Human beings are shades of grey. Rex consistently has, and is right now, showing a very basic human tendency to try and analyze everything in a very black and white way. Grey is too complex and too uncertain. Black and white is simpler, even if it's not a true reflection of reality. It's a very simple, yet very powerful, defense mechanism called splitting in therapeutic terms.
In some ways, I'm sympathetic to his point of view. It's much easier, as a denizen of a Western country, to view Israel as an unambiguous good that must be championed and Palestinians (and by extension, the Arab world at large) as an unambiguous bad that must be destroyed. Drilling down past the surface, past what we've all been fed by Western media for our entire lives (or in Armybrat's case, a small percentage of his) uncovers a lot of uncomfortable truths about the situation in Israel, and the region in general, that paint everyone involved (including us, especially us) with many different shades of grey. At some point, it becomes far too difficult to view the conflict in such black and white terms.
Most people are either content to simply lap up the mixture of truths, half-truths, deflections, and flat out bald-faced lies that Western media feeds us, and shove every actor involved into neat little black and white boxes. I try to stay as informed as I have time to in order to keep myself seeing the shades of grey rather than the black and white. I try to take as optimistic an approach as I can to the future of Israel and occupied Palestine, but it's difficult to say the least. Most people, again, choose to see only the black and white and conclude that some kind of nebulously defined total victory is necessary, hence the multiple posters in this thread that advocate for ethnic cleansing with their full chest (some without even realizing it, it seems). As if repeating the mistakes of the past is a way to a better future.
I will say that I greatly appreciate @InkaUtexas's posting, yours, @bolverk and others, and @956 Worldwide though we frequently disagree. Inka in particular is extremely well read on the subject and the history of the region and I enjoy his insights every day. You yourself held a fairly black and white view of this subject nearly a year ago, albeit a more sympathetic and humane view than a lot of other people do, but you're smart/humble enough to seek out knowledge that may alter your world view when you're unsure of yourself. People like Rex purposefully avoid knowledge that may alter their world view, because it's too upsetting. I don't even necessarily fault them all that much for it, because it is a demonstrably hard thing to do. Hell, I should know, 15-20 years ago I was a dumbass central TX hillbilly, listening to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark fuckin' dumbshit Levin. Hooting and hollering when we were slaughtering a million people in Iraq based on a pure lie. I don't even like to think about all the dumb shit I believed.
This is not to place myself on a pedestal above. I have plenty of faults, blind spots, and knowledge gaps. I learn shit every day reading this board. I am usually very bad at articulating my thoughts in a way that isn't frequently abrasive or otherwise difficult to digest by others. I frequently think I'm a lot more well read on a particular aspect of X subject than I am, and often have to stop and take a break to better inform myself or collect myself. I wish I had a fraction of your, or Inkas, or @SL Xpress, or any number of other posters' ability to elucidate my thoughts in any sort of consistently palatable way.
Anyway, I have no idea why I wrote this post.