Jump to content

'stache

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    15902
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by 'stache

  1. I will say I did not know until after the movie that Happy’s daughter and AA friend were (a) two different people and (b) Sandler’s real life daughters. I honestly thought it was weird at first that his daughter took him to AA and was acting weird. I eventually figured out they were different people. I then almost cringed at the thought they might make the AA friend a love interest and was glad they didn’t go down that road, wouldn’t have had that concern if I had known at the time, lol.
  2. Quick aside, my wife and I are in our early 40's and she received this issue, addressed directly to her. I've been making fun of her ever since. Seriously though, how does AARP decide who they mail the magazine to? We certainly didn't sign up for it.
  3. I'm not sure that LIV merging with PGA would have changed the story line all that much. The Maxi league had to be over the top absurd for the story line to work in Happy Madison style.
  4. I don't recall if it was addressed in any earlier episodes, but I thought she grew up with the Berzattos similar to Claire, either as a neighborhood kid or close friend of another family member. In the wedding episode she appeared to be close the Sarah Paulson's character. I didn't think that she met Richie and then the family but the other way around. I could be wrong, like I said I often miss small dialogue meant to fill in gaps. I sort of agree that it's not a usual relationship, but defining family by extension is kind of a theme throughout the series.
  5. I thoroughly enjoyed it and was way better than I expected. Kept pretty true to the original with some over the top cartooney humor and like others have said we loved it back then and can't really criticize it now. The cameos were pretty good. I don't watch golf but caught some of the people in the room. The Maxi thing was almost certainly inspired by LIV but it went over the top as one should expect from the Happy Madison universe so didn't bother me at all.
  6. I guess since I looked into this last week I'm now getting a bunch of reels of these two on the red carpet in different situations and they are pretty handsy and familiar with each other. Pretty clear its their relationship. I could totally see him being gay, but would be weird that he wouldn't just come out openly.
  7. Spotted on the expressway in Tulsa this weekend.
  8. Transparency about what? This is what is so dumb. What is fair market value and what is pay for play? If Big Red Sports and Imports wants to pay the qb $10M to show up for 20 minutes and sign a few autographs who is to say that’s not fair value? Or more importantly, why even pretend that “pay for play” isn’t happening or is bad? Isn’t fair market value what the market is willing to pay? If Cody what’s his name wants at Tech wants to pay $2M to a rb and outbids aggy isn’t that the definition of market value? Pretending that it isn’t pay for play is where this whole thing becomes absurd.
  9. That makes so much sense, HAHAHAHABA. My group texts are wild right now. I haven’t laughed this hard in years!
  10. “Retro” HAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!
  11. This is my favorite part, hahahaha! Some hairy bush lady on a milking table or something. Kinky little shit with his fetish. While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding.
  12. I don’t even know where to put this but LOLLLL! https://nondoc.com/2025/07/25/board-members-tv-in-ryan-walters-office-displayed-nude-women-during-executive-session/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLw09pleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHhZ12GnIJDshq1eVRh9j8I8FZq_axEFkq2vIlNGkoHNWaDWQp8QEzwGWVdh7_aem_08HSoRDSg_onQ16X4rs6qw Board members: TV in Ryan Walters’ office displayed nude women during executive session Two members of the Oklahoma State Board of Education were “shocked and mad” when they saw a video featuring “naked women” on the television screen in Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters’ office during the executive session portion of Thursday’s meeting. While neither Becky Carson nor Ryan Deatherage could tell what video was displaying nude women on Walters’ office TV, each told NonDoc they were the only people seated in a position to see the screen. Deatherage said he noticed the video first while a parent was speaking about her appeal of a district transfer denial. As Deatherage weighed his options about how to bring the video to the room’s attention, Carson noticed the nudity. “I was like, ‘What am I seeing?’ I kind of was in shock, honestly. I started to question whether I was actually seeing what I was seeing,” Carson said. “I was like, ‘Is that woman naked?’ And then I was like, ‘No, she’s got a body suit on.’ And it happened very quickly, I was like, ‘That is not a body suit.’ And I hate to even use these terms, but I said, ‘Those are her nipples.’ And then I was looking closer, and I got a full-body view, and I was like, ‘That is pubic hair.’ Even right now, I couldn’t even tell you what I was watching.” As Carson processed what she was seeing, she said “the mama bear and teacher in me came out” and she “stopped the meeting cold” by confronting Walters. “I was so disturbed by it, that I was like — very loudly and boastfully, like I was a parent or a teacher — I said, ‘What is on your TV? What am I watching?’ He was like, ‘What? What are you talking about?’ He stood up and saw it. He made acknowledgment that he saw it,” Carson recalled. “And I said, ‘Turn it off. Now.’ And he was like, ‘What is this? What is this?’ So he acknowledged it was inappropriate just by those words. And he was like, ‘I can’t get it to turn off. I can’t figure out how to turn it off.’ And I said, ‘Get it turned off.’ So he finally got it turned off, and that was the end of it. He didn’t address it. He didn’t apologize. Nothing was said.” While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding. “I don’t know if he turned it off or switched the channel, I don’t remember,” Deatherage said. “I was surprised that when he came back to the table, he was not apologetic. I didn’t ever hear an apology for that being on, and he didn’t seem to be fazed that it was on.” Carson said Walters “blew it off” and acted as if he had “just been caught” in an embarrassing situation. “Like a teenager when you walk in the room and they’re doing something they’re not supposed to be doing,” Carson said.
  13. If you're legitimately letting friends and family stay for free, sure. A very rich person would have to be seriously committed to this idea to legitimately bestow upon a township sized population free housing. At some point a traditional enforcement agency could probably pursue this as an obvious rouse but it wouldn't be super clear. I get the sense from the article that they are contemplating some form of indirect compensation for the living accomodations and it would be pretty easy at that point for a traditional enforcement agency to break through the rouse and get to the illegal discriminatory intent. I use the word "traditional" because that's not the world we're living in currently and this arrangement will not have any problems even if set up as a traditional landlord tenant relationship.
  14. How would they preclude a Black or Hispanic person from being admitted to the "club" or LLC or from donating to the cause and being provided with a home? Traditionally, it would be easy to break through whatever pretext they put together and get to the blatantly discriminatory intent. I'm actually surprised to don't set this up as a church that allows its members to live on the property in exchange for weekly tithing. "My religion precludes me from associating with non-Aryan people" would be consistent with recent SCOTUS rulings on religious freedom. They'd get away with it pretty easily if they did it that way tbh.
  15. He would have said the exact same thing, word for word, if we had admitted Memphis under those terms. He's on the afternoon radio here now since ou joined and even if I was an sec fan I have no idea how people can stand listening to this chode.
  16. The answer to your question is that it is illegal under the Fair Housing Act and numerous other laws and policies. It's very relevant however that it is almost certain that they would not be enforced so as a practical matter it's not illegal.
  17. Fair housing act? LOL, who the fuck is gonna enforce it these days? I fully expect that race based restrictive covenants are on their way back.
  18. I don't get the recent obsession with trying to force sports into places designed for other sports. Like bowl games in baseball stadiums and this baseball field inside a NASCAR track. The views look terrible and I don't get the appeal, like at all. "Cool, it's a race track, but with baseball." The only version of this that makes sense is NHL in baseball and football stadiums becasue it seems cool to play a cold weather sport outside...in cold weather. This is just stupid imo.
  19. Every word the man says is cloak room. They set it up this way on purpose. It's one thing to ask the president about their opinions on topics of the day but to do this by executive order is part of this country's ongoing conversation about executive powers. The legislature might have a role in this, the president would have a say if it got to that, but again, the executive order and the president's ongoing actions in all aspects of society is what takes this to CR and beyond. Especially with how he's treating colleges in general these days on a variety of topics. LOL at anyone who thinks he can be taken seriously on anything other than in a purely cloak room context.
  20. He was in town last year promoting that shitty beer. That’s probably not his fault though. Troy Aikman’s beer sucks too.
  21. This has as much force and effect as if I jotted it down and posted it on Facebook. It means literally nothing. The House Settlement also is going to try and essentially do what this order says with the NlL clearinghouse to determine that the payments are for legitimate value of NIL and I think everyone knows that’s a joke too and will be challenged if they ever try to cancel anyone’s bag. But I guess he tried lol.
  22. I felt I was missing a reference and I guess it was succession. I still laughed a lot. Enjoying this season.
  23. We’ll take Arky. Aggy can go fuck themselves.
×
×
  • Create New...