You’re losing me Ana. I understand the points you are trying to make but it seems like nitpicking. You take issue with the wording?
Under Medicare for all I’m sure there will be exceptions and gaps in extreme cases. Overall millions of lives will be positively affected. Still a vast improvement over the current system. Under Medicare for all there will be OOP expenses like off-formularies. Again I’d wager still a vast improvement over the current system. Bernie’s bill isn’t describing a no OOP expenses pipe dream. It is plainly stated we have our preferred medicines that will be paid for but if you have your own preferences expect to pay extra.
Is the current system efficient or accountable? What is your choice between Medicare for all and the current system? I understand you have your own perspective on how things should work but who is proposing this? You trust these individuals to do what they say they will do? You trust the markets to not be profit driven? I’ll help you out by quoting you from your link to the prescription drug thread. “Problem is, too many entrenched interests with deep lobby pockets and a totally dysfunctional political system.”
That’s because it’s the best option available. Why would they give it up?