Jump to content

bschoolprof

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    6079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bschoolprof

  1. You are out of your element Donny. Deloitte did not audit internal controls for the city, like vendor payments. Public companies have to get internal control audits, not just financial statement audits.
  2. A for-profit entity, comparable in size and scope (~14,000 employees, $6 billion in spending per year)? Absolutely. They would have public debt/equity and their internal controls, not just their financials, would be audited by a big 4 firm.
  3. Not killing humans but instead infecting them with a virus that forces them to kill themselves slowly is some pretty silly moral gymnastics. I'd like it more if it ends up being a tongue and cheek satire of our own behavior atop the food chain ("These chicken got to lead a great, free-range life until we murdered them.") Something akin to our destruction as a species ending up as an asterik on a carton in an alien grocery store or warehouse, saying something like: "these inter-planetary resources were harvested ethically and responsibly."
  4. Next stop light pull up will be a little awkward. Sup bro?
  5. If they just want an empty earth with no humans, infecting everyone with a virus that, I don't know . . . just kills them, seems much more efficient.
  6. theories on the others' endgame in all this?
  7. Sark, you beautiful drunk bastard. We love you again. Until we have another bad game and lose.
  8. I had no idea those beer cans were gonna blow like that.
  9. The probability that at least one person wins a bonus prize is about 40%. Each person in line in the 1st 100 has a 10% chance of winning a big prize and a 90% chance of not winning the big prize. The probability of at least one person in the group winning the big prize is the inverse of nobody winning a big prize. Thus, the probability is 1-(.90)^5, which is about 40%.
  10. Some fed no doubt entrapped these dipshits. what a waste of time.
  11. what do you think are they talking about?
  12. The Peter Principle in action. Most head coaches perfectly exemplify the peter principle. And no I'm not talking about Sark banging AD employees or coeds.
  13. I'm the mythical fan that he always tries to convince of the error of his ways ("I tried to tell you our RB room was shit, but you wouldn't listen"), but I don't listen because I'm a dumb person.
  14. Our pass defense with PK has always been suspect, IMO. It's his weakness. I wish oh wish that was my biggest concern with the program.
  15. Getting this thread back on track a bit, there aren't enough Jerry's out there for an NFL team to really want this guy as an OC. They tried that once and he made the offense much worse and was fired. Throughout his career, he's had mediocre offenses, including his time here. He is not some offensive savant. He comes up with some cool plays. That's not an offense. He's a pretty shitty OC at this point. So if there's no real NFL escape hatch, he's staying here for a while.
  16. Yeah, no shit. Scipio needs to tell us where on the doll the strawman he keeps arguing with touched him. He's insufferable about this, his writing talent notwithstanding.
  17. Sark needs to be told this is the offseason for the Hail Mary staff reboot. No staff reshuffling two years from now. He won’t, but he should be. And it won’t make a shit either way. The same dipshit that hired these fools, and let them fall asleep on the job, will be in charge of hiring their replacements. Lovely.
  18. Sark seems like a good guy. He's great with media. He comes up with some cool plays, but not really an offense. I hoped things would work out for him here, but figured they wouldn't. Oh well, on to the next dude in a year or two. We go 1-1 to finish out the season and play in some shit bowl no ones cares about.
  19. Then you haven't been watching carefully enough. He's always been like that, along with 99% of meathead jock coach types. It's a mix of narcissism and strong self-confidence, which you must have in sports. But the ability for critical self-reflection and a "hey, maybe I'm the one that needs to change" attitude is not something you're going to find in a coach. Better to cut bait and try find the dude that's already got it figured out.
  20. Perhaps it's just because my team is shitty, but the playoffs don't excite me at all this year. Lots of mediocre football teams.
  21. I would like to give Sydney Sweeney a try. Similar odds.
  22. It’s obvious Sark’s not the guy, but he’s not going anywhere this year. Only question is whether he tries (or is forced to try ) the old staff reboot Hail Mary bullshit. We’ve seen that movie before.
  23. I barely remember the 1st one.
×
×
  • Create New...