BB65

I don’t think Ewers will ever be the bold leaders that VY or SE were. He doesn’t seem to have that personality. However I also think he came in with a lot of hype that he was not necessarily ready mentally to handle. I think Sarks offense is more complicated than any Ewers has tried to run. The offensive leaders were Bijan and Roschon and Ewers was not mentally comfortable replacing them in that role. After getting hurt, with exception of OU, he seemed to play scared. Scared of mistakes, scared of another injury and scared of failure. Other than the OU game I feel like Sark called games scared. After OU the play designs used in games were totally different. Less motion was used, passes down the seams were nonexistent and the imagination of the offense changed. I continue to not understand why. With Bijan and Roschon gone next year, Ewers will have to be the offensive team leader. Hopefully some of that was seen last night. The coaches need to teach him to be the leader. The majority of the OL next year came in with Ewers. That group needs to develop a nasty streak and become five Studdards from right to left. They need to be the enforcers of the offense. A skill player fucks up and they need to answer to the OL. One of the OLs fucks up and he has to answer to the other four. An opponent fucks with Ewers or a skill player all five OL need to address it.

It seems to be the exception not the rule for Texas WRs

When was the last time a Texas WR played with that kind of effort.

After the second dropped deep ball, worthy should have been benched. If he can’t get it done give the next guy a chance. Set a precedent for the entire team that if you are not producing someone else gets a chance. If a player doesn’t like it he can get in the mutha fucker.

Warm Chocolate, Chocolate chip from Tiffs.

Light the Tower Orange

Holy shit!!!!!

I wish everyone would go back to the first half of the ou game and watch the motion and misdirection of the offense. That was a brilliantly called game offensively. Those plays haven’t existed since that game. Now the game plan is to run to the right side of the offensive line 75% of the time and throw deep. No slip screens to wittington. No te down the seams. On occasion a deep out to the te or whit.

I wasn’t as bothered by the run play at the end of the game. I was bothered by the fact the run went to the short side of the field. Sark has a tendency to run to the short side. Bijan is an excellent cut back runner why limit the cut back by going to the short side.

Texas 42 OSU 38 22/31 293 yds

Fify

Texas - 31 ISU - 9 28 Rushes - 143 yards

Watch again and look where Sanders is when Ewers releases the ball. It’s the ole if the receiver is even he’s leavin that coaches try to teach. If Ewers is a half a second later that ball is picked or batted away by the deep guy.

No thanks I’ll take Ewers

UT 35 OU 30 X8/B5 238 yards

Can Dallas trade Dak for a #1 receiver?

No I’m just amazed that a team can continually be almost there and the other end of the play always works.

mentally handicapped

I made a comment to friends watching the game with me that Texas is always 1/2 step away from making the play. This goes for both Off and Def. This stat seems to confirm my statement at least for Def.

Texas 41 WVU 23 183 RB yards

Can it be roughing the passer when the passer hasn't pass the ball?

43-13 -Texas 147 WR yards

You mean like all the shit Saban accused him of earlier in the year?

Which is basically what I did. Let it play out and clean it up after the play.

That to me is why you get intentional grounding.