Jump to content

chainsaw

Full Members
  • Posts

    10766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by chainsaw

  1. No seriously, I am not sure what counts as a "projection" to you. My opinion is based on the fact that Texas Tech doesn't have the Jimmies or the Joes to compete with elite programs. A team with a good record from a weak conference does not fool Vegas. Why do you think Penn State was heavily favored against Boise last year, even though Boise had a guy with stats comparable to Barry Sanders? I don't have a problem with Tech getting an automatic bid and being the representative from the Big XII. I even think they have a puncher's chance of upsetting a team like Texas A&M if they were to meet. But Vegas would still have aggy favored. SEC teams just have more depth and have been tested more than Tech has. If you think we're just being biased, by all means, test that theory by going somewhere else and asking what they think Vegas would be likely to do and why.
  2. Tell you what, go to secrant or any other board and ask them what they'd set the line at and why. Report back.
  3. What does this even mean?
  4. I didn't say we would beat or be favored against every team, though. We know Ohio State and Georgia would be favored. I don't need to debate about Indiana, Oregon, Ole Miss, or Bama, because it doesn't matter. Even if we assume those six teams should be ranked ahead of Texas, that still makes Texas a top ten team. The rest are "the obvious" (to borrow your words), but just to be thorough, we beat Vandy, ousux, and aggy, and we have a better record than ND against common opponents. Tech has no common opponents because of its incredibly weak schedule. You cannot say with a straight face that Vegas would project Tech to beat Texas. That's just reality. The same can be said for BYU. Miami is the closest call because it has a better record and beat the only common opponent (Florida) albeit not at the swamp. If we grant that Miami should be ahead, just to be conservative, that means seven teams clearly should be ranked ahead of Texas: Ohio State, Georgia, Indiana, Oregon, Ole Miss, Alabama, Miami. The remaining teams (Vandy, ousux, aggy, ND, Tech, BYU) might have better records, but they would not be favored against Texas because Texas is a better team with better athletes, and Texas has already beaten half of them.
  5. For what? I already told you, among the 13 teams ranked ahead of Texas by the AP, Texas is better than at least four: three teams it already beat (Vandy, ousux, aggy) and the teams you already agreed it would be favored against (Miami, Notre Dame, BYU). If you think Tech would be favored, you'd be in the minority.
  6. Texas Tech has not played anyone good, and despite that, they aren't undefeated. They would not be favored against any SEC playoff team, and would not be favored against Texas. In fact, I would even say that Tech would struggle against Tennessee and Florida.
  7. They have no chance of winning without Kiffin or any of his staff.
  8. That only lessens the impact of "punishing" teams who lose their conference championship games. Sark is right that if Texas had gone to Louisville instead of Columbus there would be no debate. So would you rather "punish" teams who sign up for tough OOC competition but fail to win, or do you want to "punish" teams who make the conference championship but fail to win? Remember that if SMU had beaten Clemson, SMU probably wouldn't need to go on the road (in other words, they were "punished" with a lower seed for losing to Clemson)
  9. Well, for starters, Texas has already beaten three of the 13. Who's left? Indiana, let's call that one a wash. (Personally I think we smoke them) Oregon, let's call that a wash, too. (Same) Texas Tech, I have no doubt we would crush them, and Vegas would agree. Lubbock, Jerryworld, it don't make a shit. Texas by 20+ (Wh)ole Mess, call it a wash. Notre Dame, we have a stronger record against common opponents (2-0 vs. 1-1) Alabama, Georgia, and Ohio State, I'll concede they'd be favored. BYU? We would be favored by two scores. Miami? We would be favored as well. Do you think anything I just said is outlandish?
  10. Why not? It happened all the time in the BCS days.
  11. It's just true. Can you name ten teams ranked ahead of Texas that would beat Texas?
  12. and if Georgia wins in Atlanta? Then what?
  13. Would Texas have lost to Florida if they'd benched Stroh and moved Hutson to Guard? If Malik Muhamad was available to prevent Dallas Wilson from racking up 100+ yard receiving and 2 TDs? I doubt it. if we're going to nitpick the win against OU because of Mateer's health we also should be willing to nitpick the loss at Florida. But you don't need to do any of that because deep down everyone knows that no matter what the records say, as of November 30, the Texas Longhorns are a better team than, and would beat (and in the case of three of them, have already beaten) most of the 13 teams the Coaches and AP have ranked ahead of them
  14. But it's totally cool to lose to Florida State
  15. Common opponents: Georgia, Vandy, Oklahoma Alabama Record: 2-2 Texas Record: 2-1 By the SEC's own tiebreak procedure, Texas would be ahead of Alabama.
  16. We did not. We let our foot of the gas, but we did not "struggle."
  17. The Kiffin sage has bored me to death. What a drama queen. Makes Mack Brown look stoic in comparison.
  18. AP and Coaches either overreacted to the Georgia loss or correctly reacted to the Georgia loss, and those same voters clearly underreacted to the Texas A&M win. That's obvious bias, and they know damn well that they're being hypocritical.
  19. It's a factory for annoying mormon QBs who have breakout games against Texas. If we need Tech to beat them, there's a good chance the mormon football gods will order up a soak session for a big xii title
  20. It just means more when you're at home and barely beat a terrible LSU team
  21. I'm never thrilled to see the UTEPs and SHSUs but I always figured it was some kind of charity deal to them
  22. You're not ready to see another white dude gain 250 rushing and 250 passing?
  23. The other part of this discussion is the difference between judging who the twelve best teams are and judging what the twelve best records are. If all we're doing is judging records, Texas is a bubble team, on the outside looking in. But anyone who actually watches these games would know that especially once we benched Connor Stroh and moved Cole Hutson to Guard the Longhorns are a much better team than the team who lost in Columbus and Gainesville. Vandy has lost to the post-switchup Longhorns, and Oklahoma lost to a version of the Longhorns that is even worse than the current version. So has aggy. The loss to Florida has to be accounted for, of course, but the correct way to account for that loss is not by pretending Longhorns in November are a worse team than they actually are by pretending that teams like Oklahoma, Vanderbilt, Utah, and BYU are better. Or even if we're being honest, Notre Dame, who is 1-1 against common opponents that Texas is 2-0 against. March Madness sucks. We hate 16 seeds
  24. no cartoon?
×
×
  • Create New...