Heck even if it was close to going down, which I am still dubious on:
--SuperK literally said he doesn't know if his source is legit---its like Nahlin saying he knows the DC but can't share it yet but it's awesome.....If his source is Stoops as has been reported, then he is reporting it without actually believing it...otherwise why the need for the "Not sure if true" statement.
--The only actual report was some hack in bama who is regarded to some extent as being linked to Stoops and has supposedly inaccurately floated his name in the past for jobs.
--Every other report parroted this jackwagon and was heavily cached in terms of "we are hearing", "we expect", "reportedly", etc. Not one single twit in the sports media business except this tool none of us had heard from before last night could find any confirmation? The squid, rapgamelarry, bevoboulevard, and ceddyb would like a word with him.
--The only actual reporting on this from the Texas side was a mild tweet from B. Davis and FCB that Sark had told them Stoops wasn't going to be the coach....
--Let me remind you that Bohls and Golden basically declared Jihad on CDC 2 weeks ago. If you actually believe those 2 wouldn't have gotten wind of this, or gotten the info on what happened and used it to smear CDC......you are kidding yourselves.
So again, I don't believe the reports it was actually happening.
But...if it was....as much as I detest Mike Stoops as a human being, and think he would have been a horrible hire, he is still a better LB coach than 90% of Herman's staff and 85% of Strong's were and nobody said squat to prevent any of those idiotic hires. So either Sark is more aware of the world he is coaching in, more open to feedback, or doesn't think he is infallible to the point he can't admit a mistake on a coach.....All are improvements and good signs to me regarding where we are. It is certainly an improvement over at least the past 4 head coaches....I can't recall if McWilliams thought he was infallible or not.