-
Posts
3454 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by hpslugga
-
-
1 hour ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:
but you watch
Based on what?
-
On 4/4/2023 at 8:53 AM, HtownHorn said:
Vince took over creative last night at RAW. WWE is going to be a shit show for the foreseeable future.
He has always been in control of creative. Even when he took that brief hiatus, there’s no doubt he was constantly in Steph and HHH’s ears about it.
-
14 minutes ago, Lurch said:
Nope.
Hell the Supreme Court had to be asked whether or not they could intervene on behalf of a federal judge who had been convicted and sent to fucking prison and still wanted to be a judge from the inside of his cell.
The House voted to impeach, Senate voted unanimously to remove, and this motherfucker actually wanted the SCOTUS to overrule the removal.
But the point is it took acts from both chambers of congress to stop that freak from being a federal judge inside a goddamn prison cell since there is no explicit rule against it. So of course a criminal conviction doesn’t preclude Trump’s run.
And personally, I don’t want it to. I want Trump to be their nominee. He has no chance to win, and the more damage to the GQP his lingering in the mainstream of it, all the better.
As to Trump having a jury rule against him today…
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 5/6/2023 at 12:13 AM, atomheartbevo said:
Paxton
-
-
21 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:
Good luck with that 😂😂😂😂
-
On 5/1/2023 at 10:06 AM, YGIFS said:
To be fair to Donald, he has made more than a few wisecracks about his attraction to his own daughter. And like the rest of his attempts at humor, they don’t come across as funny, but rather awkwardly horrifying.
Of all the mysteries surrounding so many millions of American’s fascination with that piece of shit, the one which baffles me most is why people think of him as a ‘real man’s man’. His wife hates him, he has to pay for sex, he had an oddly tiny dick for such a big guy, his three wives have all cheated on him, and he openly talks about dating his daughter, and ignores the ugly one. It the literal opposite of masculinity.
It’s because he says the right words in the right tones. The people who are attracted to him are insanely superficial. Seriously that’s all that needs to be said about it.
-
1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:
Ana undoubtedly approves of this guy's actions.
Was the guy named Steven Crowder?
-
1
-
-
Just now, C-Man said:
Same. Now we have that cunt Beth Van Duyne.
People have asked me about her and the best description I can give is "50 degrees nuttier than Lisa Murkowski but 10 minutes short of Lauren Boebert."
-
30 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:
He should be my congressman instead of that stupid fuck lance gooden. Fuck gerrymandering.
He was mine until the latest freakshow moved him eastward.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, SKJ said:
I would like to add one thing.
Nowhere in the bible does it say to force your beliefs on another.
Nowhere in the bible does it say to be political and try to mold the world into its morality.
In fact, this:"Giving to God what belongs to God means seeing the face of God in every human being and respecting the dignity of each person and defending his or her right to life...”
O Could go on, cut there's no reason
That’s all well and good, but here’s the problem:
Far too often, religious people will read into their holy texts things they do not say, and then they will not read what it does say. So they read in between the lines, but they don’t read the lines.
-
2 hours ago, Captainant said:
This thread isn't about faith and beliefs, which are personal things. Per the title, it's about weaponized religion and the separation of church and state.
See, that’s the thing. There are people who cannot for the life of them understand the difference between the two. Interestingly, they who are guilty of this overwhelmingly tend to be on the same side of the aisle of this bullshit. It’s almost as if it’s an institutional blind spot.
-
1 hour ago, HamsterHookah said:
Just speaking for myself and absolutely not in a condescending way, others hostility or contempt and derision for my spiritual belief doesn’t affect my faith walk.
So let’s just start with “others hostility or contempt and derision.” That’s just a persecution complex that wanna-believers are well known to create.
Person A says “I don’t believe there is a God”
Person B says “person A is persecuting me and my faith!”
So it’s not so much that it affects your “faith walk,” it’s that your “faith walk” affects your judgment. You see persecution where there is none and persecutors where there are none.
1 hour ago, HamsterHookah said:I don’t even get mad or upset; I just feel a bit sad for them,
For what? That they don’t believe what you believe? Again spare us the “hostility and derision” schtick because that’s all an act. It’s pure make believe.
1 hour ago, HamsterHookah said:And it’s ironic because in my experience the more snowflakey sensitive bunch are the agitated anti-theists.
That’s just you projecting. You’ve been told repeatedly where they (we) stand on all this:
You want to believe in all that stuff? That’s one thing.
You want to force the state to teach my child that it’s all literally true? That’s a whole other ballgame.
And yeah, we don’t play that ballgame nicely, and we’re right not to.
