Playing this scheduling alliance out a bit further, what actually may make more sense is to go to 32.
For the sake of argument, let's say the Big Ten takes ISU/KSU and the Pac 12 takes Tech/OSU/KSU and likely TCU over Baylor because they played in the Rose Bowl once and, at least publicly, are less rapey. If the Rose Bowl tie breaker doesn't work than I recommend a knife fight between the University presidents, "Beat It" style, where the winner gets the last spot once they've drank all the blood of the vanquished.
Both conferences could go 4 pods of 9 conference games, which gives you 3 in your own, and two in every other pod per year. The B1G likely wouldn't gain money, but they wouldn't lose any either and the Pac would increase considerably with games in the central, especially Texas.
Then the B1G and Pac could do a two game scheduling alliance, which would give said 25% boost and they'd be up to 11 P5 games a year, leaving one open for either ND or the Sisters of the Blind.
Want to increase it about 5-10% more? Schedule more conference games the weekend of the champ game, like the Covid make ups this year, between schools who didn't play each other. No reason everyone can't get 13 games in. Add that up and the B1G is looking at a contract worth north of $75M per team and basically controls half of college football (the Pac can't say no with the B1G's dick in its mouth) from LA to NYC.
That could definitely boost value considerably and would likely force the ACC to get into bed fully with the SEC to match up.
You're welcome, Bowlsby.