OK, sure.
(Caveat: I have no clue why the evidence below was relevant, because I was not inovolved in the litigation, just present in the courtroom at the time)
This involves a Pro se litigant in a trial in which she is fighting to retain certain rights to parent her biological child. The opposing attorney had a witness on the stand to, among other things, lay the predicate for and describe the contents of a photograph. The appropriate testimony is given to admit the photograph, and, over a non-sensical non-legal objection, it is entered. Fine. Then counsel asks the witness to describe the contents of the photograph. She begins:
Witness: "It depicts the Respondent fisting another woman"
Respondent: "Objection your honor, [turning to witness] how can you say I was fisting her when my fingers were only halfway in?"
Judge: "M'am. I have asked you time after time to address the Court and not the witness when you make an objection. Now, do you have a legal objection?
Respondent: "She can't just sit there and lie like that! It's not fisting if your whole fist doesn't go in the vagina!"
Judge: "OK. There having been no legal objection made, your objection is overruled."