triplehorn

Take a step back and look at the larger timeline. Some poster(s) spiked the football at the 50 yard line back in March-May with baseless mocking and bad understanding. The evidence in support of early home treatment using several agents was emerging early on confounded by a fraudulent study in Lancet, and a shitgibbon no one trusts. But that evidence has more than quadrupled since the summer, particularly in the last 2-3 months. Those who spiked at the 50 back then can't acknowledge they fumbled today. This isn't a competition. The evidence is clear and overwhelming. I know you're not a science denier. Prove the science wrong. No one is doing that. It's quack, clown, gif, blah blah without critical thinking showing a grasp of what's real or not. To your reference about 'crying wolf', take what we had on HCQ in the spring vs today. Today there are now over 100 peer reviewed published studies, both RCT and observational, that taken together show a 64% risk reduction for hospitalization and death when it's started in an early outpatient setting. The odds HCQ doesn't benefit in that scenario is 1:17 billion. If you just take RCT's for early home use of HCQ, the relative risk reduction is still 24%. But as of the last 2-3 weeks, it's becoming rapidly clear that Ivermectin is just flat out superior across all phases of the illness and continuing to separate. That's not crying wolf.

Obviously that doesn't make the credible presenters wrong, it just leads the audience to ignore critical distinctions and form inaccurate conclusions. I expect people probably earn a livable wage doing hit pieces for the right players. Why? It works. In this case, unfortunately more preventable death is the likely result. It's hard to imagine anyone who benefits from doing such a thing, unless of course it involves a whole lot of money.

That article paints the panel with a broad brush without making distinctions. There were different groups represented including one individual who just published the first US study on ivermectin (significantly positive outcomes treating the sickest ICU covid pts). One group represented on the panel, FLCCC, has been a beacon for a long time. A different group on the panel with a less stellar reputation had a panel rep that looks like the love child of HJ and Tiny Tim

It's unfortunate someone with some neuronal friction generating a little heat has tainted their veil of sincerity beyond repair like you. Stick to your Dossier secrets, troll.

fuck off. I trust the science and the scientists behind the vaccine development. It's the business face of big pharma I do not trust with managing the public good. Look at what they've done with insulin pricing, all kinds of pricing. They dgaf if you die or not, it's not their job, it's about the bottom line. If they can apply pressure on career DC bureaucrats, medical academics and their research hospitals, the print and TV media, and the pundits they pay for to occupy public minds and kneecap outliers, and any manner of dirty tricks to undercut any threat to the fatness of their profit, it's been my general observation they will, and have been doing it, and will never let up. If they could kick away a pillar of the pandemic response (4 pillars) to enlarge dependence on the 4th pillar, vaccines, they will. Everything I can see points to that having been unfolding from before we even knew what hit us. Nothing against the vaccines and the brilliant scientists who innovate, it's the business face of big pharma where the cockroaches live. fuck'em. Ivermectin evidence has arrived. Ignore it at your peril. The evidence shows it's a multi-tool to protect HCW's, elderly in LTCF's, and people over 50 with medical problems to take right away if they get sick. It's a clear path immediately available to save multiple tens of thousands of American lives. We can't wait 3-6 more months for vaccines to scale up when we have this gift today. I've got at least 3 months to see what happens before I even have a choice to get a vaccine. By then it might still be necessary, but then it might not. I know which option pharma wants.

The research based evidence that's come out in recent weeks/months does the talking. Better use of everyone's time for you respond to that. Dr. Kory pulls no punches in his observations of NIH, CDC, FDA complete failure to organize research in support of one of the 4 pillars of pandemic response: repurposing available and safe meds to treat a novel pathogen as early and rapidly as possible. Instead, not only have they done virtually no research with re-purposed meds, they have completely failed to adapt to emerging evidence, ongoing, for months. The playing field was gamed and western world kettled into vaccine development and mass deployment. Because of this, NIH, CDC, FDA have contributed to a significant worsening of our American catastrophe. Covid killed almost 3000 Americans today. Over 200,000 new US cases alone today, again. We'll be at 10,000 newly dead Americans from Covid in the month of December likely by tomorrow. 10k newly dead Americans before the 10th day of the month. Data on Ivermectin shows that if we started mass use this week, we're saving multiple tens of thousands of American lives long before enough vaccines can be manufactured and deployed.

