Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    13527
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

BurntEyes last won the day on January 4

BurntEyes had the most liked content!

Reputation

12229 Surly 1%

About BurntEyes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You clearly know jack shit about Texas' search criteria for position coaches. Let me help. 1) Do they have a stripper girlfriend 2) If yes, does that girlfriend own a monkey 3) If yes, is that monkey violent and prone to biting -if yes then - Hire and never fire that fine coaching staff asset. If no to all- 1) Have they coached at Texas before? 2) If yes, are in AARP? 3) If yes, do they have ties to FUPM? 4) If yes, has the game passed them by and are they inferior to the person they are replacing? If yes to all - hire them immediately If no to all- 1) Do they have zero history in that position historically? 2) If yes, are they yes men that have no skills and clearly are willing to flounder around indefinitely? - If yes to all hire them immediately and keep them no matter what.
  2. Has Akina entered the portal yet?
  3. But you're solid with JMU, Tulane, Ole Miss and Miami? I keed but there are so many different reasons to mock this CFP result picking the dumbest thing about the committee and its "process" is impossible. Just so much stupid.
  4. I would say the exact same thing for Akina, Brandon Harris and Chris Jackson. If substantial changes aren't made in those area.. I don't think any real changes are coming.
  5. Well, you could just try posting content discussion about the game rather than bitching about content you don't like in the thread.
  6. You mock others for wasting their time arguing fruitless points. Yet, here you are, on a college football forum, writing a long post explaining why people shouldn't bother discussing one of the most central points of online college football talk since the internet was invented by Al Gore. You should find some Anime forums and tell them why focusing their attention on cartoons and debating which is best is a massive waste of time.
  7. And a victory over OSU and Oregon.
  8. Yeah but our "great" coach prior was Butter Teeth and Coach Swip Swap Swill post. Maybe hire someone who has a winning track record at the P4 level consistently. Not sure why Texas decision makers always need the the redemption arch or hottest new unproven.
  9. My entire point is we have fuck all to do with the shitty choices Texas decision makers have regarding head coaches. Further, that Cignetti's resume prior was better, longer and more complete than any of the last 3 Texas hires and suprise, suprise his next step was better too. Would I have seen it as a better hire, yes. Would he have been my top choice, no. Would it have been preferable to any of the last 3, yes. I didn't bring up the topic in this thread, feel free to go back and find who did and complain to them. @BurntOrange&White nailed it.
  10. As opposed to say, a guy who averaged 7-6 for 5 years at Washington and went 9-4 in his single full season at USC before being let go the next year mid season. You're right, no way Cignetti's resume would stack up to that level of domination. 53-17 at IUP (.757 winning %) 47-9 at JMU (.840 winning %) Surely he'd fail at the P4 level: 23-2 at IU for a .920 winning % bringing him to a lifetime of .785 No way!!! But coach Cougar High in the AAC to 22-4 (84.6%), that's a sure fire coaching hire. OR going 37-15 (71.2 wp) at Louisville in the power house ACC for your complete HC resume is plenty. Your post is stupid and you should feel bad for posting it.
  11. You might want to check the Sark thread and late in the Arch thread. There is now a divide of back to back CFPs put it on the wall, better than Herman or Strong, and we can't do any better vs the math and behaviors compared against any equal level spenders doesn't work out, the plans are shitty, the position coaches suck and we need better results group. So, pretty much like every time Texas makes a bad football HC hire there is the fear of change head in the sand, rah rah support your coach and the our coach is not good divisions. It takes absolute failure for the yay team guys to see the light, every time. No amount of data will sway them.
  12. Honestly, it's rape the brand for any and all value. Drive football and any other sports brand equity as high as possible, lots and lots of "remote" learning, get rid of any and all expensive employees that don't deliver additional revenue directly or aren't marketable, then when it's dry, sell it back to the state or let it fold. Expect to see University of Utah remote learning adds during games, lots of roster turn over, and coaching changes as deemed necessary.
  13. This is unfortunately the truth, basically do whatever the fuck you want. No need to stay consistent or even logical. Apply rules when you feel like it or it helps your personal agenda or don't as you see fit. Logic and reason need not apply and if at all possible you should neglect some deserving teams in order to include multiple G5s because nobody gives a shit about the games they will play in the CFP. This isn't about money or logic, it's about agendas and stupidity. The more the better. With TONS of Regards, The morons who designed this cluster fuck. @notre dame joe Your biggest beef should be with G5 or with your athletics department for not joining one of those also ran conferences.
×
×
  • Create New...