Jump to content

hpslugga

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3349
  • Joined

Everything posted by hpslugga

  1. You’re both wrong. Lauren is stupid, but she can also see the future. But the fact that she’s stupid makes it hard for her to tell the difference between future and present. In this instance, she was holding up what she thought were her sagging tits.
  2. Why am I looking at the last two and only hearing “You’ll shoot your eye out! You’ll shoot your eye out!”
  3. So stupid bullshit that’s well beyond their scope. Got it
  4. I would actually like to know what it was she was saying. I imagine it ran something along the lines of “your mother sucks cocks in hell,” but I would like to confirm.
  5. Cynical lazy ass motherfucker doesn’t even have the goddamn common courtesy to carefully construct a lie. Don’t have time? It take like 10 fucking seconds. He’s sitting there playing fucking make believe if he really thinks people take him for this 24-7-on-the-go-tough-alpha-male he pretends to be.
  6. This is an oversimplification because it depends on which years shock you the most, but: The great QB’s of that era were overwhelmingly AFC guys. Look through the NFC talent pool and tell me Aikman didn’t stand above almost all those losers.
  7. He also did this: “Matthew Stafford might not go down as the best quarterback in NFL history, but after winning the Super Bowl this year, he'll be able to say that he's pulled off a feat that no other quarterback has ever accomplished, including Peyton Manning and Tom Brady. Stafford threw for 283 yards and three touchdowns in the Rams' 23-20 Super Bowl win over the Bengals, which means he finished the regular season and playoffs COMBINED with 6,074 passing yards, 50 touchdown passes and a Super Bowl win, which makes him the FIRST quarterback in NFL history to hit all of those benchmarks.” https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/matthew-stafford-just-pulled-off-a-qb-feat-that-not-even-tom-brady-or-peyton-manning-ever-accomplished/amp/
  8. As should anyone be. Economists are not jacks of all trades as some fantasize. When they talk about the death penalty, global warming, abortion, creationism/evolution et al, they’re doing so as laymen and the title of “economist” in those discussions is as useless as an asshole on an elbow.
  9. And I should say, this isn’t a new phenomenon and it wasn’t even when that movie came out (2006). Anyone remember this fuckin bullshit? Yeah, that was 1970 and we still had this issue of putting morons like Lester Maddox on TV. Maddox became governor of Georgia after an infamous incident where he refused to serve blacks in his restaurant after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, which is like Kyle Rittenhouse becoming governor of Wisconsin. Anyways, the mere idea of putting him alongside Jim Brown to talk about race relations is like putting Seth Rogen and Dick LeBeau side by side on an ESPN show to debate each other about “the 4-3 vs the 3-4.” This is by no means the first time crap like this was splattered on television, and that’s really the point: it’s always been like this and there’s been no significant push to change it.
  10. Yes and then move it to the fall and murder the league
  11. “Okay be honest. How many of us own a Youth Medium "Scots for Stafford" shirt? Seems like there are a couple. You can't hide!” 🙃
  12. He got negged bc he negged my OP, not because he “disagreed.” As someone else said, that’s just an indicator of sucking at life.
  13. It will and it'd be bullshit if he didn't. But that's not why I was dismissive of his name being mentioned. I asked a simple question that multiple posters are taking great care to avoid answering. EDIT: He'll cover Marino on the yards (he's only like 1,600 short, so he'll cover it this coming season barring an injury) but not sure on the TD's. Not that it makes any difference, but just had to point that out.
  14. Yes. Same reason that Warren Moon was: he's a stat guy, but a monster stat guy to an extent that you'd be hard pressed to make an honest case for him not being there.
  15. It's actually worse than you think: Detroit's been one of the worst franchises in the last 60 years. Uh no he won't. But you're missing the whole point of the question. The point is that the answer is "there is none that fit that description," so you'd be asking the HOF to consider making a special exception based on what amounts to the fallacy of special pleading. That is the red flag.
  16. Matt Ryan does not fit the description I gave you. You knew that.
  17. The red flag is in your reasoning. You’re refusing to answer a simple question, which tends to suggest that you’re arguing in bad faith. Again, what QB that had 50k yards and 300 TD’s along with a ring has been turned away by the HOF?
×
×
  • Create New...