Jump to content

triplehorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    4441
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by triplehorn

  1. That brief article doesn't go into the from "where" the profits could arise. I know I posted about this in the past year or two, maybe on TOS, but I was a fireside chat of sorts headed by Ross Perot Jr and AT&T top legal counsel David McAtee. Perot spoke about the new space race being about mining asteroids orbiting the sun in our solar system. You could probably expand that to exoplanets of Jupiter, etc. Asteroids likely contain abundant precious elements and potentially other naturally existing substances that could be used in new energy and energy storage technology. Energy and energy applications is where the trillion(s) would come from. Obviously, you need a new generation of space craft to exit and enter our atmosphere, and to navigate in, around, and on surfaces beyond earth. That's where this all could be headed. I joked in the trump 2020 thread about the new Space Force logo resembling the shape of the mythical Lockheed TR3B air/spacecraft. Maybe there is some truth in jest, but keeping the avionics/propulsion tech secret potentially is a trillion plus dollar advantage. Lockheed's mythical triangle craft supposedly incorporates a mini-nuclear powered engine to highly accelerate a magnetized fluid in a closed circular path in the middle of the triangle. The supposed result is the generation of a toroidal magnetic field with a gravity reducing effect. Thrusters are under each tip of the triangle to for vertical lift, along with a side thruster for horizontal motion. In principle, this thing could rise straight up and out of our atmosphere into space and re-enter in a controlled vertical drop with a new payload gathered from the solar system. If Elon, Perot Jr, other billionaires are angling to mine asteroids in a new era of innovation, technology and energy use, it's got to incorporate this new kind of space avionics. Back in post WWII cold war years, we were already developing mini-nuclear engine powered inter-ballistic missiles. German scientists during WWII were also already investigating the use of toroidal magnetic fields for propulsion. So this shit isn't completely insane. Periodically take a look at Lockheed Martin's twitterfeed.
  2. John Roberts comes face to face with the mess he made
  3. surprise, surprise. "Putting heads on pikes" is an established part of Trump's lexicon (emphasis on the con). Someone should remind Senator Murkowski before she suffocates from her own faux indignation and remains blind to overt jury tampering.
  4. This is arguably worse news for GOP Senate than Trump.
  5. Lockheed out front shoulda told you 😉
  6. I'll never forget Sam Alito's reaction here, wincing and mouthing 'that's not true'. we got sold.
  7. fify a little foot warming insurance for the nuclear tech deal
  8. Right. We’re not quite there yet. What the public is witnessing being perpetrated by everyone in the loop of Trump crimes and coverup helps expand public awareness and understanding of the rationale for why such a step might be justified and necessary. It’s building.
  9. At some point, House needs to consider shutting off govt purse if this degree of treachery persists and escalates. That’s one fairly definitive lever it wields.
  10. House should flash that Lev with Bondi pic on the screen in the Senate
  11. I'd chalk it up to payoffs, fear, or both. When shining light with hard receipts on illicit global cash flows, rubles to dollars, think about who you're fucking with. Think about what happens to Russian journalists. Look at what's happened outside of Russia's border. The immediate cyber attacks on ForensicNews are a signal to other journalists as much as it is to Stedman.
  12. Broeksmit has possessed the Deutsche Bank data his high ranking DB exec dad possessed since his death by suicide in January 2014. From what Broeksmit says above, NYT's Enrich struck a deal w Deutsche Bank not to report on Russia. Imagine if actual uncompromised MSM reporting occurred on the data Broeksmit has possessed since 2014. No potus trump, for one.
  13. Probably next June when SCOTUS rules on DB being compelled to turn over their Trump financials to US House and NY. Stedman got his initial reporting from Val Broeksmit, son of deceased DB exec who oversaw what DBTCA was up to. Val got a hold of his dad’s hard drives and official files that detail all this. Val cooperated with FBI counterintelligence agents and was in contact with Schiff and Dan Goldman over his evidence. Anast referenced Enrich reporting previously. Val worked with Enrich on the reporting for a long time and bailed in part realizing some shady negotiation limited what Enrich could report on. NYT’s Maggie Haberman was on Val too and he basically told MSM to fuck off with their bs interactions with him or something. So it’s not like MSM is not aware. They were beating down his door the morning after his dad died, which is weird on its own. Val vetted Stedman on his own and Stedman struck the right tone with him to get the collaboration using his documents.
  14. Today Scott Stedman's ForensicNews site broke a second huge Deutsche Bank story about illicit Russian cash flowing into DB directly proximal to massive amounts of DB cash loans flowing to Trump. And in rapid response, they are currently under their second sophisticated cyber attack. All this happening when no one would loan Donald a square to wipe his ass. DBTCA is the division of DB that was lending Trump massive amounts of rubles cash.
  15. well, well, check out this load of BS. Is this lady a prominent Bernie staffer ? Because she's sure in an anti-apologetic mode and looks terrible trying to put one over on us.
  16. Re Katyal: On what possible legal basis? The venerable “the defendant is scared of actual evidence” rule? Per Rolling Stone, Trump has some new good reasons to be scared of the evidence. Report: Lev Parnas Handed Over Tapes of Trump and Giuliani to the House Intelligence Committee oh lordy.
  17. Alan Dershowitz 1998 and 2020: On Clinton impeachment 8/24/98: "It certainly doesn't have to be a crime if you have somebody who completely corrupts the office of president and who abuses trust and who poses great danger to our liberty, you don't need a technical crime." On Trump Impeachment 1/19/2020: "Abuse of power, even if proved, is not an impeachable offense. [The framers] didn't want to give Congress the authority to remove the president because he abused his power. They have to prove crimes and misdemeanors."
  18. All appearances of obstruction of Congress aside, now is the time for all you FISA freaks and rockin' Deep Staters to really shine. Or come to grips with consequences of erroneously crying wolf all that time.
  19. Or he’s returning a favor to keep his reputation out of the dumpster, and quite possibly his ass out of prison. Ask Lolita.
×
×
  • Create New...