please, elaborate with an example or two. I'm open to seeing things differently. I looked at China only because they spiked then flattened. What I'm looking at is roughly how long did it take to flatten after strict isolation started and by how many multiples did numbers continue to increase after isolation started before flattening. SK,HK,Sing,Taiwan all recognized what what happening in China jumped on it right away with masks, testing, and distancing so never had the spike Europe and the US are experiencing. Absent China, there's no other available comparison. that's all.
A big chunk of Italy was in lockdown the first week of March and national lockdown by the 13th. But even today, Italy's case rate and death rate are still doubling every 7 days. That's a significant improvement compared to doubling every 3 days like the US and 4 days (France, Spain), but it's still serious ongoing expansion. What separates the US is our comparatively high baseline case/death rate numbers when SIP started, and SIP is a very loose term for what's happening across our nation as a whole. We'll be at 500 deaths/d today, so potentially at around 4000 deaths/d 9 days from now. 3 days after that, 8000 deaths/d ? I can't imagine actually seeing something like 8k US deaths/d, but that's what the math says happens less than two weeks after SIP starts, and we're not doing all the things that boost SIP like the countries have that are showing sustained success, masks being a huge one. Probably what we'll see is numbers not be full throttle hopefully starting next week due to regional rolling SIP that began in early March. We'll see rates improve/stabilize first in the centers initially hit (SEA/NY/NJ/CA) while later expand/mushroom in the last places to seriously implement SIP measures.