RayDog

Feel free to point out flaws in my papers rather than make broad baseless accusations.

With the next supreme court they will.

It will help the Democrats when DC and Puerto Rico are granted statehood in 2021 adding 4 senate seats. It will make it difficult for the Republicans to control the senate in the following decades.

This is so stupid. Where I am living young people come from the provinces to the bigger cities like Manila all the time because a "cousin" or "aunt" can help them get work. This is not trafficking, it is the way most of the world works for young people looking for new opportunities.

No. I published it in my book The Zero-Point Universe first, so journals would not look at it. I will also say that I am for open-access, so I would not publish in most journals. Lately of have been publishing to GSJournal, which is not peer reviewed in a strict sense, but the editors are competent at performing a review. I also copy my work on researchgate.net and academia.edu, as I often get good feedback there. I still have not found someone to give me access to arxiv, as non-academic researchers like me often get frozen out by them.

Some posters like to attack my science or lifestyle rather than respond to my on-topic posts. I will defend myself from personal attacks but would prefer that they stayed on-topic. As far as vixra goes I know it is mostly garbage but I often put a copy of my papers there because I can get an extra 500 reads.

The recent Emerson poll showed a generic ballot of 49 to 42 favoring Democrats but in the Midwest states it was 52 to 38. There appears to be backlash against Trump in the Midwestern states.

First I will say that it took 100s of physicists to mathematically compute the nuclei using the present fictional forces of the standard model. I will not waste my life trying to replicate that work, so I will leave it to others. Gluons are fictional as opposed to the electrons in quantum field theory being well known experimentally. No force physically arises due to particle exchange so the strong force is magic, rather than physically real. Quantum van der Waals forces are physically real and there is a physical mechanism for how those quantum vibrations push on particles and other objects due to degeneracy pressure. We have a physically real model to explain the Casimir effect. At least we do up to the point of describing the force responsible for degeneracy pressure and the Pauli exclusion principle, but I have a working hypothesis that I hope to develop. You do not have a good grasp of quantum field theory and particle decay, so note that the highest energy quantum fluctuations are the shortest wavelengths. Thus the highest energy Casimir effect is at the closest distances. The distance between nucleons within a nucleus are consistent across all nuclei, so the Casimir effect between any two particles is the same. Adding more nucleons does not reduce the force between any two nucleons. With larger nuclei the force is slightly greater because more longer wavelengths are excluded from the nucleus. However, those are longer less energetic wavelengths, so the effect is a bit smaller. As the protons quantum jump they usually get pulled back in by the Casimir effect because they are so massive that they do not jump far enough to escape. And then a neutron pulls it back in due to the Casimir effect As for decay, those are due to weak interactions that are due to quantum jumps of electrons and positrons. Electrons jump into protons and turn them into neutrons and electrons jump out of neutrons turning them into protons. Mostly electrons just jump around within a stable nucleus, but sometimes one gets captured or escapes. Longer wavelength electron-positron quantum fluctuations cannot exist within a large nucleus since the space is occupied, so the range of the electron jumps is limited except at the outer edges of large nuclei. It is not strange to compute the Coulomb force between two spheres based on the distance between the center of the spheres. As with gravity the effects of a spherical body make it appear that the force is emanating from a point at the center. Review any freshman physics text if you forgot that.

Reproducible, yes. I also should have added logical to my list. Many popular physics theories, or theories in general, fail simple tests of logic.

I base scientific robustness on observations and experiments not popularity contests.

The PFA equation for the Casimir effect is admittedly over-simplistic, but that does not mean it goes away. The Casimir force is always present. Just because you are considering a bigger nucleus does not make the force disappear as you suggest. I leave mathematical grunt work like what you suggest to others. To get the distance between charges add 2 times the charge radius to the distance between the outer surfaces. Coulomb attraction of a sphere assumes that the charge is at the center. I graphed it that way to illustrate the crossing point between the Coulomb and Casimir force. I am sorry if you find that confusing. Helium 3 is stable because the protons tend to align on opposite sides of the neutron. So even when the protons jump around they are still attracted to the neutron by the Casimir forces. I can, for example, call any physicists that agree with special relativity a liar, because special relativity assumes that the quantum field and quantum field theory does not exist, therefor special relativity is a lie. (That does not mean that all relativity theory is a lie.) Most physicists know that the two theories are incompatible and yet they lie about special relativity anyway. Now some deny the existence of the quantum field, the Casimir effect, the Lamb shift, the correction to the g factor, diamagnetism, and quantum van der Waals forces, which are all necessarily part of quantum field theory, so they are a different sort of liar.

