-
Posts
3456 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by hpslugga
-
-
6 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
Yeah ya did, but you circle the wagon types are all the same.
Except I didn't and your pissant ipse dixits are as useless as an asshole on an elbow. And what I implied was correct: you are absolutely incapable of thinking critically. All you ever do is emote, troll, react, and parrot.
-
17 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
But hey just ignore what he posted.
I didn't
-
2 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:3 minutes ago, hpslugga said:In a court of law, even a semi-competent prosecutor would have no difficulty whatsoever in refuting the living shit out of all of those points.
And I know that you're merely trotting out theories that they'll try, but I'm sure you'd agree that not one of them will stick.You're assuming the prosecutor wants to convict the defendant.
Now THAT point I'll concede, but if that's what we're dealing with then Brisket's 5 points are irrelevant as such a prosecutor would have his/her mind made up about that in the first place.
-
1 hour ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
Didn't think
You never do.
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, Brisketexan said:
I posited all of the possible angles of excuses and victim-blaming that I could think of.
I can comfortably conclude two things:
1) the defense will not present ALL of them as part of its theory.
2) the defense will definitely present at least ONE of them (probably more) as part of its theory.
To remind you, these are the facts/theories that could be deployed by the defense:
1) he was on drugs, and his erratic and dangerous behavior put her in fear for her life.
2) he was a drug dealer, and when he saw a cop, he panicked to protect his operation, and lunged at her.
3) he refused her lawful commands because he wanted to go over to the table and get rid of the evidence of his criminal behavior.
4) he refused her lawful commands because he was in a drug-fueled state of rage/threat.
5) upon opening the door, she smelled the distinct odor of marijuana, and thus was in a heightened state of alert.
I'm probably missing a couple. Want to make a wager on whether or not at least one of those theories is trotted out by the defense?
In a court of law, even a semi-competent prosecutor would have no difficulty whatsoever in refuting the living shit out of all of those points.
And I know that you're merely trotting out theories that they'll try, but I'm sure you'd agree that not one of them will stick.
-
16 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
Weed broken up and stored in multiple plastic bags is gonna be viewed as dealing. If it was all in one bag it can be argued personal use which is definitely better (not much use to him of course).
The whole things seems fucked up.
It makes no material difference who the weed belonged to or if it was going to be sold to anyone.
-
Oh and by the way, that 2015 OSU game was so rigged that even Vince Russo was saying "oh no one would ever believe that."
-
1 hour ago, kopp0e said:
Holds are hardly ever called accurately, we as fans might notice something on one play, while the ref is eyeing a separate area of the field... It's a hard job...
Back when I was playing JV football, we had a receiver that was actually shorter than me (I was 5'4") starting on our offense. We called a play where he and the other slot WR ran verticals and the outside WR's ran 5 yard stops. He broke clean of the one defender that was on him, but the QB overshot him by a good ten yards. His best friend's dad, who served in the USAF, was up in the stands and we could clearly hear him say "BENJAMIN, RUN FASTER!" the humor in it, of course, being that even Eric Metcalf couldn't have run down that ball.
So here's my "Benjamin, run faster" moment with regards to what you just said: It wouldn't have to be a hard job if they were better at it.
-
2
-
-
8 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:
They gone too. Artist sell directly to consumer through streaming or databases like amazon and iTunes.
And how is the music recorded?
jimmyjazz' analogy is spot on. Might seem easy to a critic, but give them a microphone and they sound like any other drunk-off-his-ass schmuck at a Japanese restaurant doing karaoke.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:
Greedy greedy greedy. Musicians should be paid for their live performance. The actual work. The model is old and outdated. They will not longer need to wait for their gold plated shark tanks.
Roaylties need to be reigned in. Writing one shitty pop song should never have been a life long income stream.
So just hand all of the money to the record company after a certain period?
-
2 hours ago, Bobby_Batronic said:
I nearly force choked Shawn Watson when he had the audacity to say that it would only take 3 years for the WR routes to look exactly as they were drawn up. Enjoy Pittsburgh Shawn.
If it takes you 3 years to teach WR routes, you're fucking doing it wrong. Sure it may seem exotic and scientific, but the thing is when the RPO guys are clearly doing it better than you are, if you're not re-thinking how you do shit, you're in the wrong business.
-
5 minutes ago, Eskimohorn said:
Harsin was our most talented offensive coordinator.
It's either Harsin or Gilbert, and it's very close.
-
1 hour ago, hayden_horn said:
you know that our constitutional republic guarantees certain freedoms that do not exist in other countries, right? you know that british law is different than that of the usa, right? that germany has different laws, and there are reasons for those differences, and that you don't have to agree with it, right?
moron.
hell, if hate speech becomes dangerous or threatening here in the usa, it becomes a crime. you know that as well, right?
you seem to want people purportedly on the right, on the fringe, to be able to harass and threaten people with some kind of "alternative truth" with impunity. that's not how shit works, dude.
Come on, dude. You know perfectly well that he knows absolutely none of what you just said.
