Vince_McCoy_Williams
-
Posts
393 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Vince_McCoy_Williams
-
-
He is very strong on gun rights! My number 1 issue and now we have a 5-4 court cemented for a generation that will uphold and protect the 2nd Amendment. Couldn't be happier. Suck it gun grabbers.
-
13 hours ago, bad_teammate said:
I agree that all immigration should be merit based. I have a feeling we'd disagree on how to determine merit.
"Are you a breathing not-criminal who wants to be here?"
If the answer is "yes", you merit a quick path to citizenship.
--
I am too old and have too much money to be ANTIFA. The rotten and broken leftist brain I have is encased in a body and wardrobe that screams, "Compassionate conservative!"
I just like those kids a lot.
And I certainly don't have the muscle of this studly young person.
You need to watch a video on immigration. We cant fix all of the world's problems by taking in anyone and everyone who wants to come here. That is a good way to dilute our country's wealth and undermine the current citizens. Think about it, hundreds of millions of people could pour into our country and we still wouldn't even put a dent in the world's poverty problem. And then our country would be flooded and ruined.
People can get in line and wait there turn at the discretion of our country; it is our right to determine who enters our country. I have zero sympathy for those who illegally immigrate. If you don't have borders, you don't have a country.
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
I hate to disagree with you but much of Trump’s base think women shouldn’t even have the right to vote.
Such a lying drama queen. This is why libs lose.
- 1
-
3 hours ago, lemonlime said:
I gotta disagree. My biggest concern with the Supreme Court pick is I think the only thing Trump cares about is picking someone who is loyal to Trump. Trump doesn't give a fuck about anything, including judicial philosophy, competence, issues including Roe. He only cares about a justice who will stop investigations, say he can't be subpoenaed, can't be called into court, and can pardon himself. That's all Dersh. It's also why if he can get away with it, I think he'd appoint Pirro, Tiffany, his sister, etc. And this is a bigger problem than say, overturning Roe v. Wade. Basic policy stuff will take years to get to the Court and can ultimately be undone. If the court okays Trump's corruption, it could lead to a constitutional crisis that could destroy the nation.
I think Pods is right, though, and it will be Kavanaugh. First, because Kavanaugh is the most likely to let Trump get away with shit who can also be confirmed. Second, because I think Trump wants a white man for the optics.
Never forget to take your meds LOL
- 2
-
11 minutes ago, formermav43 said:
I don’t see what’s particularly unnerving about that.
There isnt anything, just more conspiracy bullshit
-
25 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Ain’t that nice...
So instead of a man who is 80 years old and just wants to retire under a Republican president, you are suggesting some sort of payoff or foul play because he didnt try to hang on longer?
Hugo, you keep being you, you provide me laughs on a daily basis
-
16 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:
It’s called being at work, try it.
Ok I’m wrong about that instance, but for you to truly believe that trump is somehow fighting for individual rights by nominating Gorsuch, you’re an idiot. He chose from a list that others gave him. The other points still stand. How you think getting rid of the individual mandate will somehow increase prosperity is hilarious. We’ll see when everyone premiums are higher this time next year
I trust Gorsuch to act in a manner that favors individual rights. Hopefully that will continue to pan out.
Also, forcing someone to buy insurance or face a mandatory penalty is an invasion of liberty. So I think you have that a bit twisted, as it has nothing to do with cost of premiums and everything to do with the government forcing you to buy a product or face a penalty. That is a step for liberty.
Edit: calling me an idiot after that whopper of a misfire on Gorsuch is pretty silly. Try to use less ad hominems.
- 2
-
7 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:
Fuck him and all who stand with him.Yes, yes, let the hate flow through you.
- 2
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:
I’ve seen hundreds of your posts on this site and the last. You, or at least the character you play online, are irredeemable. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.You view other humans who simply have a different view of politics as "irredeemable." I hope you can find peace with your life at some point. It must be heard to carry that much hate and contempt in your heart. I truly feel sorry for you.
-
8 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:
Legitimately cannot even comprehend the evil one must possess to go on air and make a statement like that.
Fox News is a terrorist organization.Good god. You are fucking psycho. Hannnity is a reactionary clown, like many other attention grabbing journalists. To classify Fox News as a terrorist organization just shows people you have a few screws loose.
- 2
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
The congressmen getting shot event was certainly a step on this shitty path. That's the level of dialogue, understanding, and compromise we've got. ZERO. There are only those on "your side," and enemies. That doesn't end well. You can pretend otherwise. Which makes you part of the problem.
I dont view you as an enemy! I see you as a fellow countryman and I have nothing but love in my heart for this country and it's people. We may disagree on how to get there but we all want to see America be great.
I think that is your problem. You see Trump voters as irredeemable, or "pieces of shit," as you just put it. It allows you to enter into the deluded negative mindset known as Trump Derangement Syndrome, where you dehumanize us by thinking that we are racist "pieces of shit." You need some introspection.
