A day of sitting on this and I want to rip on it even more, I guess because the original is an all-timer.
It was like going to watch karaoke. Shot for shot from something so famous, without the actors being visible, just means you have all the lines you know but sounding a little off. It was a display of technical achievement in making it photorealistic, but it turns out that is impressive but not necessarily what I go to the movie for.
If the first one had really missed something, then this would make sense as a second chance to get it right. But the first one is in the argument for the greatest cartoon movie ever. And the very few changes they decided to make seemed like they didn’t work. Of course the biggest thing is the Disneyfied expressions replaced with uncanny valley discussed above. They got rid of Ed, the dim witted but demented hyena, and replaced that comic element with some sort of annoying little brother dynamic that was supposed to be funny, which made them both less funny and less threateneing. They repeated jokes of the original, and where they didn’t often inspired groans like actually saying fart in Hakuna Matata. They were confined by the realism so they couldn’t have hyenas goose stepping in song.
I thought John Oliver did well (other than his part in I Just Can’t Wait to Be King, which was distractingly bad). I thought Chiwetel Ejiofor did well as Scar, which was one I was worried about going in because I didn’t think he’d be able to do the menace of Jeremy Irons. But my guess is those two were the best because of the specifics of the character they played. A hornbill sort of feels cartoonish to begin with, and the dry Englishman villain thing sort of works when expressionless because it reads as “all of this is proceeding as I have foreseen.”
Anyhow that’s me pushing back against something that will make megabajillions.