Jump to content

CowboyFred

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1154
  • Joined

Everything posted by CowboyFred

  1. This is pretty much everyone I know regardless of their thoughts on Covid. yup. I'll wait until politicians and the like have received theirs before I get in line for mine. I don't mind not going out for a few months more.
  2. fucking double post shit. fuck you bob stoops
  3. 1234. With regards to trump, I can't get over the fact that some are totally fine with the tearing down the prestige of the office of the president and ripping any level of respect we had on a global stage or even with your average citizen because "its funny" (I shit you not I've gotten that reasoning from at least 3 different people). Aside from politics, I tend to believe I'm really easy going and can get along with people from all walks of life.
  4. Well yeah and the felon currently serving as AG. Forget it, I'm rolling. this is something that really drives me fucking crazy. also the fact this his venue challenge has gone on so fucking long.
  5. not a vocal leftist but wholly expected LP to sit this one out. good on them keeping this shit up
  6. that is what I have noticed as well. Obama being president really broke some of them. I have some friends that argue about the economy and tax policies of the 2 candidates where they don't make anywhere near the 400K that will be newly taxed and would actually benefit if trump's tax plan was rolled back but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  7. I just came back from a wedding in Edna and I saw 1 Biden sign on the way back to San Antonio. That whole area is trumpville highlighted by the 70 year old uncle or grandpa wearing a trump 2020 cap to the reception. I just find it so weird the obsession with trump that you would wear the cap to a wedding but I guess.
  8. This is where I'm at with him. Just finished (over a few days) his 5 hour show with Duncan Tressel and it was great. Now the one recently with that mma Kennedy guy was a little too conspiracy theory for me. Bill Burr's most recent one with him was fantastic. Especially when Burr told him to shut up about the mask thing because they're not scientists so there is no point in going there. I also agree with others in that I'm not going to Joe for politics. I'm going for him (along with his guest) to entertain me and provide some background noise mostly.
  9. Okay Karen. You'll be fine with 4 more years on non socialism. Says the guy that most probably took that free socialist handout also called the PPP loan for his failing o&g business but you never hear that kinda talk from the right. Corporate socialism is the only acceptable kind of socialism for the right because it’ll all trickle down...
  10. this is what cracks me up about people railing against Biden for being in public office for so long...
  11. and lots and lots of bots...
  12. thanks for the honest reply. I'll see myself out now.
  13. First time ever clicking this thread (big mistake, I know) but in the last page or 2 I've seen this mentioned multiple times. This 14 number I assume is citizens that have died/been killed by police in custody or in the process of custody that weren't armed compared to the amount of officers that have been killed (I'm assuming while on duty or in the process of making an arrest or whatever)? Quick question and sorry if its been asked and answered before or just ignore me completely: Does that 14 number (or the way they came about it) differentiate between whether the police knew, at the time, that the perp was armed or only found out after investigating? For example, say I have a gun in my glove compartment but I never bring it up or even mention it because of something or another and shit goes sideways with my police encounter and I'm killed (either rightly so or the cop fucked up), am I included in the number of armed people killed by the police even though my weapon was never a factor in my encounter with the police? Or if it was in my trunk and they only found it after doing an inventory search of my car after it was impounded by them?
  14. interesting little thing I picked up on after looking at some information from the last video about him speaking to a foreign leader in Europe: California has approximately 33 million acres of forest while the US as a whole is roughly 818 million acres (3.3 million square kilometers). The only European nation that has a comparable amount of forest area to us is...Russia with 8.1 million square kilometers of forest area. (I know technically all of Russia isn't in the European continent but it accounts to about 40% of the total area of Europe but I also don't put it past trump to not know any of that and just assume they're in Europe) Second in Europe is Sweden with almost 281,000 square kilometers. It would be weird if Sweden (or any country below them in rank) would call themselves a "forest nation" when they don't even have a 10th of the forest area we have in the states. I guess what I'm saying is that based on what he's said there it is not crazy to assume he was speaking with Putin or someone else in Russia...
  15. oh for fucks sake with these people
  16. saw that video earlier today as well and oh boy... also noticed that the date stamp above that Florida politician was May 2011. kinda cracks me up we're still arguing the same shit
  17. Hopefully getting closer @Biff Tannen
  18. It seems as though a small group of dudes (maybe 6?) were the ones talking shit. Weird thing to be protesting about but also lazy media (random people with blue check on twitter) automatically labeling these fools "BLM protestors" and just fanning flames. Of course idiot in chief will probably begin retweeting those claims as well as something like "Look at Joe Biden's America".
  19. the bolded is literally a link to mcenany's statement. There is no mention of the actual witnesses just that 8 have "debunked the story". She supposedly brings up 2 new "witnesses". The first, Derek Lyons a staff secretary, straight up says I was with the president the day after. The second new witness, Dan Walsh, confirms the bad weather call and the helicopters weren't able to fly but thats about it. Other than that they just gave personal opinions (lol) as to why they don't believe he'd say such a thing. I've seen Huckabeef come out and deny it but if you want to call her credible when she has straight up lied or told half-truths during her press conferences while press sec, that is a strange one to take at face value. I do know Bolton only said he didn't hear it but could see him saying it (this one probably hurts more than it helps). Trump even slipped up (lol again) and said he even called Melania that morning back at the White House when she was there with him. This is not a personal attack as I don't typically do those here (swam is gone so we good now) but man this is reaching. I agree with you on the fact that news reporting (even the Atlantic) has their fuck ups (probably too many than should be happening) and its beyond shitty when the correction doesn't get nearly as much traction as the original. Also in complete agreement that there is shitty journalism on both sides and journalists should in fact be arbiters of the truth. Keep the opinion pieces in the opinion section. On the Trump story being debunked, I cannot agree with you on that.
  20. This is what I got from reading the article as well. Bern makes a good point that a deeper look into lower brackets below the 200K threshold. I know my father works for AT&T and when all this shit came out he guessed (correctly) that instead of giving employees a raise they'd probably get a bonus and the rest would go back to shareholders, executives, etc. They ended up giving employees a one-time $1,000 bonus. AT&T (as well as others) instead moved that money back to shareholders in one way or another. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/at-t-got-a-giant-tax-cut-but-has-laid-off-thousands-union-says/ Edit to add that my pops would probably fall in that "deeper look" into the tax brackets as he makes (usually) between 90-105K a year depending on overtime work so I'd be interested to know how, if at all, his taxes have either increased or decreased.
  21. are you saying that because they're white?
  22. I don't get it tho because when you cross from Mexico to the US on foot or by car, you pay on the Mexican side as you're leaving the country. The US charges you when you leave into Mexico. Is he saying we are going to be charged again after paying in Mexico and crossing the bridge to the US side?
  23. Vladeck is a great for you legal nerds
×
×
  • Create New...