From a cursory search, he seems like a quasi-intellectual who has a lawyers knack for trying to establish a niche for himself by reinterpreting what was settled many decades prior and he pretends to know the mind of the authors of the Constitution. But his ideas seem to falter under rudimentary scrutiny from what I can tell. If we want to be strict constitutionalists, then let's do it. Tell me his address and I will open my mustard-gas manufacturing facility right next door to his home and kids. I mean, where does the constitution claim I cannot manufacture chemicals and use industrial fans to direct the flow of the waste?
His free speech stuff is equally idiotic. Since the founders could have no predicted that there would be a megaphone of advertising, we should be allowed to slander/libel one another. I am sure if I created AI images of him before and after raping animals and children he would have no problem with this, especially if I had the resources to blast it 24-7 on banners, websites, articles, and tv/radio-stations. And then when someone caves in his skull with a metal dildo, I am sure he would be happy to know that I can wash my hands of this, because it is constitutionally protected speech.
Administrative power rose up likely out of necessity to get experts in regions to help set standards because of the complexity and expertise required. The idea of creating separations in drilling oil wells was largely because of SpindleTop where ignorant masses wanted to get their piece of the pie and in doing so, fucked everything up by overdrilling the formation, damaging the environment both in terms of water and air contamination. Yeah, environmental concerns dating back to the early 1900s in this state was a thing.