TexasRenegade

I will say this. Things are certainly appearing to be on lovkdown leak wise. There isn't even that much outright being coming from the 9.95 crowd.....

I keep searching for a burnt orange kool-aid man busting through the wall going oh yeah....but haven't found it yet.

Granted. My apologies for getting derailed.

Eliminate @Tex Pete from the DC candidates. Not committed enough to recruiting.

umm bullets are basically self contained and a 1911 will fire in space.

Well Nicole's contact apparently ponied up more money then he originally committed to for Meyer so.....

Was this before or after they did each other's hair? Seriously? You think Saban and Sark agreed on what free agent coaches Sark is allowed to chase? Having some respect as to who he poaches from Sabans staff is one thing but there is no reason they would have any conversation about what coaches outside of Bama that he is allowed to hire?

Considering I don't think we've had that many rushing yards with all our rbs and Qb combined I'll allow it.

Wore pants with actual kneepads....I approve.

He doesn't think Arnett is a serious candidate and it is just leverage through the press for whomever the real target is.

There are plenty of 3-3-5 base schemes that recruit d-linemen with on problem. It's how they are used not the alignment. Orlando used them as spaceaters and we got killed on it, but that was his scheme not the 3-3-5 itself. I prefer 4 down linemen, but it isn't simply a matter of 3-3-5 can't recruit elite dlinemen.

Loyalties are also funny. He may prefer coaching with Sark over sticking with Bama. They may be a good fit together who knows. I don't find it that shocking.

There is a sticky on the main board........

Sounds somewhat Futuremanish.....

Is Brewster legit or is this just the annual new Coach is gonna bring Brewster back to Texas and we are gonna get all the recruits speculation? Honest question, I don't know if he and Sark have any kind of connection, which seems to matter more in coaching hires then fans realise.

My bigger attraction to Banks was taking his Texas recruiting away from Bama.....he is far more replaceable to me then Flood for this staff.

Whats the negative on Wiggins? 2022 recruits seem to love him and by all accounts he has done an awesome job at Bama both coaching and recruiting? There may be bigger fish out there, but I don't see a negative to Wiggins. If Banks doesn't come it is disappointing, but there are other rainmaker recruiters you can stick at TE.

I believe Tim Nunez called Leonard Davis the dancing bear.... a little further back then you were thinking.

With the qualifier that I thought Wickline would be awesome at Texas....I am still more excited for Flood.

Was Babers tight with Herman or something?

If Babers is really being that lazy in considering Sark and Herman are the same guy.....I mean to read idiots that know nothing on this board or their equivalents in the media say it is one thing....But I thought Babers had more actual football sense than this.

Again Flood would be huge to me. Haven't been this pumped for Oline stuff since we had coaches talking about "Dancing Bears"

People keep talking about Sark having a sobriety clause.....if we bring in Tee there better be a baby mama clause by all accounts.

I am pumped for Flood as Oline coach. Finally a quality oline coach. Course I thought the same when Wickline came here, but apparently Flood actually likes to recruit--The Brocks mentioned him and his coaching as a big part of the Bama appeal. Not sure if that is just yacking or not but it's there. I am not sweating S&C hire. Sark had a good one by all accounts at both UW and USC and I can't imagine he isn't aware of the importance after being around Carol and Saban. On the Muschamp front---Didn't Football Scoop or TFB say they weren't buying the Muschamp is out talk and think it is just negotiating between Will and Texas at the moment? The whole floating Derek Mason's name was referred to as leverage in negotiations correct? I believe they said Mason's side doesn't believe Texas will actually offer him and that they are just negotiating with their real target? I like Muschamp as a DC.....he was a little too bend but don't break against tech compared to how some others attacked the spread but I'd still take him back.