they moved the center field scoreboard from D-F.
  9. So is Elmo.
  10. He claimed he did 1000 situps and push-ups every day, or some such BS.
  11. Haven't read the Motion. Was it filed seeking emergency relief? If so, the pro hac vice screw-up is especially comical. If not, it is not even facially serious.
  12. As usual with the Dotard, it's mostly performative. 1. Take the offensive, no matter how absurd the position. 2. Change the public dialog and distract from the real issue. 3. When the Motion is dismissed, rail about the rigged system. It's not about actually getting a favorable ruling. It's about maximizing the role as victim.
  13. Herschel doesn't think for himself. He has no ability to think at all.
  14. Most Rs think he meant "coup d'etat", which they support.
  15. Chances are greater that Cruz has a vagina than Warren having a penis.
  16. There have been reports that the MAL surveillance tapes (obtained through subpoena) showed boxes being removed from the storage room - after their return had been requested. That's a pretty BFD.
  17. His hesitation was because he didn't want to say "no", then realizing that anything but an unequivocal denial would be tantamount to an admission of criminal conduct.
  18. Aggiehawg claims to be a retired lawyer with significant appellate experience. I wandered over there quite a bit during the post- election litigation orgy. Her takes were always laughably bad. She probably thinks Pence still has the power to ignore the electors.
  19. You are correct. One requirement for eligibility to be a Special Agent: Be able to obtain a Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) Clearance. https://www.fbijobs.gov/special-agents I learned something new today.
  20. Not at all. Just curious. I'm guessing that there was someone there with security clearance. But I don't recall seeing that mentioned in the dozen or so articles I've read.
  21. A thought has occurred to me concerning the search and seizure, and I haven't seen it discussed anywhere. The assumption is that some of the records retained by Trump were classified. But FBI agents would not have security clearance to see classified documents. But FBI agents would not have security clearance to see classified documents. It would seem that someone with a much higher security clearance, such as an intelligence official, would have to be present for the search. Has there been any reporting of such officials being there?
  22. But there has to be an actual question asked. The Q and A can be shown to the jury. If the depo only lasted an hour they probably didn't cover much ground.
×
×
  • Create New...