Look, fuckhead...you know damn well that even the members that voted no all agreed that having more representation is better. The reason they voted no is because they didn't want to have to win 60% or 64% to pass something. It was 100% self serving.
* If this prop fails and strong mayor fails, there is no change.
* If this prop fails the vote and strong mayor passes, you still have no change, still have an uneven number and need only a simple majority.
* If this vote passes and strong mayor passes, it doesn't matter if you have an uneven number because the mayor would have veto power anyway.
* If this prop passes the vote and the strong mayor fails then you have an even number and need to win with a 7-5.
So they just didn't want to end up in a position where they had to win 7-5 to get their way.
So yeah...that makes sense to me and is logical. It's only not logical to you because you have your head so far up Adler's ass you only want exactly what he wants.