Jump to content

bschoolprof

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    5603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bschoolprof

  1. In the playoffs , I agree. But early in the season we just wanna see what we got. So I get it.
  2. The camera work here is just one step above dad running gamechanger with his go pro.
  3. Martinez not seeing the ball well today. She’s like 0 for 8. Her approach is a mess.
  4. Mike loves the aggressive send.
  5. That ball didn’t hit her.
  6. Kavan with 4 Ks so far. Yes. She’s week to week. She did not look good in the inter squad imo.
  7. That ball was nuked. Terrible two strike pitch.
  8. There’s our normal fielding bullshit. Kavan locating well imo.
  9. Yeah, I see my misunderstanding now. I assumed they excluded you if you were seropositive. But it looks like they only excluded you if you had a confirmed covid infection (I'm assuming a positive PCR test). The numbers from the FDA don't tie out to the published study, which confused me, but I see now in the NEJM study they do list the results by serology status (i.e., antibody positive or negative). There is a significant effect for antibody positive patients, but it is small, which is probably why the EPIC-SR was a no results study. There are two other RCTs I know of on Paxlovid that are null results beyond EPIC-SR.
  10. EPIC-HR enrolled "high risk" (hence HR) patients from July - December 2021. If you had a previous covid infection or a vaccine, you were excluded**. The drug worked and the study was published in the NEJM. I'm not sure this result generalizes to 2024. A second trial, EPIC-SR (standard risk) enrolled people who had a vaccine. In preliminary results dribbled out by Pfizer, it was a no results study - there was no significant effect. The full study has not been published anywhere that I can tell. **The numbers regarding antibody positive quoted in the FDA release, which came from Pfizer, appear nowhere in the NEJM article, nor the online appendix (that I can tell). I'm not even sure how they would be collected since the trial specifically excluded folks with prior infection or vaccine uptake.
  11. Player AB Highlights Dayton 3-5 3 RBI Atwood 3-3 3 RBI Mitchell 2-2 2B, Hunter 1-1 2B, 2 RBI Stewart 1-2 2B, 2 RBI Quiroga 1-1 2B, 2 RBI A.Washington 1-2 HR, 1 RBI Cimusz 1-2 1 RBI I think san diego might be bad at softball.
  12. 19 runs on 15 hits. Mac with a no-no headed into the last inning.
  13. jesus fuck what a massacre
  14. Jordy Bahl left the opener yesterday with a knee/ankle injury.
  15. Cimusz and Bella with RBIs. Now 4-0, top 2nd.
  16. Goode looked like she was favoring her wrist a bit in the open practice. . . she had some surgery in the offseason. Also, I like how Stewart opens up catching and in the 4 hole. No easing in . . .
  17. Just goes to show you certainly don't have to be smart to be a successful real estate developer or oil catter/football team owner.
  18. https://pac-12.com/article/2024/02/08/saturday-softball-games-move-easton-stadium Saturday's games moved to UCLA due to field conditions. No streaming available. We avoided early Austin games due to bad Feb weather in years past but mother nature said not so fast my friend.
  19. 1990: Goodfellas 1991: Silence of the lambs 1992: Tie: A few good men/Unforgiven 1993: Schindler's list 1994: Tie: Shawshank / Pulp Fiction 1995: Braveheart 1996: Fargo 1997: LA Confidential 1998: Saving Private Ryan 1999: 6th sense 2000: Traffic I didn't follow directions because movies today are total fucking shit.
  20. so I'm guessing starters are Gutierrez and then Mac against ucla in the circle tomorrow. It's nice to have 5 pitchers now.
  21. "agent! . . agent!!! agent!!! . . agent, you fucking piece of shit!!"
  22. Yeah, self checkout is far superior to the old way. I'd get stuck behind some shitbird paying for toothpaste and diapers with a pile of coupons and a letter of credit from the bank of luxembourg.
  23. Sounds fine. This is fine.
×
×
  • Create New...