krutov

cool but this is dumb on both our parts. i've said my piece. i'm out. have a nice forum.

this is a proto-typical hugo troll post a blend of paranoid-delusion, wish-fulfillment and ego-gratification, with a slight measure of honest doubt to lend credibility to the whole performance. it really captures who you are.

i think homophobic insults might be your best hope for saving face. maybe chant them.

not a threat. a prediction.

quoted as exhibit a of what a bunch of credulous fools you are. it looks like i can't upload video here so i'll post a link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud9zBKJJQe4

so you think i may have adopted english spelling and idiomatic grammar and punctuation for a sock for 5 years, presumably just to throw detective mac off the trail when i finally unleashed the kraken? because i could have just started with a new account username on surly.

hi detective mac. before we go on with the interview, am i a target or a subject? will i be doxxed or swatted? employer notified? just asking questions.

canada has almost full control of immigration because of the ocean and the us as buffers, and because it is very difficult to be undocumented and access health care or work. it takes in more legal immigrants/refugees per capita than the us does, but it has almost zero illegal immigration. historically canada has almost no issues with either illegal immigration or refugee claims from the us. it's been the opposite with small numbers of folks flying to canada on a visa to sneak into the us because they can't get a us visa. but since trump was elected asylum seekers and illegal immigrants already in the us have started walking over the border into canada. this is now a problem in canada. there is a tent city at a quebec border crossing to handle the flow. the locals there and folks at the manitoba border are fed up with it. to contest this the canadian government is trying to get information warning prospective refugee claimants that they are likely going to be deported home. unofficially, this is to encourage them to go illegal and stay in the states.

well i do keep quoting you guys in my posts.

yet another shitty implementation of the "liar" troll move. some guy posts shit you disagree with -look for mistakes and call them lies. -look for any inferences he can't source to a nytimes reporter and call that making stuff up. -repeatedly call them a troll hopefully i will leave soon and you can go back to lapping hugo's asshole and waiting for the collusion rapture.

i get it. anyone who disagrees with you is a troll, and any time they make a mistake it's a lie. great trolling playbook. but if you fuck up implementing such a simple fucking plan and call someone a liar who didn't even make a mistake, i think you should be willing to take the abuse for it. you seem thin skinned.

Ha! The "creature" was in your mouth first, Smirnoff. i think i like you more than the others.

so you got nothing but the old "shut up troll because shut up" routine. got it. you seem dumb.

how does that hyphen you added work there? are we talking about language shenanigans committed in england now?

the lawyer's code of professional conduct? they are negotiating a voluntary interview and doj has told them in thos negotiations that trump is a subject not a target. i suppose you could assume trump's lawyers are incompetent and have not stipulated that they be updated if that status changes, or mueller has refused to commit to do that and trump's lawyers are still negotiating. those are very remote possibilities.