Jump to content

Hank Chinaski

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3546
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hank Chinaski

  1. Goddamn these dipshits. 1) there’s no answer to who we hate the most. I’ll speak for myself. I hate everybody not named Texas. I don’t give a flying shit if everyone in the new conference hates us; fuck them. Texas is poison, Texas will piss everyone off, blah blah blah? Tough shit. That’s what the money is for. 2) the ou game is the most important one to be preserved. Not because we as a monolithic entity hate them the most, because it’s historically been the best and most meaningful game. I don’t think most of us hate the institution that is the university of Oklahoma (their athletic programs, sure), but I fucking loathe everything about Baylor; that doesn’t mean I give a single fuck about ever playing them again. It actually means I’d prefer not to ever associate with that actual cesspool. 3) they talk about the last decade as though it has been some sort of ascent for their program and has made Texas jealous…what the ever living holy fuck are they talking about? They haven’t done a goddamned thing. It was a golden opportunity for them to do just that - establish themselves as something more than a decent football program, because Texas has been shitty and they had a recruiting advantage. And they’ve done fuck-all with it. They’re exactly the same as they ever were. They’ve pissed it away. Texas will eventually get its shit together, but we gave them a decade-plus to pull ahead and they haven’t. No matter how much they keep repeating it. They haven’t. And what always gets me is their collective victim complex. Christ what a bunch of titty-babies.
  2. @Wulaw Horn is on vacation in the Caribbean but the Breathing Orange Fire podcast is now dropping on tuesdays and the new episode is up…entertaining episode discussing advanced metrics in a way that isn’t math-heavy and is relatable to the Astros…I think these guys do a great job and I listen every week… Spotify: Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-7-stats-and-such-but-not-too-much-math/id1683955456?i=1000615019177
  3. Rangers are legit. I’m not seeing anything that makes me think their first 2 months are smoke and mirrors. None of their offensive players are producing way over their heads, other than Heim, who has already started coming back to earth. Their lineup is good. Their rotation I think is good and probably gets deGrom back. The one thing that may catch up with them is that their pitchers don’t strike out a lot of guys. Maybe that catches up to them, maybe it doesn’t. Their bullpen also isn’t great, though it’s generally the easiest place to bolster in-season. The Astros (minus Brantley, Garcia, Urquidy, McCullers) don’t look like a much better team than the Rangers to me. I think they’re pretty even.
  4. Holy shit. That’s gonna be hard for Abreu to “top”.
  5. What are the worst FA contracts ever signed? Abreu could get into the conversation. Right now, it looks like Strasburg (7 years / $245mm) is in the driver’s seat. He’s in year 4 and has produced 0.0 fWAR. He hasn’t played at all in 2023. Rendon also got 7/$245 at the same time. This is year 4 and he has 4.0 fWAR so far. Abreu only got $60mm but is at -1 fWAR. I guess I’d still rather have his contract than Strasburg’s. But good lord, he’s making that money (for the next two years too) to produce worse than what you could reasonably expect from a AAA journeyman. I am getting to the point where I’m now perversely interested to see just how bad he can be, and just how long we’ll keep trotting him out there. Chris Davis had -2.6 fWAR in 2018…I kinda want to see if Abreu can actually be worse than that. I think he can do it; i mean shit, Davis hit 16 HR that year…
  6. Jesus Christ Altuve was a top-5 hitter in MLB last season and has played 5 games. Even I can’t find anything to bitch about here.
  7. @Wulaw Horn mentioned it in his latest podcast episode (which is awesome by the way) - it is really difficult to actually be at -1.0 fWAR this early in the season. But our big FA signing has been able to defy the odds and pull it off.
  8. MLB draft, man. But hey, this team won a couple WS since that pick was made. More depressing is the fact that in 1991 the club had Bagwell, Biggio, Schilling (fuck him but he was really good), Lofton, Finley and Gonzalez (who both posted 5-win seasons with the Astros), plus Kyle and all those other pitchers that came up. Good lord we shipped off some serious talent.
  9. I thought it was a game against Cal that we lost anyway.
  10. Jesus Christ, Taylor Doyle. I remember seeing his photo at the time thinking that he looked like the kid from Dawson’s Creek, which didn’t give me much confidence that he’d turn into some badass OL. And he was apparently in a wheel chair. Wtf Mack. Also, reading all of this has put me in a bad mood. Fuck you all.
  11. Yeah that’s narrative BS. There is not a single reason for anyone to believe that team was “soft.”
  12. Again, I think Kyle Tucker or any other player is interested in signing the best contract he can. Now, I assume what you’re actually asking is whether I really think the next 2 years of sunk cost on Abreu and Montero have a meaningful impact on what the Astros would be willing to offer him on a possible extension. To that, I have no idea, but I think the fact that that money is already spent doesn’t help.
  13. The bottom line is he parted ways with a GM without a plan to replace him. The Abreu deal appeared to be an overpay (and yes, a year too long) even before we knew he was finished as a productive player. Everyone thought the Montero deal was an overpay at the time. Brantley was injured. These were bad signings that may have been avoidable if he had had a plan for the off-season.
  14. It has an effect on payroll for the next two years, which has an effect on how money will be allocated, which has an effect on what you can offer to players, be it Kyle Tucker or whoever else could potentially be signed to fill out a better roster. I don’t purport to know what he or anybody else “wants to do,” but it’s a pretty good bet that what they want to do is sign the best contract they can.
  15. The point is that money was spent stupidly because someone decided he didn’t need a GM, and that will affect how future money is allocated.
  16. He actively decided to not have cohesive front office leadership and pretended to be a GM this past offseason. Every signing he made has been a fucking disaster in 2023 and the club will be worse off for them in future seasons as well. We’d be better off if he actually spent no money at all. When this team fizzles out in the wild card round and then we wonder why we aren’t extending Tucker or why we aren’t in on useful FAs in the off-season, it’ll be fun to remember that we’ve already spent that money - over $30 million - on 2 replacement-level players when Crane was playing GM.
  17. One would think…
  18. Meh. It’s a 7-game series. The Astros were probably better, but the degree to which they were better doesn’t really make much of a meaningful difference in a short series.
  19. I mean yeah, same, because the Astros will never have a better team than that one. But that WS wasn’t really some massive upset. WAS had the best record in baseball over the last 2/3 of that season, had very high-end offensive players (Soto, an actually healthy Rendon, Turner, etc.), and a HOF starter plus Strasburg healthy and pitching up to his potential for the only time in his career (don’t forget how elite he was as a prospect). Corbin was actually good at that point too. The rotations were basically a wash in 2019. If those teams played 100 times, I’d guess the Astros would have won a few more than 50, but probably not that many more.
  20. No sir…after yesterday, no way in hell I’m commenting positively about a lineup…
  21. Or…just play Chas in CF, with his team control and 111 career wRC+. Dubon is the backup IF.
  22. Look, I don’t hate Machete, and I tend to be less bothered by his PT than, say, @Wulaw Horn is. That said, he’s not suddenly a good hitter. He’s a 75-ish wRC+ guy, which is poor. Diaz probably would perform better than that, and he’s shown that he can handle C defensively. As such, I do think that Diaz should play more than 1 out of every 5 games. Machete’s bat isn’t a huge problem unless it’s in the lineup the same day you’re sitting Altuve and Chas and other regulars.
×
×
  • Create New...