Jump to content

Lonestar88

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Lonestar88

  1. Slim Charles one of the most underrated Wire characters.
  2. That’s actually pretty crazy considering how much the ratings services have shit on our commits after they committed to us. Damn near every player on our commit list dropped after committing to us and ,the opposite has happened for aggy, and we’re 1 player from passing them anyway.
  3. In this scenario, ESPN would lose all games for North Carolina, Virginia, and Miami, because they don’t have Big 10 rights and parts of Duke, Pitt and Louisville because the Big 12 rights are split with FOX. Is that worth just 36M in savings? That’s not that great of a deal for ESPN. Also, 31 million is a steep pay cut for Duke, Pitt, and Louisville, and the Big 12 contract isn’t big enough in the future to make up for it.
  4. He is legitimately a fucking moron. ASU fans better be glad they’re tied to hips of UofA.
  5. Exactly. I don’t know why this is so hard for people to grasp. The Tv networks are the ones in charge here and ESPN has no incentive to break apart the ACC right now.
  6. The Big 10’s current contracts run until 2030. So UO and UW won’t get full shares until then.
  7. I don't see it this way at all. ESPN and FOX were willing to pay the SEC and the BIG more money in part because they knew they weren’t going to pay the PAC. And now they get all of the best teams from the PAC anyway. That Apple deal was so shitty that the PAC decided to disband instead. Maybe they will be in the future, but Apple isn’t a threat to ESPN or FOX yet.
  8. This all could just be Oregon and UW trying to get leverage in negotiations with the Big 10.
  9. If UO and UW stay in the Pac-12, I assume they either didn’t get the Big 10 offer at all or it was insanely and insultingly low.
  10. That would be less money. MWC teams get 4 mil a year per team.
  11. Well, the alternative is the Pac disintegrates and they make even less money.
  12. ESPN absolutely paid for Texas and OU, just not in the way you think. They had to pay Fox. Fox has Big 12 rights and we’re losing their two biggest bell cows. They got compensated for that by ESPN, with money and additional inventory. I don’t think the exact amount was ever made public though. Theres no such problem for these departing PAC-12 schools though, because the Pac doesn’t have a tv deal. So any network money spent can just go the the conference/schools.
  13. Nebraska didn’t get a full share until their 7th year in the conference. Rutgers and Maryland didn’t get it until their 8th. USC and UCLA are getting full shares immediately. So that tells you how much the Big 10 wanted each school. Washington and Oregon are desperate and have no leverage because they don’t really want to go to the Big 12 and the Big 10 is kind of lukewarm on them anyways. They aren’t going to get full shares for a while.
  14. This would be my hope. I know Duncanville would like their guys to announce before the season and that would make the Durham and Simmons announcements make sense even if they weren’t going to the same school. But if it’s not a Duncanville thing, then it’s hard for me to find another way to spin it. Now that’s an interesting twist.
  15. Simmons and Durham have been mirroring each other with their announcement tweets, and Durham is going to LSU. Hard to see that as a positive for us.
  16. The handwringing over the Umeozulu brothers is so dumb to me. They barely even talk, most of the drama surrounding them is created by this board. Zina is not a recruitment you should spend any time handwringing about, he will commit to us in the fall or he won’t. He’s not a must get and given what we know about the parents he’s not going to decommit and commit a bunch of times or do a bunch of outlandish stuff. There’s not much to even discuss.
  17. Why not? It’s definitely weak, but that’s what’s been reported.
  18. If I’m Oregon, I’m making the move to the Big 12. The Big 10 is clearly waiting for the ACC to destabilize, those are the targets they really want. (I’m including ND in this) And USC will do everything in their power to stop Oregon from getting in. When you see reports about USC not wanting other west coast teams in because of recruiting challenges, they are specifically talking about Oregon, that’s by far their biggest west coast threat.
  19. Sure, but the point is there are considerations beyond good football matchups. And those other considerations aren’t in Utah’s favor.
  20. If this were just about good football matchups then they wouldn’t have taken Colorado, and they sure as hell wouldn’t be contemplating UConn. Money wise, it’s better to get into the Arizona market than take a second team from Utah.
×
×
  • Create New...