Jump to content

'stache

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    14101
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by 'stache

  1. Completely bungled abortion too because he cannot hide from his past statements supporting all out bans.
  2. Conservatives saying he did a good job just proves they have zero principals on policy. He was wishy washy on abortion after they’ve told us for 40 fucking years that it should be abolished. Wish washy on gun violence when they’ve said any restriction is illegal. Said Dotard saves the ACA when they tried multiple times to abolish it. Just pure fucking nonsense. It’s truly said that going 90 minutes without a toddler style insult qualifies as good. I’m just glad that vp debate means nothing. Donald will keep being a piece of shit, let’s just get through October and we can finally throw him in the trash bin of history.
  3. If anyone in the middle was thinking "maybe this guy is at least a little normal" he just fucking blew it, lol. What a fucking coward, couldn't address that his boss lost the fucking election.
  4. Move everyone to Nevada! Alaska? Sounds like a hell of a solution.
  5. With who though? The people who vote only because trump aren't going to like this and the never trumpers aren't going to vote for ticket still headed by donald fucking trump.
  6. This is boring as fuck. That's probably a good thing.
  7. I get the sense that Vance is actually being too nice for the typical magats taste.
  8. Lol, he just admitted that democrats aren't trying to lift the partial birth abortion ban. What about the murder after birth policies the democrats support?
  9. Ask the magats to look at the tags on their maga gear "made in china"
  10. "I was told there would be no fact checking" should be considered a hell of a blunder but we're not living in a sane world.
  11. Lol, Lankford gonna get his ass voted out for trying to actually do something
  12. That sounded nothing like "the largest deportation in history."
  13. Nothing will come of this, Vance is at least respectful, Walz is clear, nobody is answering the questions directly. More people are watching the baseball playoff game.
  14. I don't think it changes the numbers for the AAC teams. If anything, I think it's odd that Gonzaga is going to be getting part of the football money without playing football, that means less football revenue for the football playing programs. I might be thinking of it wrong but that's how I interpreted the latest Gonzaga articles. Overall, I just don't see the new PAC media contract being more than the AAC, at least not enough to cover the extra travel expenses with enough leftover to say they are truly better off going west than staying AAC.
  15. The only advantage you get by betting on your own team is if you intentionally lose or shave points. I find it implausible after he finally admitted to betting on games he's managing that it was for his team to win. He had to have been betting against them and tinkering just enough to ensure he wins the bets.
  16. So is TXST joining the PAC? That would put both at 8 football playing members.
  17. Gonzaga getting a full share without playing football is really odd. Looks like they make about $3.2M in the WCC which is most of that conferences' distribution, so it's a big boost assuming PAC gets $10-$12M. The economics are odd though but good for them. We'll see if they continue their run when Few retires. https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/gonzaga-bulldogs/gonzaga-would-see-disbursements-more-than-double-in-joining-pac-12/
  18. I always thought the clips of his head first slides looked goofy and unnecessary.
  19. Sounds like he hurt the longevity of another players career by being an asshole in an exhibition game.
  20. RIP. I'm pretty indifferent about the HOF. If they let him in posthumously I think it's obviously well deserved. If not, he broke a pretty important rule and I think the decision is justified. I always had the sense that the gambling thing was even more important at the time because of the mob's monopoly on gambling in most major cities.
  21. If republicans get 51 or more seats can they reinstate the 60 threshold for scotus nominees by simple majority?
  22. Blatant interference, why so late with the obvious flag?
  23. I think legislation would more likely just provide an exemption from antitrust laws.
×
×
  • Create New...