Ha! Sorry, I wasn't implying you directly with the Ted Cruz comment but I do think that perception exists within some segments of our community and our government. We love to build up our adversaries, which I supposed helps us not underestimate them, but we often go too far. China has its own cultural issues with their little emperors and with the emphasis on single male heirs, losing men in a useless conflict is going to have huge social implications and force China into another crisis given their limited welfare program (according to Wiki).
While they do indeed study and copy equipment from others, their initial use will likely be fairly underwhelming as they are not experienced in putting it into action. Just like how Ukraine ran out the first gen Bradleys out into minefields and while they were successful in keeping the crews alive, they had to adapt to the tactics the equipment was designed for. China supposedly has issues with carrier launches/landings and while they will eventually figure it out, those things should not be taken for granted. Sure they copied our hovercraft, but can they actually protect it and deploy it? How can they defend assets around the world with such a limited range on their Navy? Sure they can eventually overwhelm Taiwan, but the cost to China is going to be high and their ability to continue to project power out towards Japan and India will be compromised. Plus. there is another major issue at stake. China's economy is heavily tied to the U.S. as a trading partner. Other nations would gladly jump at the opportunity to make rubber dogshit for us. It would cause us both pain, but a manufacturing center which loses its customers is going to have a much harder time surviving than a customer who loses its manufacturer but also retains the knowledge to set up shop elsewhere.
But that is just like my uninformed opinion man. I could (and probably am) be wrong. (PS thanks for the fun talk/distraction) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.