Gohmert likes it when Gym Jordan sticks a finger in his ass when they wrestle.

Then I was probably there too. I was always there back then.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/a3qz3j/trump-was-like-a-predator-toward-teens-at-parties-in-80s-and-90s-says-bbc-report Trump was a sex pest per a new BBC documentary going to parties with 14 to 17 year old girls.

I just saw that 5 swing voters in the senate, 3 Democrats and 2 Republicans (the usual suspects), declined an invite to the announcement.

You mean the ones who believe they have mindless brains and brainless minds that are non-physical and can somehow occupy a non-physical space yet still communicate with physical reality?

I saw something the other day that compared the presidential winning percentages by state from 2012 and 2016 and looked at the percentage change. The average swing was 4.3% to the Republicans because Hillary sucked as a candidate and Trump's message resonated with many people, much more than Romney. I found it interesting that Texas had the second largest Democratic swing of any state (not counting Utah) at 6.8%. If the Democrats had a much better candidate it could have been 10 points. From that perspective the 5 point difference in the latest UT poll is not surprising. Here are the top swings toward the democrats. California 7.3 Texas 6.8 Arizona 5.6 D.C 5 Massachusetts 4.5 Georgia 2.7 Virginia 1.5 Washington 1.33 Kansas 1 Maryland 0.6 Illinois 0.2 Note the swings of Arizona and Georgia which will definitely be swing states in 2020, with Virginia moving more solidly democratic.

Much of mainstream standard model physics is incompatible with standard model quantum field theory. Since quantum field theory describes the material substance of space itself, all of physics must be compatible with quantum field theory in order to be valid.

It doesn't. Not only that, a hypothetical god violates the principles of physics, because if it couldn't violate the principles of physics it wouldn't be a god. But if it does violate the principles of physics and more generally science and reason, it cannot exist.

In response, the Casimir effect exists and applies in all cases when bodies, including particles, are present and at close distances. I did not misappropriate it. The Casimir effect between two plates is the Casimir effect between electrons on the surface of the plates. (Note that the solidity of matter is due to the electron degeneracy pressure between those electrons as established by Freeman Dyson) The equation I used does account for 3 dimensions, but it does not account for all the Casimir forces, which is why I did not get 100x. (Note that I have been trying to work on or find a better equation to use in a follow-up paper.) My friend who successfully computed the binding energy for the deuteron also did so for tritium and and helium, so your argument that the Casimir effect does not apply for more than two bodies at once is nonsense. You calculated the Coulomb force using the wrong distance. The table uses the distance between the outer radii of the protons, not the distance between the center of the protons, which is how you compute the Coulomb force. As for the two proton problem, It is unstable because protons make quantum jumps an uncountable number of times each second, so they tend to jump away from each other so fast that we can never see them together in a metastable state under normal conditions. Degeneracy pressure and the force behind Pauli's Exclusion Principle are not speculative forces. Two protons, two neutrons, or a proton and neutron can never occupy the same point in space. As for quantum jumps, you can also consider that the neutrons in the nucleus actually do decay but the temporarily free electron is usually immediately recaptured by another proton converting it to a neutron, so there is continuous electron exchange going on. Contrary to mainstream physics there is no binding energy associated with this particle exchange. The binding energy come from the Casimir effect. It is amazing to consider that every particle in our body is being replaced trillions of times each second.

I am looking forward to seeing the donation numbers for the second quarter coming out this week. Beto has already said the numbers are up, which is not surprising since his media attention went way up in April after the Quinnipiac poll came out showing only a 3 point gap (when it was realistically more like 6-7). Where does he go from $6.7 million from 141,000 donations.

The Casimir effect between two proton and/or neutron sized spheres is strong enough to account for the nuclear force. The Casimir effect is physically real as it has been experimentally proven. A physicist I know was able to accurately compute the binding energy of a deuteron using this approach, after I shared my research with him. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283795494_The_Nuclear_Force_Computed_as_the_Casimir_Effect_Between_Spheres Note that I would like to streamline this paper a bit as I go into some speculative territory when trying to explain how there is a repulsive force that overcomes the Casimir effect at distance less than 0.7 fm. That can be more simply explained by the force responsible for the Pauli Exclusion Principle and neutron degeneracy pressure.

Yes, case law.

The last Muslim ban is a great example if this.

It is also rooted in mind brain duality which is nonsense. The mind is the brain and when the brain dies the mind dies.