Jump to content

atomheartbevo

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    60310
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    153

Everything posted by atomheartbevo

  1. She can’t marry Han if she’s dead.
  2. How about just printing out large posters of Melania Trump posing nude with that other woman and displaying them in court? It's pretty wild that they are going to try and criminalize all porn and adult content in one go, (down to things like Game of Thrones) - I figured we would have gotten a nation-wide version of the Texas age ID bill where people had to present their IDs in some form to view porn/get put on a government list first. But nope, going right for the sources.
  3. There's nothing slow about it, and this legislation will pass. It'll stop plenty of tech-ignorant people, but I'm assuming the VPNs will be blasting ads all over the place (more than they do now). Right now the legislation is just aimed at producers of porn, and their hosting companies.
  4. Nope, apparently, it's a pretty common thing to happen, according to the internet.
  5. In a move that surprises nobody, the Incel King of Free Speech cannot be criticized by Tesla employees After Tesla Employees Signed Letter Asking Elon Musk to Resign, at Least One Has Been Fired Tesla Employees Against Elon
  6. And by the way, the definition of what they consider to be obscene covers a shitload of your typical R-rated movies and TV shows.
  7. We knew they were going to make a run at all porn - it's what all of this was leading up to, to see how much people would tolerate in terms of barriers put in place against porn. I remember people saying that Texas wouldn't try and block porn, and well, they did with the age verification bullshit (really just a way to get a list of everybody trying to access porn). Stock up on your porn, I expect this to move through pretty fast. This was a centerpiece for a lot of the Project 2025 people. Lee Bill Establishes Obscenity Definition Across States - Mike Lee US Senator fo... U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act today to clarify the legal definition of “obscenity” for all states, making the transmission of obscene content across state lines more easily prosecuted. U.S. Representative Mary Miller (R-IL) is the bill’s co-lead in the House of Representatives. “Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” said Senator Mike Lee. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.” “The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act equips law enforcement with the tools they need to target and remove obscene material from the internet, which is alarmingly destructive and far outside the bounds of protected free speech under the Constitution. I’m proud to lead this effort in the House with Senator Lee to safeguard American families and ensure this dangerous material is kept out of our homes and off our screens.” – Representative Mary Miller The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA) clarifies the definition of obscenity across all states and provides updated descriptions suited to modern content. The new definition removes dependence on ever-changing and elusive public opinion, replacing ambiguity with practical standards to make obscenity identifiable. This change will prevent obscene material such as pornography from evading prosecution by relying on the legal confusion of differing standards between states. Under IODA, law enforcement will be empowered to identify and prevent obscenity from being transmitted across state lines. Obscenity is already unprotected speech under the First Amendment, but its current definition makes it difficult to assess and prosecute. The current legal definition of obscenity was taken from a Supreme Court case argued in 1973. Its standards are subjective and vague, making it difficult to apply with certainty to any given material. Using a pre-internet standard for modern times presents serious challenges – particularly when states use differing definitions for “obscenity” – and allows criminals to evade prosecution. The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA): Defines “obscenity” within the Communications Act of 1934 as content that: taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion, depicts, describes or represents actual or simulated sexual acts with the objective intent to arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual desires of a person, and, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Strengthens the existing general prohibition on obscenity in the Communications Act (47 U.S.C 223(a)) by removing the “intent” requirement that only prohibits the transmission of obscenity for the purposes abusing, threatening, or harassing a person. EXCLUSIVE: New GOP Bill Seeks To Take Sledgehammer To Online Porn Industry | The Daily Caller Congressional Republicans will introduce legislation Thursday that would severely crack down on internet pornography and potentially deal a major blow to the online porn industry. Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee and Republican Illinois Rep. Mary Miller’s Interstate Obscenity Definition Act would create a national definition of obscenity under the Communications Act of 1934 and amend the Supreme Court’s 1973 “Miller Test” for determining what qualifies as obscene, according to background on the bill exclusively obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The bill would pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn
  8. So the Chinese kids I’m paying $0.50 an hour, 18 hours a day, to farm stuff in World of Warcraft - surely I don’t have to pay tariffs on that shit since Trump is currently not aware of Azeroth?
  9. What about those of us with middle-schoolers, who will proceed to try and dismantle everything and rebuild it the way they want it?
  10. It totally tracks though, that we claim to have brokered a ceasefire that only lasts a few hours.
  11. Why is your kid poking around my mom's house?
  12. Pretty good look at the whole Ghorman thing.
  13. The ceasefire lasted a few hours before they mixed it up again. India and Pakistan ceasefire shaken by overnight clashes in Kashmir, on the heels of U.S.-led deal - CBS News Meanwhile, here's one of the few decent Kashmir covers out there, namely because they used an orchestra to back themselves (not every band has John Paul Jones).
  14. Why does your wife hate free shoes? Is it because they are used, or because she can't find her size amongst your neighbors?
  15. He controls the board, which is the problem. Also, completely on brand for the next model to be "Q" because
  16. At least they no longer pretend the US isn’t an oligarchy.
  17. Reuters Pakistan's defence minister said on Saturday that no meeting of the top military and civil body overseeing the country's nuclear arsenal had been scheduled following a military operation against India earlier in the day. Pakistan's military said earlier that the prime minister had called on the authority to meet. The information minister did not respond immediately to a request for comment. The worst fighting between the nuclear-armed rivals since 1999 has killed dozens of people on both sides and led to repeated calls for de-escalation from the United States and the G7 group of rich countries. "This thing that you have spoken about (nuclear option) is present, but let's not talk about it - we should treat it as a very distant possibility, we shouldn't even discuss it in the immediate context," Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif told ARY TV. "Before we get to that point, I think temperatures will come down. No meeting has happened of the National Command Authority, nor is any such meeting scheduled." The Guardian India and Pakistan have accused each other of cross-border missile strikes against major military targets, the most significant escalation so far in the brewing conflict between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. On Saturday, India accused Pakistan of launching strikes on dozens of airbases and military headquarters across north India, using long-range weapons, drones and fighter aircraft. The accusations came a few hours after Pakistan said India had fired six surface-to-air missiles targeting three of Pakistan’s most important military bases early on Saturday morning. Shortly afterwards, Pakistan officials confirmed they had begun their counter-attack against India, under the name Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos, a phrase from the Qur’an roughly translating to “wall of lead”. The claims of missile attacks on military targets deep inside India and Pakistan were seen as a worrying escalation in hostilities, bringing the two countries the closest they have been to war in decades. According to the Indian army spokesperson Col Sofiya Qureshi, Pakistan struck first on Saturday. At a press conference, the Indian army accused Pakistan of attacking 26 sites in India, including the Pathankot military airfield in Punjab, Srinagar airport and Udhampur air force base in Indian-administered Kashmir, as well as “deplorable and cowardly” attacks on civilian infrastructure. Qureshi said the “Indian Armed Forces successfully neutralised these threats” but added that some damage was done to equipment and personnel at four airbases. The foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said claims by Pakistani media that airbases and advanced weapons systems had been destroyed in the strikes were “heavy on lies, misinformation and propaganda”. Pakistan and India’s military right now:
  18. So now we’re quoting Hot Shots?
  19. Somebody else from the 60s…
  20. To quote one of our greatest philosophers of the 21st century: "My life is nothing I thought it should be and everything I was worried it would become"
×
×
  • Create New...