- 2
-
9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
No. Internet trolls don't bug me.
Dead journalists and imprisoned kids separated from their parents do, though. That's because I"m not a complete piece of shit, so I doubt that you and I can engage productively on this.
Well you are overreacting to Twitter posts from a shooting, that ***gasp***, could have posted by Russian trolls to stoke division. And you are falling for it, what you are most of afraid of, you have now fallen victim to.
FYI, crazy dem dude shooting at our congressman is not good either, but you dont hear me saying the country is on some path to hell because a whackjob shoots someone. Get real.
- 1
-
17 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
There's no turning back from the course this country is on.
So fucking dramatic. If a small minority of internet trolls affect you this much, life must be tough on you.
- 3
- 3
-
14 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:
I don’t know if this guy was alt right or a Trump supporter but I know a lot of both are celebrating it on Twitter.
Oh come the fuck on, an extremely small minority of fucking psychopaths might be applauding this. You are a clown if you think "a lot" of trump supporters would be happy about this. Get a grip
- 2
-
2 hours ago, SubliminalHorn said:
And didn’t VMW’s boy Gorsuch dissent in the Carpenter case recently? Oh yeah, Gorsuch sure is for maximizing personal liberty. Like I said, never vote again.
2 hours ago, Vince_McCoy_Williams said:You obviously didn't read his dissent lol.
"Although Gorsuch also wrote a dissent, his opinion is similar to a concurring opinion because he agreed with the majority’s decision but disagreed with the majority’s reasoning.[40] Gorsuch agreed that law enforcement agencies need a warrant to obtain cell phone data; however, he disagrees that the Fourth Amendment provides the right to a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” Instead, Gorsuch argues that cell phone location records are the property of cell phone owners and under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement agencies cannot search a person’s property without a warrant."
Maybe you're the one who shouldn't vote lol
Crickets
-
18 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:
I'm gonna go out on a limb and suggest that it's not entirely defensible to have wholly distinct roles for the House and the Senate yet have huge differences in effective leverage (either per capita or on the whole) in the two different groups. A better blend seems prudent. For one thing, the country is nearly 100X the size it was when the Constitution was ratified. California is 65X larger than Wyoming. California gets 53 Representatives and 2 Senators, and Wyoming gets 1 Representative and 2 Senators? How is that gonna play out in an impeachment trial in the Senate?
Still hanging on to that impeachment pipe dream lol
-
33 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:
And didn’t VMW’s boy Gorsuch dissent in the Carpenter case recently? Oh yeah, Gorsuch sure is for maximizing personal liberty. Like I said, never vote again.
You obviously didn't read his dissent lol.
"Although Gorsuch also wrote a dissent, his opinion is similar to a concurring opinion because he agreed with the majority’s decision but disagreed with the majority’s reasoning.[40] Gorsuch agreed that law enforcement agencies need a warrant to obtain cell phone data; however, he disagrees that the Fourth Amendment provides the right to a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” Instead, Gorsuch argues that cell phone location records are the property of cell phone owners and under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement agencies cannot search a person’s property without a warrant."
Maybe you're the one who shouldn't vote lol
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:
You have no argument. You threw up some vague ideas and presented those as reasons he is fighting for individual liberty and for why there is so much prosperity. You are stupid. and I thought you had a life and can’t post here often? Weird, ever since yesterday you’ve been all over the boards with your moronic posts. Sounds like the poster that said you only show up when your team has some sort of victory might be right.
Argumentum ad hominem, guess you gotta start somewhere when you have no substantive argument
- 1
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:
Jesus you are seriously stupid. Holy hell. Please turn in your voter registration immediately.
Quite a retort, really deconstructed my argument
-
8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:
And he's fine with that. Prefers it, in fact.
Everyone who doesn't agree with me is a racist/ sexist/ misogynist/ xenophobe,/ bigot. Still resorting to the same tired ass tactics when yalls arguments fall apart.
-
5 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:
Are you ever going to list how the traitor is fighting for individual liberty and is the cause of all the prosperity you are seeing
Appointing gorsuch, eliminating the AHA mandate, less taxes, defending gun rights, closing our borders, etc.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
I agree. It is a great platform and will make America better.
You're a few cents short of a dollar.
-
9 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:
So, just to keep track of it all - so far just on this thread we've seen you advocate for "changing" our racist constitution, abolishing the electoral college, and importing as many voters as possible. That's a great platform. Very "Common Sense".
This is normal for liberals, they think these are common sense positions. It's scary how blind they are.
- 1
-
19 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:
At least you are honest about it - that this is, nor ever was about altruism, but rather a way to simply import more votes.
Supreme Court Justice Kennedy to Retire at the end of July
in Cloak Room
Posted
You cant wait till he dies? Don't sound too excited you sick fuck. Seek help.
Liberals, such tolerant and compassionate people.