No. It's more like this:
Years zero: Consensus develops that we have an issue on the horizon, council tasks staff and commissions to gather input and develop plans
Year 1: Staff and commissions gather input and develop plans
Year 2: NEIGHBORS FREAK OUT! Council backpedals, tasks commissions and staff to include neighborhood cranks in process
Year 3-5: Staff tweaks plan while waiting out war of attrition between factions participating in the process
Year 4: 1/3 of council is replaced, running on "changing the culture of city hall," and "including the voices of the neighborhoods." New council members appoint neighborhood cranks to key commissions
Year 5: staff and city management bring compromise plans to council. Council passes on 1st reading, and schedule months of hearings to gather feedback. NEIGHBORS FREAK OUT! Council decides to start over, sends back to staff and commissions to gather input and develop plans
Year 5: staff and commissions develop plans
Year 6: NEIGHBORS FREAK OUT! Council backpedals, tasks commissions and staff to include neighborhood cranks in process
Year 7-9: Staff tweaks plan while waiting out war of attrition between factions participating in the process
Year 8: 1/3 of council is replaced, running on "changing the culture of city hall," and "including the voices of the neighborhoods." New council members appoint neighborhood cranks to key commissions
Year 9: staff and city management bring compromise plans to council. Council passes on 1st reading, and schedule months of hearings to gather feedback. NEIGHBORS FREAK OUT! Council decides to start over, sends back to staff and commissions to gather input and develop plans
eventually you find yourself in a bond year and whatever bullshit on the table at that moment winds up in front of the public, CHEAPSKATES FREAK OUT, and it's a coin flip from there
repeat ad infinitum