Jump to content

BluTechsan

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BluTechsan

  1. 1st 10:00 they couldn't buy a basket, 2nd 10:00 they couldn't miss never seen momentum shift that hard and fast before
  2. I didn't want to quote the pic because I didn't want it on this page but that billboard is definitely aggy level lame.
  3. not sure what the hell the announcer is watching
  4. Cyclones can't ever seem to score on back-to-back possessions. Buckeyes are doing it just enough to maintain the lead.
  5. Apologies in advance for asking something that was probably discussed upthread somewhere, but what was the process used that made KSU the 1 seed and Tech the 2 seed? Was it Tech's home loss to ISU?
  6. All 3 OOC games is stupid. But I really don't see a downside to playing 1 PAC game each year conference wide.
  7. "All three" is what was stated and is exactly what I questioned. Playing for a tie is one thing, but the team with a shot at an outright title truly controls their destiny. edit: I think you are wrong about KU's "outright" chances - unless you don't understand what "control your own destiny" means
  8. If Tech wins out, someone else still has to beat the Cats for there to be a tie. If KU wins out, best they can hope for is a tie, unless someone else beats the Cats. If Cats win out, they are Champs.
  9. I'm not seeing how all 3 control their own destiny. Cats 9-3 @WV oSu @KU BU @TCU OU Tech 9-4 KU oSu @TCU UT @ISU Hawks 9-4 @Tech KSU @oSu @OU BU
  10. Cats are still in the driver's seat are they not? They can even survive another loss - no one else can.
  11. This x 1000
  12. What a horrific read. But one that should be required reading.
  13. Isn't there also a rule about an out of bounds player having to re-establish himself on the field of play before touching the ball?
  14. If I had confidence that the plastics and papers I save for the recycle bins were actually recycled, I'd participate more. But my confidence level is at 5% and therefore I do not.
  15. Any Wonder Woman, Willie Wonka, West World, or Wild West fan could name 27 Dannys, Erics, Jakeems, or Kekees in their sleep.
  16. That's the page I've been viewing. And when I get to the pic of the 4 Horsemen, there's a blue "button" that says "10 more". If I keep scrolling without clicking on that button I see pics from non related galleries but if I click - it loads 10 more football pics and so on and so on. So to view 500 pics I have to load 50 pages - and at some point it crashes and I have to start back at the beginning.
  17. Regarding the ACC, BIG, and SECSECSEC dropping back to 12 teams, 14 is just a hot mess scheduling wise. I would think the additional revenue of an expanded playoff would far outweigh any real or imangined revenue of those two additional markets that 13 and 14 bring to the table.
  18. Pics are awesome but I can't ever get through the whole set without the page reloading and having to start all over at pic 1. Is there a way to view them without having to constantly hit the "10 more" button?
  19. Dude still should have caught that 4th down pass tho.
  20. Yup. And the inverse is what I wonder about. Yes, Arkansas and LSU I'm looking at you. People always scoff at the idea of them becoming member numbers 11 and 12 but how would it not benefit all parties? If auto qualifiers are in play then this move makes a ton of sense to me. And in a perfect world, we'd punt Baylor to allow for Nebraska's return and the BIG could then drop Rutgers to get down to 12 teams. Lastly the B12 and SECSECSEC could then swap WV and Mizzu.
  21. So since '08 keeps coming up let's not just talk about who's in the top 8 and who isn't but let's also talk about deciding conf champs absent CCGs. Tech's blowout loss made it easy to eliminate them but it was still mucked up because OU went over Texas - or was it? If Tech got dinged for the loss, makes sense for OU to get credit for the 42 point victory, right? Yet everyone hated that outcome because Horns won head-to-head. If margin of victory doesn't matter, what should be the criteria for breaking ties? Which data point is most important? Let's fast forward... It's the fall of 2019 and CCGs are extinct. How shall we decide the conf champs?
  22. The Red Sox can never play the Yankees in the World Series even if they are the two best teams in MLB. The Bears can never play the Packers in the Super Bowl even if they are the two best teams in the NFL The Warriors and Lakers can never play in the NBA finals even if they are the two best teams. Is this a good thing or bad? Should the AFC vs NFC, the AL vs NL, and the East vs West be done away with? So to expand on the strong division vs weak division CCG argument I'd be in favor of taking it a step further - If this playoff expansion goes forward, I'd like to see provisions where multiple teams from the same conference are all on the same side of the bracket. No more Georgia vs Bama for the title. 😎
×
×
  • Create New...