Jump to content

Mdhorn

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    8595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mdhorn

  1. 9 trillion in debt from 4 years in office--that doesn't include infrastructure, healthcare or anything really meaningful. Where's the money? A wall that doesn't cover much and was built with the idea of pocketing the money, so it was built extra shoddy, is some of it, and Covid was huge, but he totally fucked that up. He was able to get 2-3 billion from the Saudis and another 10 million from Egypt into his pocket. This is what we know. So of course he's siphoning the GOP campaign contributions. That's what he does.
  2. Shit, I could have been a paramecium, bot fly or gizzard shad--far more of them and probably higher chance, than an Anglo American male. I won the damn lottery.
  3. Here's a question that should maybe asked--how can you call Democrats communists while supporting actual communists?
  4. So about this supposed debate with Kamala, will they be debating for an hour? There's no way the worms in his brain can muster up enough sentences past 15-20 minutes max.
  5. Thank you for your service. You're wrong, thoroughly debunked, but thanks anyways.
  6. Turnip is losing his talking points. Two of his 2020 rigged election analysis points were that one, Biden didn't have as big of crowds as he did and everybody saw, and two, all the polls had him up. Turnip losing to a black woman is the cherry on top.
  7. Does everybody remember The Turnip and Mr. Couch show? It had a limited release due to the main character committing fraud and rape.
  8. He'd either pocket the money from the opening ceremony or have it celebrate him, the greatest golfer in the world.
  9. First they're against different colors, but now we're to believe that the GOP would allow sprinkles? Two things--first, sprinkles are multi-colored, second--those sprinkles could be grooming their kids to become gay or color tolerant. You'll get white sprinkles or nothing.
  10. And that's Walz's message--stay out of our business.
  11. I want him to name names. Regardless of consequences, the light needs to shine on these cockroaches. I want them to defend their decisions against democracy publicly.
  12. My hope is that when he comes unhinged, he starts naming judges that personally owe him first, and second, that he calls out Congress critters similarly.
  13. You want to hear about Trump's golfing days in 'Nam?
  14. And steadily deteriorating. He may be eve worse in a month. If Kamala and Walz continue drawing large crowds, media attention and funding, Drumpf is going to be bananas.
  15. it's almost like the press are owned by a bunch of billionaires.
  16. I really hope not--because it legitimizes them as a news channel. And they're not, to the tune of a billion dollars for spreading misinformation. I don't think I want them recouping a dime of advertising money based on her appearance on their shitty network.
  17. Probably could go in the 2024 election shenanigans thread too, but it's on the record now--title is link: Arizona Republican becomes first fake elector to plead guilty for role in Trump scheme Lorraine Pellegrino, one of 11 Arizona Republicans who falsely posed as Trump’s electors that year, accepted a guilty plea to a single charge for filing a “false instrument” — the fraudulent Electoral College certificate. The state charge was one of several she faced for allegedly joining in a conspiracy to corrupt Arizona’s election results. Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes charged the 11 fake electors, as well as several top Trump allies, in a broad indictment in April. Trump himself was not charged in the Arizona case, but he was identified by a state grand jury as an unindicted coconspirator. Trump was also charged federally and in Georgia with felonies arising from his fake elector scheme and other efforts to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory. Pellegrino’s plea deal is the second victory in the Arizona case in as many days for Mayes, a Democrat. Another one of the 18 defendants, former Trump campaign attorney Jenna Ellis, began cooperating with prosecutors this week in exchange for a deal to dismiss the charges she faced. Ellis similarly cooperated with prosecutors last year in the Georgia case.... After his defeat at the polls in 2020, Trump’s lawyers hatched a plan to convene their own sets of presidential electors in some states where Biden was the certified victor. Initially, the attorneys said the so-called contingent electors were meant as placeholders in case Trump prevailed in any of his lawsuits to overturn the election results. Trump allies, like Ellis and Rudy Giuliani, also began leaning on Republican state legislatures to certify the Trump electors in order to stoke further proceedings and legal battles. As those efforts faltered, Trump eventually eyed an even more desperate plan: Use the existence of the false slates of electors to foment a controversy on Jan. 6, 2021, the day Congress and then-Vice President Mike Pence were charged with certifying the election results. Pence refused to accede to the plan, drawing Trump’s fury and ultimately the wrath of a pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol and derailed the electoral vote count for hours that day, threatening the transfer of power. My question is this--if this former plan already exists and there are cases still being held resulting from this broken plan to defraud American voters and Democracy, how could Trump try and pull it off again? Wouldn't it be pretty obvious to the point that everybody is looking at Trump wondering when he was going to start the proceedings to defraud the next election? And my second thought is--I'm glad that someone like Walz is the VP because he's ex military and maybe can deal with this crisis from the military side of things. Lastly, can't the judges and all the phony actors be called out in advance as in, we know what's actively in play, so we're going to need to verify everything with an independent lens or more eyes than just your political installations? Also, we need to see the lists of people purged from voter rolls to see if the purge is by party? I mean if a polling place requires a member from both parties to oversee voting, shouldn't this also be required from purging rolls and other election activities?
  18. Good, if they don't show up for his rallies, maybe they won't show up to the polls. I'm hoping Trump's lack of campaigning really cuts into their enthusiasm to vote. Reminds me of a saying--you keep knocking on the devil's door long enough, and sooner or later someone's going to answer you. A lunatic answered the door and Trump's orange ass got shot at. Let's see how bright he is and if he keeps knocking.
  19. Covfefe? Even my spellcheck tries to correct it. I have to go out of my way to fuck it up. See, Kamala is automatically corrected. He deliberately fucked it up.
  20. Shhh, he's showing his competency. Doesn't sound presidential does it?
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...