Jump to content

Guadaloopy

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    11100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Guadaloopy

  1. Which I have already conceded is a huge fuck-up. The dummy smash at the end is just meat for the mob.
  2. Minus the school bus, no human driver was spotting or anticipating that “kid” in that scenario.
  3. That’s not what I said. Has nothing to do with the rate at which the “child” enters the roadway. It’s that the “child” is completely hidden from view by a parked vehicle until less than a second before impact. It’s an impossible scenario.
  4. Huge fuck-up not stopping for the school bus with its lights flashing and the sign out. I’m not quite as concerned with the extra dummy test thrown in for dramatic purposes. There isn’t a driving system on the planet that will stop in time to avoid the pedestrian with the timing they show in this test. The completely hidden dummy moves in front of the car less than a second before impact. Minus the school bus as a cue in this scenario, a human driver would hit that kid every time. You can see the car react and begin to stop - there just wasn’t enough time in this scenario.
  5. Zero. This is a great sportswashing opportunity for a corrupt regime. Playing nice when all eyes are on you provides great international cover for bad actors. Hell... the actual Nazis played somewhat nice in '36.
  6. Awesome. Someone to root for in the CWS.
  7. 100% this. I did a rewatch of the first immediately before watching this one on Saturday and the difference is jarring. The way he depicted someone with ASD in the first was nuanced and believable. He went full-on caricature in the second movie. The Justine twist at the end of the first one was great, but the army of kids on computers in this one felt like pandering.
  8. FUCK!!! This song has lived quietly in my sub-conscious for five decades, and now it's back with a vengeance.
  9. I know TV isn't real, but deep down a part of me was looking for liver damage on the list.
  10. I'm a bit disappointed that it took until posts #24 and #28 for these two replies.
  11. Guadaloopy

    LBGTQ

    This false belief comes from a complete misunderstanding of scripture. In Matthew 21:18-19, we see what Jesus really meant: The real message of scripture is that "God hates figs."
  12. That was more obstruction than Goode got called for.
  13. Hell… I ain’t never even heard of anything like that.
  14. There are what... 2-3 Pesky pole shots per year? We 2-3 Yankee specials a month, if not more.
  15. The guy's story may be true, but it doesn't help his credibility when he uses a photo from another accident: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12910273/cybertruck-accident-california-tesla-ev-toyota-demolished.html?ico=most_shared_articles_mol.web.desktop
  16. Nostalgia is doing a lot of heavy lifting on that A tier. Pretty embarrassing to have the newest stadium in MLB on the D tier.
  17. It is number one with a huge lead. From the 2016 season through May of 2024 when this article was written, Yankee Stadium had 143 "stadium specials" - HRs that are only HRs in 1 of 30 ballparks. Wrigley was second with 98, and Daikin is third with 75. Around 28% of stadium specials in all of MLB since 2016 have been hit to right field in Yankee Stadium. Own it, @Helobious
  18. What Derka said. It's not that the entire park is a bandbox. The issue is the moronic RF construction. 314 down the line and just an 8 ft high wall. Crawford boxes (which many complain about) are 315 and 19ft, respectively. Crawford boxes are CF at the Polo Grounds compared to Yankee Stadium RF.
  19. The driver monitoring detection primarily uses the interior camera to monitor the driver's eyes. If the driver's eyes are visible to the camera and forward, you will see the "Hands-on not required" state. If the driver's eyes are obscured by a cap or if the interior camera is covered, then the system uses the torque detection on the steering wheel to determine if the driver's hands are on the wheel. That's why this incident shows "Detected." For some reason in this case, the camera monitoring of driver's eyes was not available, therefore the driver needed to keep their hands on the wheel. The data shows that the driver's hands (or a "defeat device") were on the wheel. re: A defeat device... Tesla has updated their driver detection algorithm multiple times to detect "defeat devices." If a device places continuous, steady torque on the steering wheel, the software will detect that it is not a human hand and will disable autopilot/FSD. That said, people are still jury-rigging ways to avoid keeping their hands on the wheel like the moron below, which could absolutely contribute to an accident. Yes, it will slow down using re-gen braking. In the data for this incident, you do see a slight deceleration begin once FSD is disabled, but it is very gradual. Tesla states that the driver must immediately take over once FSD is disengaged, but based on my experience, re-gen deceleration is not as "immediate" after FSD disengagement. I think there is a more gradual application of re-gen after FSD disengagement to avoid abrupt deceleration in the event of an inadvertent disengagement, but that is my theory based on experience.
  20. I love that this episode saved a dude from a false murder rap: https://www.netflix.com/title/80182115.
×
×
  • Create New...