Just rented it, and can see why this was an excellent pairing with Barbie…watching it after Oppenheimer would be like a sweet, simple dessert after finishing your shag roll at Uchi.
In the same vein, Oppenheimer paired well with my on/off fascination with nuclear weapons. I’ve long been enamored with the assembly, operation and controls surrounding them but cared little for the personalities behind one of the greatest wartime engineering undertakings ever.
Stuff like Always/Never (Sandia labs video), Swords of Armageddon and Dark Sun fascinate me. Therefore I’m more fluent on exploding bridge wire vs slapper detonators than I am on Oppenheimer’s role in the Manhattan project…or know more about the Teller-Ulam design than what Edward Teller was like as a person.
“Oppenheimer” helped fill a void for me.
Regarding the movie itself, I really enjoyed it and it left me with one of those ‘existential dread’ feelings that a smart, dialog-driven drama should. It also captured, very well, that transitional period where things went from an urgent wartime science problem into one dominated by the massive government/military personalities over their use. The fact that I missed so many cameos is testament that the story and personalities were the real star. Bravo.
Was definitely a Nolan film with non-linear flow, challenging plot points and lack of cgi. I happen to enjoy that kind of film, but I can see why it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. I agree with others in that this mostly wasn’t a “gotta see it in IMAX” due to fewer “holy shit” visual/score combos than something like Interstellar.
Anyways, guess the point of my long cat post here is I’m glad I finally saw it and it’ll fuel my curiosity surrounding the people involved in that whole rodeo…but Interstellar is safely still #1 in my Nolan hierarchy.