Jump to content

Bobby_Batronic

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bobby_Batronic

  1. I made some reference to that with Connor Williams. It’s a balance. It’s be nice not to sacrifice the season to reassess that balance going forward. We’ll see where the injuries take us. Sterns’ loss won’t sabotage the season. Ingram bing out for any extended period hurts us badly starting in week two.
  2. Herman is as guilty of doing stupid shit as the next guy. Remember that year where he had to reassign his whole offensive staff because he made some poor hires/coaching assignments? Yeah. That was last year. He does seem to learn from most of his mistakes. I’ll give him that. And no, I wouldn’t fault the coaches for a guy tweaking a knee or ankle in non contact drills. Because that’s a reasonable ask of a thin position group. Less so when we’re hurting our own guys at positions where we can ill afford a loss in the name o physicality. Like I said, beat each other up when we’ve got depth. However, one live scrimmage making the physicality difference or preparing another unit to tackle elite backs during the season. Yeah. I don’t buy that. Particularly when we’re turning to a walk-on if any other thing happens with that position group.
  3. It won’t matter a lick if they are or aren’t if we’ve got some walk-on in the game at RB because we made sure to tackle our thin RB group to the ground in a scrimmage. It’s a circular argument. There’s a balance. Again, knock people’s dicks in the dirt when we have depth. Sterns is a survivable loss. Ingram’s loss is probably worth a L or three on the schedule.
  4. Fify. We’re literally one injury of any kind away from a walk-on seeing snaps at RB.
  5. Wanna tackle a WR? Knock his ass down. Wanna tackle a RB when we only have three on the roster? And only two of those are meaningful contributors? Maybe we should be smarter. Again, I’m all for physical practices and all our scrimmages. But gotdam, there are certain positions we can’t afford to lose. I assure you Sam wasn’t tackled to the ground. And for the same reason.
  6. Maybe it’s folly to have all out practices when the roster still isn’t loaded for bear. We keep losing key cogs with little depth behind them each preseason. Got 4 ballers in the RB room? Let’s go make snot bubbles. Have 3 scholly RB’s, one decent LT, or I can’t remember who this happened to last year? And perhaps we should seek to protect that position a bit. Hopefully the prognosis is good.
  7. That team that is in the process of dethroning Bama from its run doesn’t seem to care much about TOP, and instead has decided to run as many plays as possible against Alabama when the meet in the title game. Clempson or some such.
  8. You’re probably thinking of Victor Ike. Ivan Williams spent one fine evening running roughshod over the UNL defense of the PA pass from Simms.
  9. I have a feeling any visitor to practice of note gets run past the Co-op for gear for photography/publicity reasons. Or more likely, they’re asked their shirt size and a staffer appears fresh from the Co-op with some gear.
  10. LaTech’s offense is extremely pedestrian. The only way they put up 28 is for the entire secondary to fall down on the same play. Repeatedly.
  11. I’ll settle for double the production then.
  12. I know, hard for your ilk fathom. But that's par for the course.
  13. A long time ago on another website the CR was hardcore conservative with only a few liberal posters sticking their nose out. I venture over from time to time to see how the left is feeling about their current candidates. I once engaged in a conversation about universal income, because it was a new concept to me, but when I asked about funding got crickets with an admitted $1T shortfall. Sounds about right.
  14. Since you asked, I didn't vote for any of them. Trump didn't impress me, I didn't like Hillary's politics and Gary Johnson couldn't remember a thing when asked a serious question. And yes, the current batch of democratic candidates have veered far left. I think you don't know me, and made a stupid assumption.
  15. You're right. He's perfectly sane by mental health industry standards. He just has a penchant for killing a lot of people when the mood strikes him. You call that evil. I'd say his head isn't in proper order. Don't get me wrong, I believe in evil, but you can't tell me that you think his thinking is normal even if mental health professionals deem it sane. Don't try to be an ass. You're not good at it. I said that there's no widespread white supremacy movement. Not that this asshole wasn't a white supremacist.
  16. It's not dangerous at all. Enough with the continual f'ing hyperbole. It's real simple. No person of sound mind short of being engaged in actual warfare even thinks about killing a lot of people. Yes, its' evil. Next someone will argue about what if they perceive they're at war because of external factors etc. If you lack the kind of discernment that your perceived victimhood justifies mass murder then something clearly isn't connecting upstairs. If such thoughts every actually cross your mind. If you spend one second fantasizing about it. If you spend an iota on the logistics of it then you need to seek help. Something isn't right in your head.
  17. This would be me with a slight modification to your list.
  18. I wouldn't argue that. But they are not right in the head either in the classic sense of the word.
×
×
  • Create New...