Jump to content

atomheartbevo

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    61904
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    163

atomheartbevo last won the day on November 27

atomheartbevo had the most liked content!

Reputation

102697 Surly 1%

About atomheartbevo

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Jaime Pescador
  2. Discussions are out there that Mark Kelly and the others in the ā€œseditiousā€ video were referencing this incident, which is why Trump and Hedgehog freaked out so much, because it’s either a war crime (if we were at war) or murder.
  3. They probably could as well.
  4. And Putin demands elections in Ukraine all the while nobody wants to talk about there not being any fair elections in Russia for decades, because Putin jails his election rivals, and even murders them. And after 2022’s main invasion, Ukraine can’t even have elections because it’s under martial law. When Russia leaves, they can lift martial law and go back to elections. Hell, even if they could hold elections, we know Russia would not pass up the juicy target that would be lines of Ukrainians waiting to vote.
  5. ā€œThe Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States.ā€ I could swear Joe Biden was President. Also, Trump lashing out like this means some other scandal (or details about a current scandal) is about to rear its ugly head. Poor Venezuela. He’s already announced a ground war of sorts, it’s just a matter of time where the scandal is too big.
  6. And a libertarian. A libertarian at a Thanksgiving dinner with a Crossfitter and Subaru owner would complete the trifecta, and probably result in three deaths.
  7. They watched Clear and Present Danger (they couldn’t be bothered to read the book) and took all the wrong lessons away from it. Hegseth probably beats off to it.
  8. We are absolutely going to war. https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/27/politics/trump-says-us-land-action-in-venezuela-very-soon President Donald Trump suggested Thursday that the United States is preparing to take new action against alleged drug trafficking networks in Venezuela, telling service members during a Thanksgiving call that efforts for strikes on land will be starting ā€œvery soon.ā€ ā€œIn recent weeks, you’ve been working to deter Venezuelan drug traffickers, of which there are many. Of course, there aren’t too many coming in by sea anymore,ā€ Trump told service members in the call. ā€œYou probably noticed that people aren’t wanting to be delivering by sea, and we’ll be starting to stop them by land also,ā€ the president continued. ā€œThe land is easier, but that’s going to start very soon. Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all The longer the U.S. surveillance aircraft followed the boat, the more confident intelligence analysts watching from command centers became that the 11 people on board were ferrying drugs. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation. ā€œThe order was to kill everybody,ā€ one of them said. A missile screamed off the Trinidad coast, striking the vessel and igniting a blaze from bow to stern. For minutes, commanders watched the boat burning on a live drone feed. As the smoke cleared, they got a jolt: Two survivors were clinging to the smoldering wreck. The Special Operations commander overseeing the Sept. 2 attack — the opening salvo in the Trump administration’s war on suspected drug traffickers in the Western Hemisphere — ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s instructions, two people familiar with the matter said. The two men were blown apart in the water. Hegseth’s order, which has not been previously reported, adds another dimension to the campaign against suspected drug traffickers. Some current and former U.S. officials and law-of-war experts have said that the Pentagon’s lethal campaign — which has killed more than 80 people to date — is unlawful and may expose those most directly involved to future prosecution. The alleged traffickers pose no imminent threat of attack against the United States and are not, as the Trump administration has tried to argue, in an ā€œarmed conflictā€ with the U.S., these officials and experts say. Because there is no legitimate war between the two sides, killing any of the men in the boats ā€œamounts to murder,ā€ said Todd Huntley, a former military lawyer who advised Special Operations forces for seven years at the height of the U.S. counterterrorism campaign. Even if the U.S. were at war with the traffickers, an order to kill all the boat’s occupants if they were no longer able to fight ā€œwould in essence be an order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime,ā€ said Huntley, now director of the national security law program at Georgetown Law.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...