krutov

cool but this is dumb on both our parts. i've said my piece. i'm out. have a nice forum.

this is a proto-typical hugo troll post a blend of paranoid-delusion, wish-fulfillment and ego-gratification, with a slight measure of honest doubt to lend credibility to the whole performance. it really captures who you are.

i think homophobic insults might be your best hope for saving face. maybe chant them.

not a threat. a prediction.

quoted as exhibit a of what a bunch of credulous fools you are. it looks like i can't upload video here so i'll post a link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud9zBKJJQe4

so you think i may have adopted english spelling and idiomatic grammar and punctuation for a sock for 5 years, presumably just to throw detective mac off the trail when i finally unleashed the kraken? because i could have just started with a new account username on surly.

hi detective mac. before we go on with the interview, am i a target or a subject? will i be doxxed or swatted? employer notified? just asking questions.

canada has almost full control of immigration because of the ocean and the us as buffers, and because it is very difficult to be undocumented and access health care or work. it takes in more legal immigrants/refugees per capita than the us does, but it has almost zero illegal immigration. historically canada has almost no issues with either illegal immigration or refugee claims from the us. it's been the opposite with small numbers of folks flying to canada on a visa to sneak into the us because they can't get a us visa. but since trump was elected asylum seekers and illegal immigrants already in the us have started walking over the border into canada. this is now a problem in canada. there is a tent city at a quebec border crossing to handle the flow. the locals there and folks at the manitoba border are fed up with it. to contest this the canadian government is trying to get information warning prospective refugee claimants that they are likely going to be deported home. unofficially, this is to encourage them to go illegal and stay in the states.

well i do keep quoting you guys in my posts.

yet another shitty implementation of the "liar" troll move. some guy posts shit you disagree with -look for mistakes and call them lies. -look for any inferences he can't source to a nytimes reporter and call that making stuff up. -repeatedly call them a troll hopefully i will leave soon and you can go back to lapping hugo's asshole and waiting for the collusion rapture.

i get it. anyone who disagrees with you is a troll, and any time they make a mistake it's a lie. great trolling playbook. but if you fuck up implementing such a simple fucking plan and call someone a liar who didn't even make a mistake, i think you should be willing to take the abuse for it. you seem thin skinned.

Ha! The "creature" was in your mouth first, Smirnoff. i think i like you more than the others.

so you got nothing but the old "shut up troll because shut up" routine. got it. you seem dumb.

how does that hyphen you added work there? are we talking about language shenanigans committed in england now?

the lawyer's code of professional conduct? they are negotiating a voluntary interview and doj has told them in thos negotiations that trump is a subject not a target. i suppose you could assume trump's lawyers are incompetent and have not stipulated that they be updated if that status changes, or mueller has refused to commit to do that and trump's lawyers are still negotiating. those are very remote possibilities.

i'm willing to take that challenge from a guy clueless enough to still think i'm a jimmy-jazz-liar. you seem like the kind of complete dumbass bully who populates this thread, but time will tell which of us is a better poster. in the mean time, thanks for the negs, you pompous douchebag.

i didn't say i was a vic mackey on shaggy. i am not trying to be one of the shaggy cool gang, but just making the point that the russian sounding username is not a troll, trump related or otherwise.

i had this username for years on shaggy. long before trump. you can check. and the definition of "troll" used in this subforum seems to be unique on the internet. maybe this is jimmy-jazz again with his english language shenanigans? anyway, it does not mean people who disagree with you and think you are stupid and are prepared to debate you. otherwise, you are all trolls.

that's an interesting thing for you to be advocating. are you a fan of ken starr? he has a mandate to investigate crimes he uncovers in the course of investigating possible collusion with russia by the trump campaign. he does not have a mandate to go look for other crimes committed by the people he is investigating.

...that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.

so is your theory that "individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump" defines the class of people who may be investigated but does not define or limit the subject matter of the investigation, and thus such individuals may be investigated for "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government" at any time in their lives in relation to any subject matter? in other words the "links" and "coordination" being investigated do not need to to be related to "the campaign of president donald trump"? is that the reading? because to me they are limited to investigating "links" or "coordination" related to " the campaign" plus "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" of "the campaign" plus process crimes.

those are concerns about grammar and punctuation, not the english language. i think that makes you a "liar" according to the special jimmy-jazz definition of that word where it means "possibly mistaken but i haven't really checked very carefully". did i get the usage right? i do so want to learn new-speak.

that's a pretty stealthy but hillary.

i did not know that. cool.

if i hated america, it would be for the way it invented an internet to empower idiots like you to join groups of like minded idiots and confidently make asses of yourselves without repercussions and debase the english language while you are at it. but to humour you, please tell me, what was happening in the summer of 2016 with page, and papadopolous and halper? was that an "investigation of the trump campaign"? how about the fisa warrants on page in 2016? were those part of an "investigation of the trump campaign"?