Jump to content

'stache

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    16630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by 'stache

  1. And from drag queens reading story books.
  2. I guess I haven't been following this close enough because I've assumed nothing would happen. Why would 100 GOP representatives vote against the discharge petition but for the file release? Why would any GOP senator vote against dear leader? They don't have the cunt cabal that crossed over in the House for the discharge petition. If dotard vetoes no way in hell any of them cross him with an override. That would be the end of their careers. No maga voter is going to hold any of this against them, they might grumble a bit on twitter, but they'll always vote against the opponent, because trans etc.
  3. I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist.
  4. I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators.
  5. Legitimately shocked, if true. I don't have any particular love or hate for Bill Clinton but I fully expected him to be all up in those files. If he's not, it'll be hilarious, because he was the highest level democrat who we expected to be in there.
  6. Ok, so what's next? If he doesn't want the other files released, they won't be released, period. Mike Johnson can't stop the vote, but I don't even know what the vote is for, can Congress literally just say to release everything and it happens? Would some of the republicans who voted this week to hold a vote then vote to not release them? Are the files still confidential litigation materials? Could dotard just designate them as classfied and tell his dipshit followers that he's doing it for national security to avoid distractions even though they totally exonerate him? The last part is what I suspect will ultimately happen. If they are released there's no way they didn't fuck with them to remove anything incriminating on dear leader, right?
  7. So in states where weed isn't legal people could get high on THC soda? That seems really weird. How would this kill the THC soda instustry though? Weed is still legal in a bunch of states. Those sodas are in every Oklahoma dispensary. I don't partake because they are way too strong, I only do low dose edibles.
  8. He has to go to Penn State first before he can extend with them.
  9. I'll never believe that, it's not remotely plausible. Nobody familiar with basketball would think it was a worthwhile trade. Hell, nobody familiar with the concept of barter would consider those values and think it was a worthwhile trade. The decision came from above for nefarious reasons. I can speculate on all sorts of reasons that have been hashed out enough. The fact that Luka went to the league's most valuable franchise needing a younger generational super star to stay relevent, the NBA didn't step in despite the absurdity of the value exchange, and the Mavs then magically fell into the top overall pick with low odds in the lottery, confirms in all material respects that shenanigans were at play. Argue against that all you want, you might convince others, but not me, there is zero logic that supports that any person would make that trade voluntarily without other factors at play.
  10. Yup. Just call him a douche and move along.
  11. All he has to do is say “fake news” and half the country nods along. They also believe inflation is down and that the economy is the best economy in the history of evar. Another round of trans panic or Mexican CARAVANS can always be deployed if necessary. Literally nothing changes these peoples’ minds and it all feels pointless.
  12. I wonder how much Adelson paid him to go away and keep quiet that the trade was her idea?
  13. He can do that but LSU can legitimately sue and argue that 200k at ESPN is far less than he’d get if he pursued a coaching job diligently and in good faith. He can’t be forced into any particular job but he has to consider the possible reduction of the buyout if he takes a “break” at a significantly lower salary. Schools might not bother to pursue the claim especially if they think it’s temporary and that he’ll go back to coaching for a high salary within a year or two and also to avoid pr issues but it would be a legitimate claim under the contract. I’m not aware of any situation in which a buyout was paid over several years with legitimate mitigation calculations, they always settle, because that’s what the clauses are designed to accomplish. The for cause stuff is ridiculous though and makes them look really bad. It also appears to be diminishing the possibility of a settlement. I doubt it will affect the hiring process though, they’ll throw a ton of money at someone who will take it expecting to win and not have to worry about buyouts.
  14. Bullshit, you fucking liar. I guess the Mormons have finally joined mainstream evangelicalism when it comes to this shit.
  15. "Kelly’s contract contains a “Duty to Mitigate” clause. This clause explicitly requires Kelly to “exercise due diligence and good faith in seeking qualifying employment so long as the liquidated damage obligation exists.” Or, in simple terms, Kelly has to look for another job, and any money that he gets paid from that job would then be used to reduce LSU’s payment." https://huddleup.substack.com/p/inside-brian-kellys-54-million-lsu Thus, he can't sit on his ass and demand full payment. And he can't just go to the local juco and take minimum wage as an "analyst" and collect the balance from LSU. He has to exercise "due diligence and good faith" and therefore he has to actually try to find a good high paying job. If he claims that he tried and struck or could only get a low paying job he needs proof. The fact is that someone would hire him as a HC and pay him well this cycle. He can either let that process play out and if he gets paid less than the buyout collect the balance from LSU, or if he does not want to pursue new employment at this time, take a settlement. The clause is designed to incentivize both sides to settle for a reasonable amount.
  16. I didn't post the video of him crying about cloak room shit. And yeah, calling someone a "communist" who "hates america" is dangerous political rhetoric. The fact that you likely believe it proves the fucking point because neither is remotely true.
  17. Oh you have a concern about dangerous political rhetoric? Yahoos saying stupid shit that puts people in danger? Okaaaaaaaaay …. Full. Fucking. Cloak room. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2025/11/06/dave-portnoy-zohran-mamdani-barstool-new-york-move/87132339007/
  18. I think they can get a high level coordinator and is probably the best move imo.
  19. This. Fans need to start “Sell the Team” chants. Be as unrelenting as Fire Nico. She told Nico to do the trade, you’ll never convince me otherwise. Even if I’m wrong they still need to disappear for me to give a single fuck about this franchise ever again.
  20. That’s exactly how this is supposed to play out. He has a duty to mitigate so will never get the full amount. He can argue that he ruined his own reputation and isn’t worth a whole lot but somebody will/would hire him at some level. He can’t just do nothing and get the full amount, he’s supposed to at least try to find employment. And yeah, this cycle, he’ll get a job somewhere that will likely overpay and he could end up way better off by taking a settlement. If they are truly lowballing him though he can make them litigate but he’d also be in a position of having incentive to not get a good job. The “for cause” thing is so dumb, they’ll never win that, even if there’s something it didn’t come up at the time they fired him, it was purely wins and losses which is not cause or moral turpitude.
×
×
  • Create New...