Jump to content

Bozo_Casanova

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    14123
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Bozo_Casanova

  1. Good Tsar, bad boyars. Nobody beats the riz
  2. I sort of made my peace with this last night. I am and will remain a Mavs Fan For Life, and I really like a lot of these players. But this organization is not the Dallas Mavericks anymore. They are Las Vegas Sands Corp, and I don’t have any more of a bond to that than LAs Vegas Sands does to us or to the city of Dallas.
  3. What you don’t understand is that 1) it’s aggregated in the graph and 2) it makes your point even weaker this is basically you right now:
  4. keep fucking that chicken
  5. Fun fact: The Mavs allowed 120 points zero times in 22 games played in the 2024 playoffs.
  6. I can’t be mad at these players. They play hard. Lol at Nico side eyeing the TV Cameras when AD went to the bench hurt again.
  7. The most idiotic whatabout defense so far:
  8. You said it wasn’t the hill to die on. My dude, Paul Revere was arrested 250 years ago TODAY. If putting limits on the head of state isn’t worth defending, nothing is.
  9. Too many words. @JBJ - the White House and president are defying the law under the constitution and an order of the United States Supreme Court. Either you oppose that or you want a king. Which is it?
  10. The statement quoted above is also pure delusion.
  11. Um, you talked about “stats [showing] how common black on white violent crime is.” Your data show that it is extremely uncommon. Was that not your intent?
  12. So what you are saying that black on white violent crime is extraordinarily uncommon. Great job proving my point.
  13. Super weird. And Louisiana, you say?
  14. Well that’s the difference between how you and I observe economic and monetary policy. You look where they point and I watch what their hands are doing. There there.
  15. Oh, I don’t know, I think @Anastasis is, broadly speaking, in favor of stepping back from global centrality, (or dismantling the global American Empire, if you prefer) and in favor of de-dollarization as the mechanism of achieving that. He probably sees the current Republican project as the most likely way to get from A to B. What I think he doesn’t understand is the risk to himself and his family this poses, or the very real risk of worldwide human calamity and political violence that will likely result in the anarchic interregnum between the American Empire and whatever comes next. We are at least as likely to drown the Tree of Liberty in blood as to simply water it, and that’s what he and others like him don’t get. They think they are special.
  16. Stop it
  17. No, I think we agree that a tarriffs on the import of products where we need to protect strategic capacity in a handful of key areas from dumping or being undercut by subsidy make sense. But that's not what Trump did in 2017 and it's not what we are doing now. This will badly damage our interests and radically weaken our economic leverage in any negotiation.
  18. Sure, in the imagination of neurotics, racists, paranoids and dupes. But in the real world where most of us live that's nonsense.
  19. No. This idea is entirely a framing device used by the non-business general news media to put the current tarriff regime into some kind of relative context. The 2017 tarriffs have been an unmitigated disaster. They just seem relatively minor in comparison in terms of the scale of disaster.
  20. US and European equity, commodity, and bond markets closed. Tokyo, Shanghai and street drug markets all open on normal hours. I celebrate Ted Nugents entire catalog
  21. Again, this comparison is so bad and silly that you literally cannot be serious. For the record, the previous round of agricultural tariffs also didn’t “work” and cost us global export market share we will never get back, but do you actually not understand how raising tariffs* from ~20% on China and ~3% on the rest of the world to 124% on China and 10%+ on the rest of the world represent not only a fundamental change in strategy and a huge break from 80 years of unbroken bipartisan national policy? Are you so captivated by the view from within the depths of your own lower bowel that you that from where you sit Peter Navarro is playing it straight, but all the market professionals and business managers dealing with this madness are crisis actors? Brother you’re on an island with Tommy Tuberville, MarkWayne Mullin and Stephen Miller. You’re not in a position to lecture anybody about “transparent politics,” but it must be tough on the spine, carrying that much water on just one side. *again, also pretty dumb outside of those few categories where we need to maintain strategic capacity and China is subsidizing low prices with the express intent of disrupting American production.
  22. no, but seriously are you for real with these questions?
  23. what an utterly inapt comparison, are you serious?
×
×
  • Create New...