-
1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:
It's in the FIRST PARAGRAPH of a Breitbart column
FIFY
-
5 hours ago, Continental Op said:
I think the fact TexasHammer thinks a guy getting his dog excited by saying "Do you want to gas the Jews" is "comedy gold" says pretty much everything we need to know about him.
That and the more pertinent fact that he’s absolutely wrong about absolutely everything he says.
-
1
-
-
Israel
in Cloak Room
4 hours ago, Iconoclast Texan said:The only way the Palestinians will no longer be obstinate and finally reach a peace deal for 2 states with the Israelis is for them to be compelled to do so by making it uncomfortable for them.
Let's please stop with this Make Believe and Pretend stuff. That's a precise opposite rendering of the diplomatic history and documentary record of this conflict going back over 40 years.
-
To quote Spencer Tillman in his last conversation with Jeff Alm, one day something very bad is going to happen to some of you motherfuckers.
-
21 minutes ago, Foosters said:
There was a decently sized contingent of posters on the old site who believed that private businesses should be able to do whatever they wanted. Yes, this would include an establishment refusing to serve African-American customers. Their thinking was that the free market would settle it and eventually put those places out of business. I'd be willing to wager over half of those posters are upset with "the socials" and want the government to do something about it.
Like someone else mentioned, it's classic victimizers-asserting-the-role-of-victim. In the case of the "market settling it," the only route to that is to create alternatives and let their own popularity speak for themselves. The problem is that the right wing is so embarrassingly retarded that it would look like the following:
Right-wing social: "We're hereforetheretohenceforth banning Elizabeth Warren because she's a fake Indian that peddles fake news."
Everybody else (on the remote possibility they even see it): "I'm washing my hair."
There is no market that would "settle" that reality for them. It's the same reason why Wikipedia doesn't give a fuck about Conservapedia.
Someone asked earlier why, since their ideas are so unpopular, is the GOP continuously able to win elections and control branches of government. The answer is simple: ideas and policy positions don't win elections in the United States. Money does. The one coherent rationalization the GOP has going for it is "well since roughly 90% of federal-level elections are won by the candidate that outspends his opponent, that means elections are bought, and that means we should be catering to the people who can buy them for us."
-
15 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:
Yeah, but this is different. Because reasons.
And things.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:
Well I don't care about Alex Jones, but I do care about free speech.
Again, what’s been happening with that feeble-minded piece of whacko has fuck all to do with free speech. Same goes with Milo, Coulter and that whole hee-haw gang of hoots, and the thing is that neither you nor anyone else will ever in your life be able to convince a learned person that free speech was/is in any way in play.
-
1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:
Oh, here we go again. Prepare thy anus for "Nazis were socialists, it says so right in the name".
Ain’t my anus that needs the preparing as that argument is 100% rectally derived.
-
1
-
-
On 9/6/2018 at 9:36 PM, Thetexashammer said:
I'm a big believer in free speech.
For someone that believes big, you seem to know little.
-
1 minute ago, FondrenRoad said:
However, we got along better in those times. That period of flexibility ended in 1971 with the 26th Amendment. The 27th Amendment passed 11 years later although it was a holdover from the 1700s, and not reflective of any modern movement.
21, but point taken.
-
17 minutes ago, Chrispy said:
But Trump!
That's not "But Trump," that's a cold hard fact. Trump and his supporters are absolutely incapable of handling reality. You managed to sneak in a reference to pretending with regards to whether or not that tart in the picture was giving a white supremacist gesture. Here's the problem with that: it changes absolutely nothing about Kavanaugh either way.
So yeah, ridicule certain people for pointing out a hand gesture, but that's just a distraction from the fact that this fucking cult is completely oblivious to the concept of reality. Trump's camp has a considerably large contingent of people who, on the basis of "there's no non-evidence," seriously believe that the world is run by an Eyes Wide Shut-esque cabal that operates a pedophilia ring out of pizza restaurants, that the cabal includes people like Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks, and that Donald Trump has living the past 70-odd years of his life in this Andy Kaufman-esque illusion in order to covertly integrate himself with these people so that he could become President of the United States, put on a White Knight suit (or a robe and wizard hat) and defeat this evil cabal. And keep in mind, this is a subset of Trump voters totally separate of those who beat themselves over the head with this fictitious notion that he was the "lesser of two evils in the 2016 election," the believers of which are every bit as deluded as the QAnon crowd. You, on the other hand, are addressing literally less than a handful of people who are questioning an irrelevant hand gesture. If you came here looking for whataboutism, there it is.
10 minutes ago, 936horn said:Do you have children? Serious question. If you do, you've done the ultrasounds. You've heard the heart beat. You maybe did the 3D ultrasound that I did, that hangs on the side of my fridge in which my daughter is sucking in her lower lip. Something I see her still do 18 months later. I posted the gif just to poke at him, because I know that I won't ever convince you that to me a fetus is indeed a baby, but hey, if you can do all that stuff (hear the heart, see the face) and still tell me that it isn't a baby until it's out of the womb, then that's your issue not mine.
He said "scientifically," not "emotionally."
Dallas officer kills man after mistaking apartment for her own, police say
in Daily Texan
Posted
I rest my case