Jump to content

BluTechsan

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

421 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I don’t think this is getting enough love The matchups can all be debated. But the concept of “why do all the top seeds have to play an extra game?” asks a question that makes a ton of sense
  2. Their resume is CURRENTLY better than ND. ESPN willingly left that info off their chart last night tOSU/Indy - both teams in win or lose UGA/Bama - both teams in win or lose Tech - in win or lose BYU - we like ND better so play an extra game to improve your already superior resume to prove your worth to us
  3. Right. That’s exactly right. Blatantly corrupt but accurate. Nevermind that their resume is better than 2 of the 3 teams featured on said graph
  4. I think we all know why ESPN left BYU off their graph last night
  5. I wouldn’t like that one team would be playing in a CCG and two wouldn’t but a debate between BYU, Miami, and Texas for the final spot would be more honest than just giving it to ND
  6. I don’t share this as comparison to the BIGSEC - I share because BYU should ALREADY be ranked ahead of ND !!!! But as it stands, the only drama on CCG Saturday is the Big12 game because of BYU’s #11 rank College football is a TeeVee show and nothing more!!
  7. Guess they didn’t have room to squeeze #11 onto the graphic
  8. Here you go Texas, your reason to keep scheduling good OOC Yes, BYU has a chance to play their way in but why should they have to? Why aren’t they already on the 10 line and ND on the cut line? The difference between ND(10-2) and BYU(11-1) that has the Catholics ahead of the Mormons seems to be - ND’s LOSSES!! Keep in mind, neither of these schedules is an SEC schedule so that argument isn’t a factor 10-2 @ MIAMI (L) - #12 A&M (L) - #7 Purdue @ Arkansas Boise NCSU USC - #16 @ BC Navy @Pitt Cuse @ Stanford 11-1 Portland St Stanford @ E Carolina @ Colorado WVU @ Arizona - #18 Utah - #15 @ Iowa St @ TxTech (L) - #4 TCU @Cincy UCF ….ok, I’m a realist, it’s the sticker on the helmet that
  9. Because people keep blaming that loss on Texas being on the outside looking in? It’s not for me. It’s for everyone that seems to have forgotten it. I know that Texas was still top10
  10. Again I ask, was Texas still ranked after playing Ohio St?
  11. Was Texas ranked after the Ohio St loss? Would THAT ranking have them safely in the field?
  12. Ok. Who else? Total teams from other leagues? What’s your format?
  13. That’s why I asked the question the way I did because the Ohio St game doesn’t affect your place in the SEC standings - but the Florida loss does. Georgia, Ole Miss, and Aggy all have fewer losses OU and Bama are the same as Texas No committee. No polls. Who does SEC send to the playoffs?
  14. I agree. THAT should be the talking point. Not the Ohio St loss.
  15. Riddle me this: If there were no committee and playoff participants were sent as representatives from their conferences, would the SEC send Texas? For this discussion, poll don’t matter - just the conference representatives - and you get to pick your format - 12 teams or 16 - byes or no byes - home games or neutral - I don’t care All I want to know is the number of reps from each conference and wether or not the SEC would send Texas. If the answer is yes, then make that your argument and forget about the Ohio St loss and all the whining about not playing those games anymore and instead focus on projecting your answer to this year’s playoffs and tell me which SEC team Texas should bump.
×
×
  • Create New...