I can't force you to read or listen. I can read and listen, so I'm open to hear how you arrived at your snake oil conclusion. You're a rehabilitated drug rep right? You may still need a bath.

For our resident science deniers and charlatans, here is the FLCCC and Dr. Kory's up to date 28 page manuscript on Ivermectin. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19 Outstanding

Dr. Pierre Kory's Senate testimony today.

Just talked to a HOU based family member who is a flight attendant on a trip to Brazil. Another crew member developed ILI on the dreamliner flight down. Test results are pending and they may end up being grounded there for at least 10 days. Family member walked around the corner from the hotel to a pharmacy and picked up a three month prophylaxis supply of ivermectin OTC for under $10. Chased first dose with a beautiful São Paulo filet.

Anything about what was presented about ivermectin? No? She’s serious.

I appreciate the ceaseless effort and contributions of Dr. Peter McCullough in Dallas. He's expertly fluent in science, research, and medicine and his personal contributions in medical research and literature are prolific. His comments starting around the 30-31' mark on major pandemic bungles are so important to understand, learn from, and accept for future use to guide decision making for globally better outcomes the next time. Heavy truth bombs in there throughout

When it comes to transactions, Pharma is more cutthroat than Trump could ever dream to be. It only underscores how worthless he is today. I haven't read the NYT article about him passing on the purchase of additional Pfizer vaccines last summer, but there already had to be personal vindictiveness involved (reported or not). Who knows what was going on back then that preceded the purchase snub. I'd like to know more, but for the first time ever with something involving Trump, I'm not too quick to pick a side in this particular instance. The scientists are brilliant, but the business face is ruthless and in many ways is too powerful for the public good. They must have pushed it in on Trump way back in the Spring. Maybe it was deserved, but maybe not entirely either.

Senate hearing tomorrow: Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II I expect Ivermectin will be prominently discussed. Pierre Kory, M.D. was one of three docs who made a call to action using Ivermectin last week outside of UMMC in Houston. Jean-Jacques Rajter, M.D. has been using ivermectin at his hospital in Broward FL since the summer with success, study publication pending. Ivermectin is a covid killer and its clear effectiveness has been clinically observed since last spring/summer. This is a good interview with the lead investigator of ivermectin use in Argentina. Additionally, they conducted an ivermectin prophylaxis study with hospital health care workers for a three month duration. In the group of HCW's treated with once monthly ivermectin, they had ZERO cases of covid out of 788 pre-treated health care subjects. The non-treated control group had 58% infection after 3 months. On the face of it, that's better than vaccine numbers. Plus it offers superior treatment of covid in every phase of the infection/illness. It's available right now. Today. Safety and tolerance is fully established and unquestioned. It's notable in the interview what Dr. Carvallo says about resistance to ivermectin use - it started only after the promising results began to emerge. He offers some illuminating insights about why, which should come as no surprise as the same phar out thing is happening here. Just ask Dr. Ratjer in Broward, FL. Read the first paragraph of the Intro of this for an idea of how diverse the use of Ivermectin is: Quantitative proteomics reveals a broad‐spectrum antiviral property of ivermectin, benefiting for COVID‐19 treatment:

Watch the physicians' call to action I linked just above. They really cover it all. But yes, that is essentially correct. Ivermectin also is thought to have an immune modulating effect or effect on inflammation which may account for growing observations that it improves condition in patients with ongoing 'long covid'. They mention this from the podium. Yes, ivermectin is 40 years FDA approved and was the basis for a Nobel Prize in medicine in 2015. It's very well tolerated and very safe. Drug to drug interactions are minimal though Dr. Marik above mentions graft rejection med cylosporin as one to watch in a small subset of people with an organ transplant. It's very effective and commonly used against scabies without FDA approval for that application. Standard stuff. Same dose range of ivermectin is used in covid as is used for other conditions, with some variations in frequency and duration for covid. The live conference above gives all the numbers including frequency and duration of dosing in different contexts. Anyone who listens to what those physicians present can tell whether or not they speak the truth and are impassioned to immediately help divert from a tragically worse path of human suffering and death.