Second guess helped me
Wordle Unlimited 3/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Think you can do better? Try the same puzzle: https://www.wordleunlimited.com/?wardle=c2hvdWxkZXI=
As I watched that live, I was surprised that the cop didn't start shooting at the crowd chasing him up the stairs. I don't know what he knew as far as the location of Pence.
Green = correct. Yellow = in word but not in correct position. Purple = not in word.
The purple D boxes tell you that there is not a second D in the word.
Answer is drink. https://www.devangthakkar.com/wordle_archive/
I think some of the cast members read the speculation and fan art that's on there. Pretty funny.
The mods on that sub have tightened up the rules to try to prevent spoilers, but the show does drop on Amazon Prime at midnight. So if you browse the reddit between midnight and tomorrow night (and don't watch it tonight), be aware that spoilers do slip through in some of the posts.
Feels like all those months just knowing that Mueller was documenting mountains of evidence and keeping all those sealed indictments dry until the big moment. And then *popcorn fart*, in no small part due to Barr's actions to take over the narrative. LIke the coaching search where the AD is supposedly throwing up smoke screens and misdirection, only to hire someone with a .500 record. Certainly different circumstances, but we've seen this movie.
Always jealous of the feel that females (especially) have for sacred music. Seems so easy for them to throw little things into their playing that makes it great.
I'm sure the repetition and collaboration played a huge part in The Beatles developing their understanding of theory and in improving their ability to hear chords/harmonies/etc. Building their musical vocabulary. And a lot of it just came naturally for them.
Which Beatle(s) do you think had the most raw talent from a theory perspective -- apart from songwriting? Born with a good ear, ability to hear progressions & see chord relationships, etc.
If it depends on Congress doing the evil deed, don't both houses have to agree to object to a state's electors? If the Rs take the House and Senate in 2022, then what's to stop them from doing that?
I seem to remember a scenario like that being laid out in one of the news articles at the end of last year. Here's one of them: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/what-if-trump-refuses-concede/616424/
https://ballotpedia.org/Can_members_of_Congress_object_to_Electoral_College_results%3F_(2020)[quote]
When you're one of the only developed nations not to provide these services to your citizens (or stop the insane cruelty and sadism of things like mass incarceration), it might be time to look in the mirror and re-evaluate.
What kind of hassles were you worried about? Just curious. fwiw, I've seen the overqualified person come into a company and spend all his time talking about how they did it at his previous stops. Were you concerned that they would make up their own rules, or that they would spend all their time in the boss's office lobbying for changes?