The one thing religious adherents won’t say about that out loud in public is that “you have an obligation to just lay down and passively allow us to indoctrinate your kids,” but that’s what they want to do. That’s why this state, for example, is trying to ram the Bible down children’s throats. You will never see a secular humanist/atheist equivalent of that, at least not if you’re honest.
What you will see, to repeat, is the common refrain “separation of church and state,” and sans a handful of extremist barking lunatics, that’s as far as it goes. It’s pure theatrics to assert otherwise.
There are some religious adherents that are at least honest when they both acknowledge the existence of a separation of church and state and admit to being offended by it. But here is my response to it: thank you for your refreshing honesty; I’m offended that you’re offended.
-
5
-
3
-
-
10 hours ago, Patricio Swayze said:
Well said. But these assholes can’t help themselves. They think their belief is absolute and therefore it’s their right to impose their bullshit beliefs on everyone.
Fuck that.It’s really not even that. It really isn’t.
It’s that these wanna-believers are so damn fragile and insecure in their beliefs in superstitious and ridiculous nonsense that, to them, it can only be validated if enough of their peers believe like they do.
I saw up the thread the old “atheist atrocities” trope, but one in particular does bear mentioning: Pol Pot.
Pol Pot didn’t murder people in the name of atheism. Pol Pot murdered people because he was a rocket surgeon that acted purely out of fear. One of his fears, for example, was that people who wore eyeglasses were smarter than him. He probably was right in that they probably were.
The wanna-believers are of the same general inferiority complex. Just substitute “wore eyeglasses” with “do not believe in a deity” and see how well that fits on them.
-
1
-
-
37 minutes ago, Longhornfan1024 said:
You'll notice that @fattyflattie has responded to multiple posts in this thread since I called him out for his lies, but still hasn't responded to me. He's just proving to everyone that not only is he a liar, he's also a coward. A perfect encapsulation of so many right wingers.
Wait, you guys are still reading his bed-wetting effluvia?
-
2
-
-
Just now, Bozo_Casanova said:
Oh you had to know that was coming
-
On 4/21/2023 at 7:45 PM, Bama Chick said:
Alito’s dissent is absolutely disgusting.
He needs an ass kicking.His presence on the court in general has been absolutely disgusting.
-
1
-
-
42 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:
Tucker's followers think the People's Liberation Army is building bases on that land.
Yes, the land that accounts for less than half the acreage of the King Ranch.
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, Woland said:
Tucker is all over land being sold to the Chinese. I’m sure he will soon publish an award-winning expose on this threat to American democracy.
That is so fucking stupid, even for him.
-
1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:
There is a good chance, if not guaranteed, that UT drop in the educational rankings due to Abbott’s and Patrick’s actions.
They don’t care
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, GhostOfTomJoad said:
Anyone who thinks this settlement will cause either a) Fox News to change their journalistic standards to report more accurately and stop perpetuating GQP-friendly theories, or b) Fox consumers to question the validity of what they view on Fox is getting fucking high on their own supply.
Oh it certainly won’t. If the D’s are smart (ha!) they’ll accept invites to come on their network and they’ll constantly remind them that Biden won the election, Trump lost, and Trump lied about it. Just keep poking at that bear until it bites back. But of course we know the D’s love to miss opportunities, so they probably won’t do that.
-
4
-
-
8 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:
Neither of those are admissions that they lied.
I know. I was agreeing that what little they were saying about it was muddled at best.
EDIT: and you can bet that the terms of the settlement most definitely do not include a forced admission by FNC. At best what it contains is a provision that orders them to shitcan any further attempts to advance said lies.
-
23 minutes ago, bolverk said:
This statement is so muddled I can imagine it confusing some viewers to the extent they wouldn't quite understand it.
Website as well
-
24 minutes ago, Don Johnson said:
This. Yeah we all wanted to see the spectacle but that was never happening. They were as guilty as shit and didn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell surviving that case were it to have gone to the jury, and they knew that. The best they could have hoped for was to settle with terms that allow them to be as swagger-ish as possible about it.
That last line in the tweet was a good move, though. Fox loses either way with it.
-
1
-
Rank Big 3 cable news
in Cloak Room
Posted · Edited by hpslugga
They’re a de facto platform for a bizarre collection of social media personalities and the “political party” for whom they carry the water have adopted that same principle as an electoral strategy. Let’s all just sit back and let them continue because they’re on their asses and from said asses do they absolutely love to tell everyone willing to listen to their feeble effluvia that they “own the libs.” Nothing guarantees consistency in failure better than when said failures are absolutely convinced of their own success.