Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    10144
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

BurntEyes last won the day on January 4

BurntEyes had the most liked content!

Reputation

7728 Surly 1%

About BurntEyes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. And because chainsaw seems to want to argue the "where he planned to stab him" angle for some unknown reasons, I'll point out, doesn't fucking matter. If your attack resulted in death, even if you were trying to stab their big toe, it qualifies under serious bodily injury if they... DIE as a result of the attack. (46) "Serious bodily injury" means bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.
  2. You clearly have reading comprehension issues. I posted the laws. Under the laws definition it qualifies. I don't have to make the case.
  3. Do they serve sea bass or booze anywhere close to the PCL? No? 1 + 1 = 2 Clearly, it wasn't Nicole. Apparently, only homeless people get murdered on stairs. White people don't take stairs. 2 + 2 = 4 So a Chinese homeless person was murdered in the PCL by someone other than Nicole. This is simple math man.
  4. Yes, easily. Does not matter where he was trying to stab him, he was trying to stab him and it resulted in death. That clears the bar for intent to cause bodily harm per my note and quote of the law above. You're tilting at windmills. The law says that's murder in that aspect. Using a knife to attack someone that results in death qualifies for the intent to cause bodily harm per Texas law on murder.
  5. Doesn't even matter where he was trying to stab him per my note of the law above. Using a knife that results in death falls clearly into bodily harm definition.
  6. As in serious bodily harm? Texas Law: (46) "Serious bodily injury" means bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ. Or serious learning deficiency? I would have to look up the legal history on that one, but pretty sure there are set mental incapacity standards that have already been set. Likely they'd need to have extensive prior recognition by the state to make it remotely reasonable. In short, if you attack someone with a knife, I really dont think any lawyer is gonna fight that with a "He didn't know a knife was dangerous" defense. It doesn't hold any water and no jury is buying it.
  7. Too much I don't know about the case to determine murder charge. Purely on the knife aspect per penal law of Texas subsection 2 underlined below stabbing someone with a knife is clearly intened to cause serious bodily harm. Its a huge reach, imo, to argue that someone is unaware that stabbing them with a knife can be life threatening. Its a pretty weak argument that I don't think many jurors would buy. "He didn't know attempting to stab him in the arm could result in death." Intention to do bodily harm that resulted in death is pretty clear on anyone stabbing anyone. Unless a lawyer wanted to argue that his client didn't intend to do serious bodily harm with his knife. Which... I guess a lawyer could try, but unless there are some serious learning deficiencies isn't gonna fly. which passion arises at the time of the offense and is not solely the result of former provocation. (b) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual; (2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual;
  8. The adage, "There are two side to every story and the truth is usually found in between." is very frequently true. I often opt for as many facts and perspectives to be released prior to drawing any sort of conclusions. But I'm dumb like that as everyone here knows.
  9. I have no dog in the fight, motown also added this: But I wouldn’t buy that narrative at face value any more than I’d buy the victims family’s initial narrative at face value
  10. Only after Tennessee getting a no hitter first. Delicious is all regards.
  11. Bro, its Surly! We could win a NC in every sport we play sans a single lost all season in all games... This group would find issues. Back on track.. great 7th and good to be... good again.
  12. You should purchase a karambit and take some bladed weapons training. True talk, slicing is a far better tactic than piercing if you want to be effective with an edged weapon.
  13. I think it may be party that but I'd also guess for unsolved crimes or crimes where the fire arm isn't specifically linked to the crime they might just put it in firearm. There are many rifles and carbines chambered in pistol caliber. There are also items such as black powder which I think is a tiny fraction. They dont spell it out in their definitions so, I'm going off logic.
  14. US Assaults 2023 by weapon type 2023 US homicide data
×
×
  • Create New...